SeanMacGabhann

Under pressure Is not the Same As get rid but then, as quids says..

Exactly declan. As a "reason" for a light sentence it is astonishing and yet it seems to pass without much comment. As a non believer I will rceive a longer sentence for the same crime?

Oh that's just silly jimmy. Serious problems at arsenal but sacking wenger is the kind of reactionary phone-in nonsense that makes me turn off the radio

Times 2. Jaysus

Bugger

oh FFS would you take your bone of contention with MP#s and just f***ing do one Steve I started this thread in the Drawing Room specifically to get away from this banality You haven't addressed the question at all

Ah but the point is not the amount. The point is how much is expected.

Roll deep.. Probably more to do with us not being a wolf in Deep's clothing.

The Castle is oft discussed on here. I like it. In fact I tend to agree with most of Mick Mac's selections and points above. I pointed out the Albert as an alternative to the gentrification The Castle has had a bit of a facelift, particularly on the left side of the bar

So this Shamso Miah was spared time because as a "devout" man he knew he was in the wrong and wouldn't benefit from a sentence? If someone is devout are they not MORE culpable for the crime than us godless heathens? The suggestion that religious people are better than the rest of us is one of that things that makes us so... aggresive towards faiths Cherie Blair, I'd like to wipe that... whatever that is from her face

I could have picked from a dozen threads, but regarding the "how come other countries manage ok but we in broken britain fail yet again.." type comments, I see that DC (that's washington, not Carnell) has struggles over the last few days with offices closing, people being sent home and told not to go out etc etc And this is a state which has spent big bucks just for this type of event - so I'm just saying can we ease up on the "what is WITH this country" rhetoric next time?

taper possible true about the Monty, but I'm hopeful that the Victoria will increase the profile of that road generally and the Mont might even benefit. I found the service and food generally in the MOntpelier to be fine - they just lack custom

I dunno Mick - the Well used to show football but didn't draw the footfall so I'm not sure Scott and the company have got that part wrong. Personally I would love to be able to watch sports there, it's a great space and I used to enjoy watching games (sometimes on my own) there but it's no way to stay in business If only the Montpelier up the road would allow sounds as well as pictures on their big screen Besides, if you are going to walk in from ED to watch sport, the Prince Albert a stones throw away does the job nicely

that's strippers for you scott Thanks for the update tho - any target date?

presumably you mean FF VII giggirl? to the end... and then so did LadyMac

Angela always looks after the forum drinks at the Black Cherry, fair play to her (with apologies to her for the behaviour after I left. Honestly I turn by back for two seconds...) I met many first time attendees who were happy to give their real name but not their posting name for some reason - I hope they had a good time anyway Good to see quids abandon the shirt for a far more classy jacket. And AnotherPaul made up for his non-attendance at the last 24 drinks by cramming as much info into each second as possible - twas a joy to be witness to it And brum and co.. you're welcome

Sorry, but I'm not having false accusations thrown my way I have not personally attacked you Kel, I have simply tried to point out that you are publicly (a word you seem to care about) making statements which aren't true IN your last post you are at pains to say which is very different from your earlier point which was those are both carefully constructed, pointed and yet contradictory points - which one do you want to stand by? I'm not reading any deeper meanings, I'm just confused Me asking that question can not be construed as an attack? I'm not picking on you, I'm simply reading your posts, thinking "that's not true" and trying to reply. With each reply you respond ever more faux-naive

I love my retro gaming, and there is some truth in RD's disdain for modern epics BUT Having played games since 79 or so, I'm pretty certain that this generation has provided the best gaming days of those 30 odd years, so I'm not going to get too nostalgic But for hardcore retro fun a genuine Missile Command cabinet is hard to beat

I'm not defensive - I'm just preventing untruths from becoming common currency. I didn't ask you if you thought the account was used by anyone other than admin - you stated baldly and repeatedly that it was. And you did that for a reason presumably? Or do you just write any thought that comes into your head? You barged into a thread and said "off topic but" and then made a false allegation - When Piers pointed out it wasn't true you tried again and now you are crying about being called on it? You COULD just say you were wrong and apologise gracefully

I liked the "only just discovered se23.com" bit - made me chuckle it did

And you feel confident making that assumption do you? If you don't want to make a big deal of something then why invent something like that?

ooh what happened?

you are sounding like a conspiracy theorist now kel if you want to be taken seriously, don't make spurious accusations and then run away

And when has anyone done that? This thread is getting more and more bizaare!

but it's about England's Brave John Terry! so that's ok And the rest is about Chelsea - so that's definitely ok And it's all true I'd love to have been a fly on the wall at today's meeting via translator: "John... John. JT!... all this fuss over nothing. You are still my captain. Just reassure me there isn't anything else in the wings waiting to be revealed..." "er,,,,,"