Hill Dweller

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > are any of your comments here relevant to this > thread? no? Was that relevant to it? Nope, I rate it as simply bandwagonhopping. Well done. YES, my first query IS relevant. Was the OPer reporting obscenity, a form of sexual harassment or 'simply' someone casing the joint? I would be FAR more concerned about the former and FAR less bothered about the latter. The covert censorship here totally disproves the pretentious claims by so many on the ASSange thread.

I have a suggestion. People stop posting about me and then complaining that the convo has become about me. Get back on topic, wasn't it meant to be about the world, not this little patch of it?

I have no problem with you exposing your bullying MO Gab. I guess you're not the author so-named?

Dickensman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The snotty but 'higher quality' Hill Dweller, > will discover that if you dish it out you have to > learn to take it, > even from the 'lowest of the lowest classes' You don't get much nuance do you dick? Re-read my post, move your lips and use your pointy finger if you need to. It was people who WERE ignoring your and two other roaches' posts that were being described as higher quality. I was commenting on the posts so I was NOT ignoring. Geddit? Engage more than first gear dear.

I have responded by PM to two. Another required no reply and yet another was replied to on thread. Where have I abused people (before they'd abused me)? What insults? As someone has posted elsewhere, if people wanna give it they need to be able to take it. Someone doesn't like my opinion of ASSange (so many of them that admire him but behave sooooo very covertly themselves ....LOL) and attacks my input. Someone else's dirty mind (and possibly their wrong assumption about me and my own body) describes my query to an OP as 'lewd'. Nope chum, I won't be stowing the 'little hitler' allegations. Follow your heart < I really mean that.

And you set yourself up to judge what's lewd LOL

The only way pension pots could ever accrue as they did was via unethical investments and they usually equate to exploitation and usually of those in the third world. We should be celebrating that that is coming to an end. .

You can find your own state pension age from this. http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/state-pensions/state-pension-age-calculator :-S

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And some people, like incontinent mongrels, just > pissed over all of it and ruined it for everyone. > > :) If you're suggesting that has happened somewhere or other, analyse it, display it, prove it, pretend to be ENGLISH and not just any stupid sod on a bandwagon.

Wyatt must have had second thoughts :))

computedshorty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mind you you do stay up late. Stay up late or get up early? My word your world has such wide horizons xxx Second guess you've got wrong in the one post btw ;)

Dickensman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The snotty but 'higher quality' Hill Dweller, > > will discover that if you dish it out you have to > learn to take it, > > even from the 'lowest of the lowest classes'. Just imagine this. A gutless wolly scuttles like a cockroach away from an ACTUAL 'convo' WITH a fellow poster in to another thread to post ABOUT them. Are you wearing a hairnet and curlers? Your mealy-'mouthed' behaviour suggests you should be doing so. Take it? What ...... from you? A stinking cowardly gum slapper? Oh yes honeybunch :))

the lowest of the lowest class will continue trying to talk about people with other people (and hopefully continue to be ignored by those of higher quality)

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > are any of your comments here relevant to thisthread? no? Is that? Is your 'no?' an answer to yourself or a question to me? However, well done, you HAVE established bandwagoner credentials. Why on earth do you not trust someone to look after themself in a spat? The majority is NOT always right, the question WAS relevant. Your possible disagreement about that is meaningless. KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > tfm33 if you're concerned by this visitor you > really should report it to the police. > > safer neighbourhoods... Quite so. It would have been even more important (imhoo) to do so had the caller's suggestion been something else. .

Musings...... Some people think the world was given to 'us' by someone they think created it. Then groups of mankind grabbed what bits they wanted and put walls round what they considered their bit. We know for sure, as he does exist, that someone sensed that the internet was tangible and, having proved it and set up the pathways to it he gave it to mankind. Then groups who think they're achievers grabbed bits and make gormless rules and threats about what they dare assume to be their property. :)