HeadNun

I said we're becoming a more class-less society, and I stand by that. Historically, wealth had little to do with social class. You could be upper class yet poor, and if you were working or lower middle class and had made money, you'd be looked down upon by higher classes and described disparagingly as 'nouveau riche'. Petit bourgeois was a similar insult which, as Jenijen rightly said, was more about the attitude of a certain socially aspirational lower middle class. The Macmillan dictionary definition is not quite how it's used. That's what I mean when I talk about class, and thankfully a lot of that snobbery is disappearing. That's not to say other social divides aren't forming, and that the rich-poor gap isn't widening, and that it isn't totally shit, but they're two totally separate things.

Yep, swiped at me just last night. She's a wee minx. My dog is petrified of her.

I see the 500 degrees pizza place is being replaced by....... a pizza place

TBH, comrade, I'm not convinced of the accuracy of your definition of "bourgeois", either in a Marxist/Marxian sense or the vernacular sense, which both correctly describe Soderberg. But you obviously have strong feelings about it, so feel to imagine Soderberg described as "yet another coffee shop/bakery for the bourgeoisie", which I hope you find dogmatically acceptable. https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/bourgeois_1 If Dulwich becomes plagued by as many Kulak-oriented shops (perhaps they would sell petrol cultivators, or yokes for oxen) as we have smug identikit coffee shops, I will come back to moan about the preponderance of kulak-oriented shops. Until then... I have to agree with Penguin here - 'bourgeois' might describe the patrons, but I don't see how a bakery can be bourgeois. Anyway, this word surely no longer describes anyone these days, it's a pejorative way to describe social climbers in the past who belonged to the lower middle classes. Surely these days we're a far more class-less society. These places might be predictable, perhaps, with a large dollop of twee, but not bourgeois.

Have a listen / watch to this too. https://drchatterjee.com/how-to-heal-chronic-pain-with-dr-howard-schubiner/

Hey Jody, Do you know if there is any actual medical treatment for Long Covid? So little is known about it, other than a very large list of (often quite vague) symptoms. I'm not sure what can be done medically for post viral complications / fatigue, other than waiting for it to pass. Have you considered contacting a group like https://www.sirpa.org/about? They are a group of medical & healthcare professionals who are having great success helping patients with chronic pain, ME and Fybromylgia etc. Also, try the Curable app - some clued up GPs will write you a prescription, so you can use it for free for six weeks. Try reading anything by Howard Schubiner or John Sarno. Some people have been 'cured' just by reading Sarno's book, though it of course depends on what your symptoms are. I have a GP friend who is making great strides helping patients with Long Covid symptoms and the other illnesses listed above, without the use of drugs. You can always message me if you'd like to know more

Gail's is opening on Zenoria Street, right around the corner from the Nordic bakery.

It appears that socially constructed stereotypes are the new way to define women and men. So if a man wears a dress, paints his nails and calls himself Delilah, then he's a woman. If a woman cuts her hair short, dons some DMs and braces, then she's a man. Neither needs to take hormones to be considered to have changed 'gender', they just need to 'live' as they 'feel'.

This issue spans the political spectrum. Most radical fems who are gender critical tend to be politically left-wing. But many right-wingers are against this new religion. It's possibly the only issue which both sides are united upon.

You need to leave the confines of your basement & take a step into reality you absolute degenerate. Wow! All because I see people for who they are and not their private parts. First it's racism, then homophobia and now in 2020s Britain transphobia has replaced homophobia as the socially acceptable form of hate. No. This is the 2020's equivalent of the sexual abuse scandal in the catholic church / children's homes. Only difference will be that it wasn't covered up, it was actively encouraged by people who'd drunk the kool aid. And what's the collateral damage? Thousands of young people with double mastectomies, atrophied vaginas and wombs, infertility, changed voices, hair where they no longer want it... all without informed consent. My father's a paediatrician (dealt with numerous intersex cases throughout his career), who started to get scared back in 2014. All letters to the Tavi, stonewalled, my brother's a doc, he's bewildered, same with my uncle, my cousin, all of them scientists and saying "the emperor is fucking naked", but you flat-earthers have no time for science. You know better.

I don’t know what sex you are but I’m telling you that I don’t know a single woman who wants a biological male in their private spaces or sports categories. Not a single female. None. And none of them is homophobic, in fact some of them are lesbians. If you’re female then you’re an anomaly, if you’re male then you’re an entitled misogynist and the main crux of this heinous problem. And if you only see people “for who they are and not their private parts” then why do you support people changing their pronouns, identifying with stereotypical tropes of what male and female is, and potentially mutilating themselves beyond all repair? Surely the people who are against all this new religion (“transphobes”) are the ones who truly care about who people are and not what’s in their pants? Go figure

I support the rights of trans people, but I am against male-bodied people being allowed into women's changing rooms, toilets, prison wings and rape centres. I am against male-bodied people competing against women in sport. I am also against self-ID, where a man being able to say he identifies as a woman and throwing on a dress permits him to then walk into any female spaces he so pleases without scrutiny. And I am against young children being told that the way out of their genuienly distressing gender dysphoria is to wear a breast binder and go on puberty blockers, without a SHIT TON of therapy first to find out the root of their dysphoria (which is often because they are gay and often autistic). People who shout 'transphobe' at the first available opportunity tend to be the ones who cover their ears and shout 'la la la la I'm not listening', instead of engaging with this nuanced discussion in an adult way. Luckily insidious orgs like Mermaids, who were grooming kids online, have finally had a light shone on their dubious behaviour. Anyway, if anyone else is worried about their kids and / or their own access to what should be female-only spaces and wants to to form some sort of discussion group, you can DM me.

Utterly bizarre. What a shower of idiots

If you think Rowling and Duffield are transphobic then you’ve just jumped on a bandwagon without doing your homework or interrogating the facts

You have misinterpreted my views. I’m not homophonic, all my gay friends feel as I do and none of them wish to be associated with trans rights activists or Stonewall. They’re fed up with seeing kids who are probably gay being told they’re trans and born in the wrong body.

Yes. Quite simply this: There are only two sexes in the human species. I don’t subscribe to gender. It’s a social construct ascribed to sexes which stereotypes. For example, women wear skirts and lipstick. Boys wear blue and like guns and trains. Gender is mere stereotype but sex is immutable and you can’t alter your sex. Therefore a man wearing female clothing shouldn’t be allowed in women’s toilets just because he says he feels like a woman.

Well, I was going to write a long post about why, but then Sonia Sodha wrote this in the Guardian, published today, so I don't have to. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/02/if-labour-is-truly-the-party-of-equality-it-wouldnt-shut-down-the-trans-debate

I was recently walking through Peckham Rye and heard two young girls educating a boy about all the different genders there are and how you know if you're a boy or a girl. I also recently cancelled my membership to the Labour party and emailed Helen Hayes to explain why, and of course didn't receive a reply. Has anyone else reached their fill with this dangerous transgender ideological myth? I feel so anxious about the lies with which the youth are being indoctrinated and also anxious about who I'm going to vote for in the next election. I know it won't be the Conservatives, but I don't feel I belong in Labour as long as they seem to be reluctant to nail their colours to the mast when it comes to safeguarding the rights of women and children, or even being able to simply define what a woman is.

It was awful today to see what looked like a collision between a young woman and a motorbike. Poor girl didn’t look as if she was in a good way. I really hope she’s ok and good for everyone who helped her while the ambulance was on its way.

Thanks Philly, I will definitely put it in the contract next time and make it very clear to any future lodgers. The other day he came home and offered me a sincere apology - said he'd been asking around and realised he'd got it all wrong. He's been living out of the UK for twenty years, and has never lodged before, so I guess he is a little out of touch. I also said he can stay the occasional Sunday, FOC, with plenty of notice. So all's well. Thank you, everyone, for your advice.

Thank god for the member of the public, and that no one was harmed. I wonder if crime is going to rise exponentially in the midst of the cost-of-living crisis. I suspect it already is.

He had a very good reason to need some flexibility, he just didn't tell me he needed flexibility. Instead he thought he could turn up on my doorstep, even though I asked him not to, on a night for which he wasn't paying.

I wish I'd been clever enough to think of this brilliant analogy myself last night.

Thanks Jenijen. His argument is that, because he's paying me monthly, and often doesn't stay all the nights he's paid for, he expects some flexibility to stay on a Sunday. It's v complicated.

Brighton, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater - good GPs are like hen's teeth and if you have a lot of needs, which it sounds as if you do, then you should stay with the practice and with a GP you trust and who knows your history. Instead, follow others' advice and complain about the receptionist. I'm sure there must have been complaints about her before, judging by this thread. It sounds exhausting, but you don't want to change GP only to discover your new practice is worse. I'm with DMC on Crystal Palace Road and don't rate them hugely, but they're all locums, so it's hard to tell.