Hill Dweller

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > are any of your comments here relevant to this > thread? no? Was that relevant to it? Nope, I rate it as simply bandwagonhopping. Well done. YES, my first query IS relevant. Was the OPer reporting obscenity, a form of sexual harassment or 'simply' someone casing the joint? I would be FAR more concerned about the former and FAR less bothered about the latter. The covert censorship here totally disproves the pretentious claims by so many on the ASSange thread.

I have a suggestion. People stop posting about me and then complaining that the convo has become about me. Get back on topic, wasn't it meant to be about the world, not this little patch of it?

I have no problem with you exposing your bullying MO Gab. I guess you're not the author so-named?

Dickensman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The snotty but 'higher quality' Hill Dweller, > will discover that if you dish it out you have to > learn to take it, > even from the 'lowest of the lowest classes' You don't get much nuance do you dick? Re-read my post, move your lips and use your pointy finger if you need to. It was people who WERE ignoring your and two other roaches' posts that were being described as higher quality. I was commenting on the posts so I was NOT ignoring. Geddit? Engage more than first gear dear.

I have responded by PM to two. Another required no reply and yet another was replied to on thread. Where have I abused people (before they'd abused me)? What insults? As someone has posted elsewhere, if people wanna give it they need to be able to take it. Someone doesn't like my opinion of ASSange (so many of them that admire him but behave sooooo very covertly themselves ....LOL) and attacks my input. Someone else's dirty mind (and possibly their wrong assumption about me and my own body) describes my query to an OP as 'lewd'. Nope chum, I won't be stowing the 'little hitler' allegations. Follow your heart < I really mean that.

And you set yourself up to judge what's lewd LOL

The only way pension pots could ever accrue as they did was via unethical investments and they usually equate to exploitation and usually of those in the third world. We should be celebrating that that is coming to an end. .

You can find your own state pension age from this. http://www.pensionsadvisoryservice.org.uk/state-pensions/state-pension-age-calculator :-S

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And some people, like incontinent mongrels, just > pissed over all of it and ruined it for everyone. > > :) If you're suggesting that has happened somewhere or other, analyse it, display it, prove it, pretend to be ENGLISH and not just any stupid sod on a bandwagon.

Wyatt must have had second thoughts :))

computedshorty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mind you you do stay up late. Stay up late or get up early? My word your world has such wide horizons xxx Second guess you've got wrong in the one post btw ;)

Dickensman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The snotty but 'higher quality' Hill Dweller, > > will discover that if you dish it out you have to > learn to take it, > > even from the 'lowest of the lowest classes'. Just imagine this. A gutless wolly scuttles like a cockroach away from an ACTUAL 'convo' WITH a fellow poster in to another thread to post ABOUT them. Are you wearing a hairnet and curlers? Your mealy-'mouthed' behaviour suggests you should be doing so. Take it? What ...... from you? A stinking cowardly gum slapper? Oh yes honeybunch :))

the lowest of the lowest class will continue trying to talk about people with other people (and hopefully continue to be ignored by those of higher quality)

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > are any of your comments here relevant to thisthread? no? Is that? Is your 'no?' an answer to yourself or a question to me? However, well done, you HAVE established bandwagoner credentials. Why on earth do you not trust someone to look after themself in a spat? The majority is NOT always right, the question WAS relevant. Your possible disagreement about that is meaningless. KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > tfm33 if you're concerned by this visitor you > really should report it to the police. > > safer neighbourhoods... Quite so. It would have been even more important (imhoo) to do so had the caller's suggestion been something else. .

Musings...... Some people think the world was given to 'us' by someone they think created it. Then groups of mankind grabbed what bits they wanted and put walls round what they considered their bit. We know for sure, as he does exist, that someone sensed that the internet was tangible and, having proved it and set up the pathways to it he gave it to mankind. Then groups who think they're achievers grabbed bits and make gormless rules and threats about what they dare assume to be their property. :)

I could suggest you stick to the topic of the thread Pgc ..... oh, having started off topic you did finish by getting back on to it. I can see you're someone that, if nothing else, is capable of recognising a bandwagon. Well done that wo/man. ------------------------------ You must be very delicate in what you consider 'lewd' or perhaps you simply have no curiosity or interest in what the OPer elsewhere was actually on about. A poster I took (still take, as in presume) to be a female OP/threaded about a 'suspicious caller' offering to cut her (or his) hedge, but carrying no gardening tools then spending some time staring at him/her. My question was totally genuine, were they posting using a euphemism? Hey just think, if they had been doing so it might have been because of stupid allegations they've read here in the past about 'lewdness'. I would find the eupehemism (had it been one) far more concerning than I would find a door to door handyman. ---------------------------------- There was NO explanation about the split-second removal of my post till I asked for one. Split-second equates to kneejerk, no consultation; it indicates little hitlerism. Pardon me mixing topics but I'll repeat that I find it laughable that the remover (or supporter) would have stayed anonymous (or even hidden) if I had not questioned the split-second action, has posted elsewhere with approval of ASSange's exposures. LOLLLLLL That's a someone that (I presume) has chosen their unusual posting ID, one which (if not theirs IRL) is owned by / lifted from someone with quite a hobbyhorse. --------------------- PS: Pgc I find your choice of tag for me more lewd than my question to a poster that expressed real or imagined vulnerability. Oh double LOL at some EDF members. Anyone wonder if I'm using a euphemism? .

we can't really blame a 'gas board' any more Tarot. It was all broken down by Snatcher so we don't have a shop front or even a permanent name to look up the phone number for any more. We don't even get reminded who our supplier is, once we've been passed from one supplier that's been gobbled up by another. I've never had a gas leak and hope I never will, I've been flooded and that was enough for one lifetime imhoo :'( Have a good evening, bfn.

I doubt he'd been sent by the Gas Board though Tarot. It really isn't in their interest to be using non-reg'd people; weren't they instrumental in that becoming a requisite? BTW, Corgi isn't the body any more! http://www.gassaferegister.co.uk/ .

Is anything on this any help? http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=how+to+change+the+router+number+on+imac&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a I don't have an iMac any more so can't remember how I did it through Safari

I daresay throwing blame where it doesn't belong is your habit at home too ????. If so your sharers have my sympathy. Look for where the exchange became insulting (as opposed to merely swapping or questioning opinions) and get off that pedestal of thinking you are right (or in it). I was in a convo with Tarot, it was doing fine. Do you behave the way you did when you pass people talking on LL? My opinion was not 'tosh' ...... nor was it something that anyone other than a poser would use the word 'thesis' about, as if over-describing something you then knock down heightens the satisfaction you give yourself. I expressed horror about reminders of a period when our establishment contained a member who was far worse even than Powell, more full of hate and more intent on whipping up people's emotions. There IS such a figure that is manipulating young disaffected people now. Ignore that if you wish but don't expect others to.

Yep, it's hard to explain subjectivity or prejudice and cosmetify it isn't it?

Like I said, explain what you took exception to, not that I expect the news to be either interesting or informative but just so I know you know what you think you read.

I recently bought this for someone http://www.pregnancyformen.co.uk/

In other words, you have no idea, no grace and no manners (tu)

I'm looking for fights? reread the post of mine that you responded to within minutes and explain what was fight-y about it. If you're bored and have to pic them yourself (like a few other old timers here) try being a 'fresher' elsewhere or stfu and use IGNORE.