Dangerous, aggressive behaviour is nothing at all to do with poverty. Poverty was rife in the fifties, we were lucky to have a warm house, a decent hot meal and dry feet. There were very few murders and/or stabbings although there was widespread poverty. There was much better discipline and people seemed to have more pride/shame/standards. This controlled their behaviour as the neighbours would frown on the 'bad' family in the street. Not surprisingly, the police are intimidated by the potentially violent portion of the population, but they would nick you and I, as we are 'soft targets'. One year after I left school (1961) they stopped using the cane, and when I read about it in the local paper, I thought it was the beginning of the end. I could not imagine how the majority of the teaching staff could control the classroom without that threat. Most of us when we misbehaved at home got a clout, and it was non-negotiable, if you were caught breaking the rules a slap or two followed. When the schools were denied this, then the majority of teaching staff were no longer taken seriously. After bawling the child out there was nothing else to be done. Where as a 'telling off' at home was used for a less serious offence, something more serious would earn a couple of well aimed slaps, suddenly there was nothing else the schools could do, they were hamstrung.