
red devil
Member-
Posts
9,564 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Blogs
FAQ
Tradespeople Directory
Jobs Board
Store
Everything posted by red devil
-
Week 30 points... Week 30 table...
-
Fookin' 'ell, it's only been up and running 5 mins and there's already an EDF expat clique! Won't be long before the blow-in name-calling starts..;-)
-
Sorry TT, wasn't trying to pry, just wanted to stress how important context is if you want advice that is relevant. In light of what you've subsequently said I'd say you were perfectly right to be ticked off, although your circumstance at the time may have also added to your annoyance. Of course you could simply switch off/not answer your phone, but that doesn't solve the underlying problem of why he did it in the first place, which I think is your issue. I don't think there is a generic solution to that, something you need to work through with him. Is there a friend you can discuss this with, someone who knows you well as a person, or even better the both of you?...
-
That adds to the context, but only goes so far. For instance, is this the first time such a thing has happened, or is it a regular occurrence? Any relationship/friendship is about finding out what the other person likes/dislikes and realising their boundaries. If it's the first time this has happened, then your friend has learnt that there is a line not to be crossed and hopefully won't do it again. Maybe you shouldn't try to over analyse the situation, you were hot, knackered, and a long way from home etc...
-
I think it does matter, otherwise advice/thoughts can only be based on presumptions. Here's one, maybe he had only just read your message, not realising you had sent it 20mins earlier, and he wanted to quickly wish you a pleasant sleep after your hard day. Some would say that's quite a nice thing to do, and not out of the ordinary if you know this person well...
-
Context is everything, I think a lot depends on the nature of your relationship with this guy, as to whether he crossed a line or not...
-
I know you won't admit it when you're wrong...
-
Jocky, you sound like a complimentary beer kinda guy, if so get yourself down to Barry Road Barbers...
-
Try Kath and Kim Lou, far more subtle...
-
aquarius moon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Trying to get a word in (but failing) on the > general election thread. > What are they talking about?!!!!!! Don't fret pet. Remind yourself that despite the pseudo-intellectual bollox, at the end of the day your vote counts the same as theirs ;-)
-
JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The tuition fees thing, I saw as not important - > as > they all lie. It was important to the swathe of first-time young voters who voted LD...
-
Here you go PD, posted March 9th... red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Bunching up behind the leaders just like the PL. > Not been a vintage year points wise, LadyG only > averaging 7.15pts, past winners nearer to 8, so > LadyG definitely catchable with 10 games to go... Stop smoking the Skunk, it's making you paranoid...
-
The going home for the weekend song thread...come on you groovey foookers
red devil replied to ????'s topic in The Lounge
Get ready for the big fight... Mayweather to win on points -
Why do your remarks remind me of someone with a persecution complex? Try not to flatter yourself in future...
-
Me too. Hasn't been a vintage season though, Parky's average is only 6.1, for previous winner's it's been around 7. Week 30 fixtures... Saturday 2nd May 2015 Leicester v Newcastle Aston Villa v Everton Liverpool v QPR Sunderland v Southampton Swansea v Stoke West Ham v Burnley Man Utd v West Brom Sunday 3rd May 2015 Chelsea v Crystal Palace Tottenham v Man City Monday 4th May 2015 Hull v Arsenal
-
Week 29 points... Week 29 table...
-
Cherries is a good choice, what about Palace as they are the nearest, or is that a local no-no being a Millwall fan?...
-
I had a soft spot for Wigan, little club punching above it's weight and that FA Cup win, but no more with Whelan and Mackay on board...good riddance to rubbish.
-
Bike shed in front garden? (Do I need planning permission...)
red devil replied to crescent's topic in The Lounge
The Planning Portal doesn't make any reference, so probably best to contact the planners with your proposal. Try them on this number 020 7525 5447... -
In his role as a TV reviewer and monitor, Tarot gets down to work... http://regmedia.co.uk/2009/11/05/ohio_alternative.jpg What do you mean your name's Arthur, I thought you said Martha!
-
???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > red devil Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Otta Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Indeed, fair play West Ham, just hope some > > other > > > clubs follow their example. > > > > Yep, extremely generous considering they > > contributed the princely sum of ?15m towards > the > > ?619m refurb, and only have to pay ?2.5m pa in > > rent...guess who's picking up the tab? > > > West Ham offered to buy the OS when Terry Brown > was still Chairman and the oS wasn't even built - > rejected. Spuds offered to buy the Stadium and > Knock it down and rebuild the athletics track in > Crystal palace (this was politically unacceptable > given the legacy issue) so West Ham stepped in and > made the offer to rent .....if West Ham hadn't > then it would be sitting there empty getting > bugger all income. There's a share deal on match > catering etc. West Ham did a good deal that was > acceptable not West Ham's fault...so stop the > wining. You sound like the Foooking Guardian on > this, cheap seats should be welcomed but just a > chorus of Fooking moaning from rich clubs feeling > threatened, winey middle class lefties, who > couldn't give a shite about working class football > supporters, and Spuds fans. No one is disputing how WH got the stadium deal, personally I couldn?t give a fook, it was a legit deal and showed great business acumen by Brady. No one is disputing cheap seats, they are a good thing. What has been highlighted is Brady going on a PR exercise announcing the cheap seats are due to the increased Premier League money alone, which isn?t true. The cheap seats will be funded by the increase in corporate facilities at the OS. This was never mentioned, which I think is totally disingenuous of her. Otta hoped that other clubs will follow suit. Most clubs won't be able to. Their PL money will get swallowed up by an increase in transfer/agents fees and wages, as will WH's. WH can only do what they are doing i.e bring in a younger generation of fan at cheap prices whilst still maintaining their existing older fanbase, because of the increase in capacity. It's something they simply couldn't have done had they stayed at the Boleyn. So it would've been nice if Brady had given credit where credit's due. Oh, and if you want to throw class insults around, choose your targets more carefully, you know diddly about my background...
-
The going home for the weekend song thread...come on you groovey foookers
red devil replied to ????'s topic in The Lounge
Hipsters, fook toast, if you want to do something useful, bring back Hot Pants... -
Dopamine1979 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The ads are showing me a lady in lingerie for some > reason. Aren't these ads related to what sites people have recently been viewing?...I'm keeping schtum :)
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.