HonaloochieB

chichi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- DULWICH PEOPLE ARE TIGHT. Substitute DULWICH PEOPLE for such as Little Feat, The Eagles, Free or The Nice and you have a Bob Harris Old Grey Whistle Test comment from the 19mumbletymumbles. Nice one Chich, as Bob himself would have put it, and indeed still surely would. Though I believe he did qualify Little Feat as having a degree of 'looseness' about them as well. He was scrupulously fair in that regard.

I know nothing about it, but the thread title could be a Fall song. Of course I've done this gag before, and I'll likely as not do it again-ah. See if I shan't.

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you are planning on cultivating an obsession, > at least try plump for one of the tried and tested > routes (a beautiful yet unattainable woman, > computer games, designer shoes, Star Trek etc) > > A obsession about the Liberal Democrats? That's > serious weirdo territory. Yeah, the dopey bast@rd, it's not like Nick Clegg's Ian Hunter or anything. I mean, he's barely Nick Heyward's touring keyboard player, IF he even has one. Love Plus One, you and DaCam, that's you and him that is Cleggo.

I Love My Baby 'Cos She Does Good Sculptures - The Rezillos

daizie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am not allowed to post in the offered section as > I am banned. Anyway.. Daizie, what exactly do you have to do to get banned from the offer section? What were you offering? I've had a couple of sendings off from the ED/Isues/Gossip section myself, but could understand why. I've rarely visited the offer, but if there's the sort of rough and tumble that gets you banned, perhaps I will. Go on Daizie, in a discreet fashion let us know why you became an offers section non-person.

It should reopen as an old electrecical shop, selling old electricals. For the youngsters, colour televisions, Stylophones, power-driven whisks and music centres, I mean where the flip else are we going to play our Dolby cassettes? There could also be a section for Dansette disc players, Teasmades and top-loading washing machines. We'll need the washing machine for our threads after frugging and grooving to the sounds of the Dansette, sweaty we'll be. Cup o' tea wouldn't go amiss neither.

Ladymuck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hey loosen up Mr. Boogie, they are only on El > Camino Doloroso - that's all;-). Thsnks for that LadyM, but that's an instrumentele malo du Mick Ralphio, mucho similari a instrementalos previouso. Swear to God LM, I love Mott The Hoople but when Mick Ralphs takes the centre stage, I plotz. There, I said it. But thanks and kisses for the thoughts. Also you will of course get a 'bump' up to 'Shadeswearer, 1st Class', I'm proud of you.

I have't watched it, anything of that sort will disturb me in some sort of way. Yes I just know it shall. In the most Private Godfrey sort of way.

TIME TRAVEL?? RETRO???? Will you keep in line people. This is an ill-defined click as far as definition goes, but a click is a click for all that.

They Can Lock Me Up For Loving You (But They Can't Stop My Face Breaking Out) - Faron Bilker

Mind, my first loyalty is with Ireland. Get Morrisey up there for 2011. Come on Steven Patrick, play up fer th' auld sod. Even if he just rejigs a previous song, Everyday Is Like Good Friday, Swede&PotatoHead, The Last Of The Ganger Men To Die, just anything really. Come on, Moz, it'd mean so much to us.

I reckon next years representatives for the UK should be the Sugababes, by that time they'll have shed another three members and will be up for it. Get SAW to knock up a tune, we're upper fifteen at least. Salvage a little dignity, anyway.

McKenna quested on the Danny Baker radio show when he was in his proper morning slot. The estimabe Amy Lame (that's La-May, in case youse are pronunciation difficulties), took a verbal rod to his back about him making money from the insecurities of 'people of size'. If he wasn't limping when he left the studio, then I'm a Dutchman. Which I'm not. Not there's anything wrong it. Hope this helps.

cate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think arsebrain is better than arsemouth. I reckon you're correct there Cate, I like the sound of that. A great deal. I'll save arsemouth for use as a general expletive, it's too good to discard. Still no response on the kissyface, though? Come on, plant one just to the right of my nose and let's be chums. Oh go on, you might.

katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry to interrupt, may I ask, dear HonaloochieB, > if you are related to the person who started this > very popular thread? > > Thank you. > > Edited to say, in your own time....finish your > HobNobs. No rush. But I am wondering... Hello Katie97, No, sadly I'm not related to the good PinkyB who started this thread. That should end here and then, shouldn't it? But before I leave, perhaps a joke...perhaps I dignify it far too much. A bar. Satan walks in. Satan - Pint of lager. Barman - I can't serve you. Satan - Why? Barman - You caused perturbation with those cloven hooves the last time you came in. These old ladies all they want is a cloves cordial, a shallow relationship with each other, and a game of bingo. You came in here, and start clattering about, with your hooves, and of course it's upsetting for them. So, on your bike. Satan - But, I don't have a bike. Barman - You know what, if you're going to take the piss, you can go to hell. Satan - Funny you should say that. Katie97, you have to understand, this is quiet humour, when I realise what that means exactly, I'll be sure to let you know. In the meantime just clench a fist and grimace like the rest of us.

cate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mr. Hoople, > > The first paragraph was for you. The second one > was just an additional observation to add to this > thread. > > Aresemouth? What does that mean? I was rather hoping you'd concentrate on the 'kissyface' part. But the phrase 'arsemouth', which I coined this evening refers to poor use of language and bad spelling. I reckon it'll catch on. The 'kissyface' offer still applies, assuming we were having a fight. We were, weren't we?

Jean-Paul Satre, that was the soapy old sod. Glad I remembered that in time. But in time for what? And what is the connection between time and memory? If indeed there is one. Or am I thinking of that other one? Proust, that's the lad. For some reason I find myself fancying a Hob-Nob, I'll have one and get back to you.

Lawrence Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > panniers..... valet > > Weak, really weak. No standards. A weak in a thread is a long time. Standard deliver, your money or you life. Hmmm. Holy crap Loz, you may have a point of some sort. Actually Lawrence (if I call you Larry, it's with the deepest possible respect, if not admiration), you could well be correct. You may well be the death knell (may I refer to you as Nell?) of this small gathering. And that of course would signal the end of this. This, that is what it is, in and of itself. Cripes I'm starting to sound a little like that French existentialist gadgie, can't put my hand on his name right now, you know, the one that reckoned hell was other people and wrote a book titled Nausea, the soppy clot.

cate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So that's your excuse Mr. Hoople. Just showing > solidarity in a mocking manner......why not lead > by example? > > Using loose instead of lose. And advise instead > of advice as mentioned above. I've never heard of > &c. before. Who uses that? No excuse at all, Cate, and liking the Mr Hoople sobriquet. Cate you appear to be taking a scattergun approach. Are you asking me if I have ever used the 'lose' 'loose', 'advise' 'advice', errors? I will go on record as saying that I have not, in any wise been culpable of that sort of arsemouth. There, you have it. Oh, come on let's not get 2 hung up on all of this. Kissyface? Seriously.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The really rather worrying thing about last night, > is that I found myself agreeing with Pers Morgan a > few times! That is more than rather worrying, Keef. Piers Morgan is a corrupt, talentless piece of filth. I didn't see the programme, but I'm willing to bet he was foghorning to the gallery, I mean why change the formula? But then, never mind.

cate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The use of to instead of too which Honaloochie did > today. I know, whatever the post, I was quoting. I also know that I would rather eat my own head than confuse the two (to? too?). A dickhead I may be, but that much of a dickhead? Not to likely. Regards too you Cate.

Still The Same - Bob Seger

Brendan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Me woggle?s made from Italian leather I?ll have > you know. Woggle you reckon? Eyetalian leather you say? Have me know, you'll have me? I'll be waiting on you. See if'n I don't.

ImpetuousVrouw Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You lot must be hooking up with the wrong people > then, cos I've had loads of sessions as good as my > fantasies, and my fantasies are fairly wild! > Saying that though, I've had my fair share of crap > too! I have to sigh, Impetuous, and reckon in my estimation, that you likely as not haven't had wild fantasies type sex and loads of 'sessions'. Hardly anyone does. Any encounter becomes a big deal. Likely as not it was a one night stand. Or a series of them. That's good. Or good enough. Most of the time people have to put up with these things. Still.

charliecharlie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > threads about bus routes..... > http://vancouver-pictures.com/d/412-2/No+Buses+Bey > ond+This+point+sign+at+Lynn+Canyon+Park+in+Vancouv > er.jpg Alright Charlies, I'll bite, not getting it. Colour me dim.