kleinhond

AFN's been posting under his own name again here: http://www.southeastcentral.co.uk/threads/oi-fiona-colley.413/ and rubbing a certain councillor up the wrong way, unintentionally of course...

have you tried asking here: http://www.southeastcentral.co.uk/forums/families.140/

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That one wasn't nearly as good. Yes, he's very hit and miss. Mainly miss.

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > However.. an Admin who pockets and publishes PMs > when the moment suits? Very poor form. Poor form > for a regular user.. but an Admin? > Oh, I forgot the denoument of that previous PM from the banned troll (carries on where the previous extract left off): "Also, I'll probably contact SRUG for involvement in their rail transport work and get more involved with local councillors especially around your area. The Nunhead Forum is okay but there are better places to set up my soap box. And let's face it, there are loads of interesting forums including some where I have had membership for a number of years. So banning me wouldn't be the end of the world. Michael" One suspects you're quite used to the banning action eh OD-US.

Michael or Mikecg? The choice is yours. I'd always suspected he was a previously banned troll, and for a while I thought he could be Atilla - particularly as both of them publicly proclaim the fact they only like black music and all that "all pop music is crap" hilarious bollocks. (for the record The Undisputed Truth were a Motown act - and there were pop moments a'plenty at Berry Gordy's empire, I'm afraid). Whatever, I don't know if anyone ever met Atilla or Mikecg in those guises, but like that potty pair, OD-US doesn't actually live in Nunhead (that's the part that really tickled me!) and in the words of a mutual friend of ours, "is a slightly disturbing half black guy in his 40s with dreadlocks you can smell from the other side of the M25. The sort that, if you heard on the news that he'd gone back to his old school armed with a sub machine gun, you wouldn't be at all surprised." Lovely!

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > All my posts on the Nunhead Forum were reasonable > I'm afraid. > > Apart from Huguenot, I have not intentionally insulted anyone and my > posts have been reasonable. What planet did you crawl out of? In what way is it "reasonable" to be a troll who threatens defenceless women, doesn't respect that fact that other people have different points of view and sends provocative PMs to the Admin of the forum they've only very recently joined, telling them they don't agree with anything they say and then urging action with the classic - the undisputed classic: "I hope you do ban me one day. As this will give me the motivation to set up a similar forum due to my very strong IT skills. My writing is probably the weakest part of my intelligence but I think the secret to good writing is actually lack of intelligence, ie, the ability to think small mindedly. There are a number of projects that I'll need to do that are lucrative in nature. copyright 5 May 2011, UDT - or should that be OD-US. The Comedy Store beckons, me lad! Oh, and still awaiting a decent "similar" then. >:D<

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well thanks for now letting know that I was banned > after several weeks. Like you didn't know, troll. Yes, in just a few short weeks your unashamed trolling caused such a stir that several people wanted you gone. Sound familiar EDF members? You also know full well that you threatened one of our longest serving and most respected members, who you knew to be female, in private messages to her - enough that she was seriously freaked out enough that she was worried you'd somehow gained information on where she lives etc. Despite warnings you continued to troll and infect as many threads as possible like the flaming annoying rash that you are. > hardly anyone posts on your forum > these days. Is this a reflection on you, KH? Loads > of mutterings about your removal. That's wishful thinking on your part! The forum's never been an online juggernaut like the EDF and never ever will be, whether I've been at the helm or not. It's the sleepier sister who has little time for the chattering classes or playing politics. Like I said in my opening post as NHF Admin in April last year: "Nunhead is a decent, slightly sleepy but refreshingly community-minded part of town, where the vast majority would, I'm sure, be vehemently against bullying, aggression or dogma. Let its own internet forum reflect that." http://nunheadforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,5,page=2 And which it does. Comprende? If you're that concerned about having an SE15 mouthpiece where you can fireblanket every thread at every available opportunity then instead of concerning yourself with a forum that has unceremoniously rejected you then why not set up your own, where you can stalk yourself 24/7? Oh, I see someone has. Twice already. Busy there eh! Talking of which, which Australian flying fool, sorry tool (typo! spellchecker!) met you in a local pub in early May and on the way home told a mutual friend of ours, "Oh God, I think I've made a terrible mistake. The guy really freaked me out!" Perhaps you can tell me if the aforementioned person has arranged to meet you since? Hang on, don't bother, I think I already know the answer. ;-)

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Not enough work (banning) at Nunhead Forum? On the contrary, the NHF is a much happier place since you were banned (at the behest of several long term members). And no one's been banned since you. But then again no one's such an unloved comedy freak as you. Have a nice day now.

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Now I understand what ???? meant a few posts up. > > Fair enough undisputedtuth, you don't get it. > Wasn't meant to be an 'in-joke'. You said on > another thread that you liked to gain insight into > the forum and that your posts are analytical. > Hardly seems like it. What he actually said was, and I lovingly quote and embolden for your amusement: I tend to be analyptical with everything I do. Is this the first time rimming has been alluded to on the EDF? Sic. (which is also how I feel right now)

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Undisputed truth is a Soulie...my oh my Is it 'cos he isn't white? And yes, that is a rhetorical question ;-)

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thatcher had intolerance for all sorts of things > and people. Unions and public services for a > start. The most blatent act of state sanctioned > prejudice was clause 28 - ask any gay person old > enough to remember about Thatcherite intolerance. And ask anyone even older, or who bothered to do their research (rather than continually repeat half-truths peddled by certain sections of the Press and the chattering classes), and they will tell you that in 1967, Thatcher was one of only FOUR Conservative MPs who voted (against the wishes of their party leadership) in favour of the Sexual Offences (Homosexual Reform) Act. The reform, which attracted considerable hostility in both the Commons and the Lords, was passed and allowed homosexual acts to be decriminalised for the first time. Not so cut and dried now though eh.

LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Thatcher is hated by millions after what she did > to the working class/North. I know of plenty of so-called 'working class' people who, when I asked them why they continued to vote Thatcher, replied that they were 'better off under her.' There are scores of people just like them, who kept her in power for three successive elections. At a guess I'd say they probably had memories of Labour in the 70s. > >Many people have waited a long > time to see her get her comeuppance. How exactly is an elderly lady in her 80s dying a 'comeuppance'?

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- >(because it > draws in spluttering wannabees like > UnreliablePrejudice) >:D<

James Brown, Bob Dylan, David Bowie, Kate Bush, Nina Simone, Bryan Ferry

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > good point DJ - ooops DJ? Merry Christmas then, Mr Lawrence (tu)