jelly

That's an open reply to all the cowardly emails I've received.

When one becomes a liberal, he or she pretends to advocate tolerance, equality and peace, but hilariously, they're doing so for purely selfish reasons. It's the human equivalent of a puppy dog's face: an evolutionary tool designed to enhance survival, reproductive value and status. In short, liberalism is based on one central desire: to look cool in front of others in order to get love. Preaching tolerance makes you look cooler, than saying something like: 'Please lower my taxes.' - Greg Gutfeld

@ Mick Mac Irrespective of my declared distrust of Islam, that was the point I've been trying to make. In any case, I'm relieved to learn that at least someone on here has an IQ above room temperature.

If you all open your minds and try not to be intimidated by my superior intellect we'll rub along just fine. Is Otta a Mohammedan?

The blue text contains a link to the source of the actual text, dummy. That source being a national newspaper (The Telegraph). Even Otta grasped that. And I'm trying to say that a) I don't have a post mortem, and b) you should know that in all likelihood I don't have one. But I'm sure the author of the article - or one of their sources - has seen a copy. It would make writing the story somewhat problematic if they hadn't.

@Otta I'd rather stay where I am and I'd rather not associate myself with a Zionist puppet organisation. Perhaps you might consider joining since you clearly need to get out more.

@MGolden I ignored your questions because they were idiotic. But if you insist, I'll reply. The coroner's office isn't in the habit of releasing the results of a post mortem so the day after their death. But I'm sure that a competent coronor will be able to assess that her death came as a result of her fall and not natural causes. Whether or not she died as a result of ailing health or from the impact of the fall doesn't come into it. She was in an environment where an accute duty of care is demanded of its staff. It's a bit like a policeman telling you that he or she will pursue the person who's just assaulted you after they've finished their cigarette. Her suffering was prolonged by the nurse choosing their inconsequential faith over a person in their care who desperately needed help. There's no excuse for that. And her family hasn't asked me to raise this on a public forum. Do you think they asked a national newspaper to cover the incident?

@MGolden I heeded your advice long ago. I no longer interact with a people whose religion repulses me. I keep my distance. I love living in London with it's diverse social, racial and cultural population. Good for you, but I prefer my own.

@Sheilarose Like with all people, my experience with muslims is rooted in social interaction (however reluctant). Asking me how many I've 'encountered' is disingenuous at the very least. It's an absurd and contemptuous attempt at distraction. I haven't discussed their faith with them in great detail because on a personal level you'll get bias feedback. The only Islamic scripture I've read is the Suffi. From this I've come to the conclusion that it's interpreted on a liberal basis, but on paper it preaches a hardline doctrine, an intolerant one at that. On the evidence presented I've made-up my own mind. If you'd actually read what I've written instead of concentrating on formenting doubt, you'd know that I didn't claim that you claim to have knowledge of Islam, so there's no need to answer your question asking me why I think you have, seeing as I haven't proclaimed that you have. On the strength of all that, I can only conclude that taking a leaf out of your book would make me look as stupid as you are.

@Sheilarose My views are based on personal experience of muslims and their backward faith. You?

There's no need for personal attacks. And I never claimed that violence or oppression featured in Dorothy Griffiths' tragic passing. Her death was a result of selfish negligence at the behest of a backward religion. Besides, my outlining the ugly truth behind Islam was in response to Marmora Man's waffle about it being a religion of peace, which it clearly isn't.

It's not 'trolling'. It's the truth.

The proposed measures won't be enacted. It would be in breach of both British and E.U competition law. A similar case was rejected in the Netherlands.

Bullshit. It's a violent and oppressive religion that breeds a stone age mentality among its followers who seem to object to being assimilated into their adoptive culture. It's the antithesis of western society. Sorry you can't (or refuse) to accept that.

:'( Alzheimer's sufferer Dorothy Griffiths, 87, was found sitting down after staff heard a bang and a carer went to the office for help to lift her. But agency nurse Abdul Bhutto, who was in charge, said they would have to wait. Carer Zoe Shaw told the Sheffield hearing: "It took between five and ten minutes because he was praying upstairs in the office on his prayer mat. A staff member told me we had to wait for him to finish. A god that demands prayer before mercy is a god unworthy of love. Slimeball religeon

@SJ Probably the same reason why it takes some people years and years of driving like an arsehole before they think to themselves: 'Hey, I'm not the only one using the road, perhaps I should pay more consideration towards my fellow motorists.' Some can't or won't appreciate the consequences of excess, some can. A big difference I've noticed while travelling around Europe and the U.S is that kids often have a wider range of activities to occupy thiemselves with instead of resigning themselves to a bottle or four of cheap cider on a park bench. As they grow up they steadily graduate towards the pubs and clubs with exactly the same attitude to alcohol as they did when sipping from a 3ltr bottle of aggrandised battery acid. Scottish Courage have a lot to answer for. But how far will the big players - like Diageo - operating in the UK drinks and hospitality industry allow this and/or successive governments to increase the tax threshold on alcohol? Because drinkers will only be penalised so much until they think (en masse): 'Sod this, I'll brew my own!' How much would the exchequer lose out on if that became the case?

Don't the holes in your shoes need mending, or something?

You should've been there when I drove past Harris Girls' school the other day. One young lady's PE kit looked like it's been in the family for generations. I pity the poor fool who's repaid with tales of drug dealing and gang violence after sending their daughter there.

Yeah, I'm such a 'loser' that I own my own house and can afford to send my kids to a private school. Unlike some around here who struggle to pay the mortgage and hinder their kids from childhood by shoving them off to the local comp where they'll rub shoulder with all the free dinner cases whose parents don't take any interest in their education or how disruptive they are. Loser? Dream on. I bet you all wish you shopped at Waitrose when you're fretting over the receipt from Iceland.

Then you'd be wrong. Unless your definition of a troll is someone who can't get their head 'round the tried and failed ideology liberals shove in everyone's faces.

But those black sheep among the left who don't think much of socialism (or haven't yet been assimilated) are far outweighed by their 'comrades' who subscribe to and espouse its destructive ideology. And I disagree, in that from my experience most "proper liberals" (whatever that entails) do lean towards a big, all-powerful centralised government.

I see this over and over. Conservatives are for limited government. Just because we say we don't want government doing things where government is inept, counterproductive, wasteful or whatever, does not mean that we should shut it down totally. Yes, we do need roads, bridges, power stations, motorways, jails, schools, the military, standard weights and measures, courts, etc etc. But not every aspect of the country's infrastructure needs to fall under the remit or stewardship of the government. The conservative view is that the government should be a useful servant of the people's needs. However, you give it too much money, power, authority it becomes the worst kind of master.

Just an innocent rant. No harm intended. @ Maxxi. Can you re-size that image? Otherwise it might crash the thread.

If you've been tacitly accused of this, can you provide me with a non-confrontational retort to the legions of ill-informed morons who don't see how much offence can be caused by saying that what I actually do for a living doesn't justify my salary? Experience reminds me that it's nearly always those who have a history of working for the public sector that level this kind of underhand accusation. I work for a high street bank and in doing so I put in an excess of 60 hours a week.I put in the effort and overcame all the trepidation that comes with getting a degree and got myself a job immediately after leaving university. I may work for a bank where the majority shareholders are the taxpayer; but that doesn't give someone the right, regardless of how much tax they pay, the right to scold me for earning a six figure income. To have some lefty entitlement case - who nearly always earns significantly less than those in my position - cast unfounded doubt over whether what I do for a living justifies my wage is galling to say the least. I don't "earn too much". My value my is directly proportional to what my employers pay me. So suck it, losers. Not you charming folk of ED. Just the ignorant serfs who I look down upon. Bwahahahaha

Seems like there's one or two liberal shills propagandising on this thread;-)