New Nexus

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ha ha - if you really believe that LD, I'd be > staggered. > > To be fair - he intended nothing of the sort. > > He used 'brain damage', not 'make-up'. He used the > word 'brain damage' twice. What you're indulging > in is called 'revisionism'. It's like getting > caught stealing and claiming you were only > 'borrowing'. ;-) The great wizard knows my intent now ?he intended nothing of the sort.? I did not say ?brain damaged?, I pointed to an article that spoke of brain damage. You really must pay attention. Please try and take time to go to said article and check for yourself. Maybe an afternoon nap.

http://nicholsoncartoons.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011-08-04_stock_market_falls_2_speed_economy_650x433.jpg

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Only someone with the petulance and egotism of a > child could imagine they could get away with > claiming that drawing attention to an article such > as that one is not the same thing as calling > bankers brain-damaged. > > You sound like a twattish schoolboy trying to get > away with an offence on a 'technicality'. > > Regarding being 'told you not to indulge me', do > you really you have a carte blanche to carry on > behaving like a prat? And here you go again talking with that potty mouth, If you are going to talk down to people, then please expect the same in return. Now go and have your juice-box and calm down.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So, fresh on the heels of calling these people > liars, cheats, and fraudsters, you're now calling > them brain damaged? > > Then iamhere comes on and complains about > name-calling? > > What do you call hypocrites who have absolutely no > sense of proportion, demonstrate delusional > messiah complexes, make sweeping generalizations > about groups of people, use fabricated quotes, > deny evidence, indulge in self-reinforcing > hysteria about the 'end times', and resolutely > refuse to engage in meaningful debate? > > Nutters? ;-) Oppps, wrong again, Mr blah, Blah. I have not called anyone brain damaged merely point to an article in the The Wall Street Journal. Now, I do believe your captain has told you not to indulge me, naughty, naughty. Now go stand in the corner, or sit on the naughty step. http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB112190164023291519,00.html

LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I remember seeing something about that on TV. > > I wonder if they would get similar results from > politicians or corporate bosses. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2003/07/08/bell512.jpg

http://rt.com/programs/keiser-report/episode-177-max-keiser/

The Price of Fear A new study shows people with brain damage that impaired their ability to experience emotions such as fear outperformed other people in an investment game. The brain-damaged participants were more willing to take risks that yielded high payoffs. They were less likely to react emotionally to losses. They finished the game with 13% more money than other players.

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And on that happy note, I am off to bed, not > before counting All those gold nuggets under my > goose-feathered pillow. Yes you need to be up bright and early to do all that front running trades, plus high volume skimming. And lets not forget about drowning a Bag of kittens.

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Frankito Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Ps: it was your friend, Nexi who mentioned MIT, > > not me... As relevant as most other snippets of > > information he has provided the past few days. > > Actually you mentioned it @ 7.57pm. > > As you are a back office staff then I guess you > really know any better. Pretending that you know > more and then telling others they need to do > further research. > > You have been exposed. Sorry the 7:57 was me Nexus. I was replying to Frankito

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Frankito Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > UDT, instead of nit-picking, do enlighten us > with > > your four years of market wisdom and no need to > > treat me like a naughty child, this one won't > be > > going to the naughty corner any time soon. > > > I have long suspected that what you know isn't > worth hearing. Now it seems you are throwing in > the towel due to lack of sustainable arguments. > > I do not know what MIT is but in the scheme of > things it means jack shite. > To Help. MIT = Massachusetts Institute of Technology, most if not all traders use these boys to dream up crap financial vehicles, like CDO & CDS, tin cans without proper labels, when you get to open them, you find toxic waste inside.

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > And for the record, I manage several Middle Office > Trade Support teams across a variety of products > and it's my part of my job to know what they do... > I haven't met any yet who rely exclusively on > 'charts'. Is that techy talk for something new. > > product (1) Crap (MIT) machination. Product (2) I cannot believe we are selling our clients this crap. Product (3) Call the lawyers, I need to cover my ass here.

Frankito?s brave new world. http://www.instituteofsocialsurvivalism.org/Main/What_is_Social_Survivalism_files/babycorporatejpeg_Clean.jpg

Snake oil salesman http://www.instituteofsocialsurvivalism.org/Main/OTS_Archives/2011/Week_26_Videos/Meet_William_Rockefeller_Snake_Oil_Salesman.htm Given your lack of knowledge regarding snake oil and the Rockefeller dynasty ? I do believe it would be best for all, if you did take up a trade in window cleaning.

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You don't need to challenge me on anything as my > opinions are perfectly rounded and based on both > experience and observation from both sides of the > fence; it sounds like you need to challenge > yourself to some unbiased financial education > beyond what you read in the tabloids as it's a > massive spectrum and, only once you appreciate > that and all it's different layers, then we should > talk again. > > Unlike some others, I am not on here to preach > however, when I read so much unsubstantiated tosh, > I just can't resist dipping my toes in.. I could > go on and on and on but I have said my piece and > hopefully planted the seed for someone somewhere > to perhaps question some of what they read or, at > least look at an issue from more than one vantage > point. And there in lies the truth - a fraudster pronouncing greater knowledge than all others. Sir, you are part of a lying, cheating, morally corrupt industry, that is and will carryon ripping society apart. You have quite clearly nailed your colors to the mast - your colors being greed and your mast being, selfish self-interest at all cost. Your truth be damned replies, are full of condescension of Sun reading, tabloid junk informed plebs and shows your contempt for all views, other than your own. You could become a snake oil salesman, after the collapse. Different family same attitude: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."

Huguenot Your arguments are floored; you are working on a misconception that financial regulations are being enforced, anyone can see this is clearly not the case. Financial rules are being flouted on a daily basis. You clearly do not understand what QE is and how it works, and the inevitable outcome of its over usage will be. If I setup a printing press in my dinning room and start printing ?20 notes, then start distributing these notes, it would be illegal, and the notes that I would have been distributing would be steeling value from the real money in circulation. This is what QE does. They cannot print into being money quick enough via fractional lending, they have to deploy this scam. Every time they print money via QE, the money in your pocket becomes worth a little less, inflation is when goods and services go up in price, deflating your currency using QE makes it look like inflation. QE is a stealth tax. You do not understand what SDR?s as they are now, you do not understand the SDR has by stealth, been converted into a unit of currency, example IMF effectively printing into being $250 billion. The SDR of 1969 is not the SDR of 2011. Emergency measure after emergency measure. The financial-titanic hit the iceberg 2008 and everything shook, we are now taken on water. (please see current events) Just like the titanic only a handful at first understood the extent of the damage, as the pursers walked the decks calling for calm, and the band played on. It might just be time to start looking for a plan B. Derivatives, once used as leverage and insurance tools are now being used to bash countries to death, the real WMD?s. Can anyone tell me when the fund managers, banker and speculators are going to start to feel the austerity measures? When are they going to see their services cut, their children?s education cut, their healthcare cut, their upward mobility cut. Once again cleptocracy rules. Welcome back to the feudal system. Do not take my word for it, do not take Huguenot?s word for it. There is a mountain of information out there, please go and look for yourselves and make up your own minds. Please all have a good bank holiday.

Santerme Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > New Nexus, it sounds like you have far too much > time on your hands. > > Do you have any practical experience in the areas > you are posting about, or is this all the result > of internet information overload? CO: ibilly99 Paul Woolley, a one time fund manager, and currently head of the LSE's center for Capital Market Dysfunctionality (sometimes affectionately known as the Princeton Economics department) who explains why things are on the edge of a precipice. His message for anyone who thought that Irene may have been a risk: you ain't seen nothing yet. "The developments in recent weeks have made it quite clear that the markets don't function properly. Things are spinning out of control and are potentially dangerous for society. Only a fraternity of academic high priests connected to the finance markets is still speaking of efficient markets. Still each market participant is pursuing their own selfish interests. The market isn't reaching equilibrium -- it's falling into chaos." Ps. Yes

MissNoodlesHats Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "There is however a good novel by an Italian > collective called "Luther Blisset" which deals > with the early days of Protestantism, particularly > the more revolutionary anabaptist elements, which > is well worth a read.... " > > Well well, who would have guessed ! A collective > with its roots in the italian communist movement, > a collective who grew out of an attempt to remain > anonymous in the face of the information age and > ever creeping political censorship and control w > ithin the media ! Anything interesting there MP! > > > NN.. Although a lot of what your are saying is > rooted in a lot of good theory, despite the > howling of wind from the 'local people', there is > a problem I think with this 'art collective > theory'. Watching the news from Tripoli last , > whilst gun fire echoed around the city, there were > some shots of young kids and adults sweeping the > streets, bagging up rubble, clothes and anything > else that was laying on a war torn crossroads. It > got me thinking about the drive within human > nature to survive and adapt. Maybe a lot of things > you talk about will come to pass but I suspect we > will manage our way through them. Changes will > occur , this Forum and those who sail in her are > probably even a small part of it. Outside of the > web links however and books from educational > professionals lays the grounding reality of the > human desire to survive, and to some extent this > may slow the wheels of your theory based > armageddon. I am not really in the Armageddon club, it?s more like, big change club, get ready. When the USSR went through it?s big change, it had external help and internal resilience. The west has a just in time system, this is not helpful during a time of change. Good reference, Reinventing Collapse by Dmitry Orlov

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Clearly.....! It's all based on interpretation my > dear and we are obviously on opposite sides of the > fence. I don't think I have stated anywhere that > KTnumbas had wings, my comment was a gentle > reminder to another bloke of the 'please be a > gentleman' secret code that some of us subscribe > to.. Somewhat patronizing to women, me thinks

more info

Frankito Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "vulgarity looks good on you" if that isn't just a > bit rude then you must be as brain-washed as > NN... > > Bring on the robots! not as nude as "then just @#$%& off. Alright?" Hope she does not kiss babies with that mouth

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Earth is square and carried on the back of > three, sometimes four, elephants. If you think > you know better and want to disagree or if you > just DON'T LIKE IT then just @#$%& off. Alright? > > (Sorry Mockers, bad traffic jam y'know, she said > in defence). At last your true colors, vulgarity, looks good on you.

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Sorry wrong again, Earth has elliptical orbit" > > And NN neatly encapsulated himself with an a piece > of irrelevance exposing his complete lack of > understanding. > > Can we stop indulging him now please, he cannot be > persuaded as he is evangelically trying to open > OUR eyes. *chortles* I agree, if you don?t like what I say ? just keep walking.

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry, you're wrong again. We're not talking about > the orbit of the Earth. > > NN said 'the world is round'. That is a shape, > no? > > Katie said 'no its not, its an oblate spheroid'. > That is a shape. > > So stop talking nonsense about the Earth's orbit > please. You cannot defend your views, so you just snipe at silly stuff. Well if you?re picking on this issue, then your leaving others people alone.

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > New Nexus Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > For all the posting sheep that bleep Bar, Bar, > > ?conspiracy theory? > > Do sheep bleep? Don't they bleat and say baa, baa? > Or are these thirsty robotic sheep? Do androids > dream of electric sheep? > > > > Theories are theories until they become > facts. > > No, theories are that until they are proven. > > > Sorry people, the world is round. > > Sorry people, no it isn't. Its actually an oblate > spheroid. Sorry wrong again, Earth has elliptical orbit

richardbach Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > New Nexus Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > For all the posting sheep that bleep Bar, Bar, > > ?conspiracy theory? > > > > When Winston Churchill told the house, Germany > is > > re-arming, and readying itself for war, the > shouts > > from the benches was, sit-down, and war-monger. > > > Just because you do not like something does not > > make it a ?conspiracy theory? > > > > Theories are theories until they become facts. > > Sorry people, the world is round. > > > is that the same winston churchell who wantred to > send in teh gunboats to quell teh strikers and teh > trooops to bash teh welsh miners lol good choice > of example lol and next ladies and gentlemen kim > jonl il wil lecure us on teh evils of > international capital I am not a fan of Winston, its just to demo "gallipoli"