JohnL

Thumbing your nose is the 0.1 then. LadyDeliah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Flipping your middle ginger is aggressive? Where > the hell have you guys lived? Trumpton? > > On a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is hacking someone > up with a machete and 1 is giving a hard frown, > I'd put flipping a finger at 0.5.

You know when someones looking at you .. but you realise they are looking at someone behind you. It could happen with a finger :)

Sounds more and more pre-planned to me too - and less like an accident (although wouldn't rule it out) But where would they go, insurance fraud or terrorism and what would they do with the passengers. Somalia was out of range I think ?

I thought the avocado thing felt like it was a story I'm afaid. I'd never have time to do that - I'd just bin anything I brought which was rotten or past use by and check next time. I forgot Ice today (and I really wanted some) - couldn't go back - so trying small Tesco tonight.

Walked up Rye Lane on Saturday about 9:00 AM and it actually felt good - sun, banter, singing and clean. However by early evening many of the issues mentioned (rubbish, hair) were back. I see street cleaners most days - so don't know what happens really.

Every funeral I've been to blocks the street for a short while (not London however) A few big ones choke up the M4 motorway (near Margam Crematoriom) Nobody has ever complained - everybody is patient. adonirum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I once attended a funeral, with the cortege > leaving from the house. The bereaved had put bins > etc in the road with a note stating please don't > park because of the funeral and what time it was. > They were moved and someone had parked there. In > this instance, and taking into account some of the > posts already submitted on this thread, who was > right/wrong fair/selfish on this occasion?

Maybe its practice for when the oven or dishwasher can call the repair man itself.

You really need Ireland to lose - but apparently they don't often win in Paris. Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The week-end should be fun. Clive Woodward said > England should chase a 50+ points win, to catch > Ireland. Will France try to catch England? Will > Ireland win?

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mick Mac Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > > > > > Wales massively overrated and still slightly > > confused about their Lions domination. Lets not > > forget that it was England that went into the > last > > game of last year with grand slam prospects so > > England are a very good side. > > > Wales lose again. Never again should a team take > over the lions as if it was their own. They were > good yes, but never as good as they thought they > were. Great performance by England and it seems > only a late French try has prevented them winning > a grand slam (cant see them losing to Italy). Congrats to England on the TC - I actually like them at present - Hope they win the 6N - Certain non playing personalities like to wind up Welsh fans however. England had a big say in the Lions - IMHO - I could list English players that had influence even in the final game - it's a 23 a side game. Wales have issues with the new laws at the scrummage (I really would like to go back to the hit personally and I find it rather unfair that after years of one law, administrators change to something different 1 year out from the world cup - Gethin and Adam are maybe to old to adjust and might be gone now) They will be back for next years games (Cardiff and RWC at HQ - too many big players not to be.

Could be nobody did anything and it's a dirty tricks campaign. It happens.

Our work machines used to go into stop mode after 60 minutes of running etc. You could just start again of course - but I usually stopped then. Zenoria Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There's a sign up at reception about the 30 minute > rule but you're right, it's not very prominent. > > By the way, if you read my response I'm not > complaining about teenagers hogging machines. I'm > complaining that many of them are using said > machines to just sit there and text or chat with > their mates. There are plenty who are actually > doing something, I don't have a problem with them.

Collar it with the paper collars here. http://www.rspca.org.uk/allaboutanimals/helpandadvice/straycats

Doctors are all different though My consultant surgeon at kings reminded me of a famous football manager in looks and behaviour :) All went well though. PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Went to same dept the other day, with different > doctor and various attendants, and it was > completely different. He was kind and explanatory > and showed how well I have been doing and made me > feel very positive! It is all down to people being > allowed to be personable and kind and intelligent.

not good because lots like me will tend to 'just leave it' to fix itself

How can eating on public transport be a pleasurable experience (unless you're living on the street) - it's the worst sort of empty calories.

But the lady who has blown the whistle on MI5 has really shown how nasty they were Again http://anniemachon.ch/spies-lies-and-whistleblowers-subversion-chapter this is blowing open wide what happens - it seems to be true, El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm really not sure where you're going with this? > Not to Godwin it, but by logical extension are you > saying that the nazi war criminals shouldn't still > be purprosecuted because killing people was the > norm in the 40s? > > Weird frankly. > > You can brush up on logical fallacies and rhetoric > here > > I'd suggest appeal to ridicule, red herring, straw > man and undistributed middle for starters.

G?rard Houllier "He's pretending to eat grass" :) malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes, I want a blanket apology by all the major > broadcasters for everything that they may have > ever done wrong. WE as citizens should do > similar. I myself am feeling particularly guilty > as I once read a Daliy Mail headline on a bill > board, and I think I checked the international > Mail at an ariport once for the footy scores. I > apologise to personkind for supporting the > xenophobic media. > > I was recently impressed on the BBC Final Score > where both teh BBC and Robbie Fowler apologiesd > from the former's facetious comment about ladies' > football. However, neither Fowler of the BBC > apologised for Fowlers sniffing of the touchline a > few years ago. Clearly a reference to cocaine, so > the BBC support Class A drug use. As may some DM > journos.. > > Seriously you couldn't make it up!

I like Cabal, and has internet history (TINC = There is no Cabal). :)

if someone is trying to create cycle lanes that are separate to the main routes and joined up - could be okay Not heard anything like that though :)

4 front pages because of a historical association. No-one is obliged to defend themselves - and there maybe reasons why - they may have had enough of that period and don't want more of what they got then. "The ?sub?ver?sion? of cab?inet min?is?ters Har?riet Har?man and Patri?cia Hewitt was to have been lead?ing mem?bers of the National Coun?cil for Civil Liber?ties (NCCL ? now Liberty), the very organ?isa?tion designed to pro?tect us from such unwar?ran?ted abuses of our liber?ties." "The decision regard?ing the Exec?ut?ive of the NCCL meant that MI5 could invest?ig?ate an indi?vidual ? that means tap their phones, fol?low their move?ments, break into their houses, place a bug in their homes ? simply for being a mem?ber of the Exec?ut?ive of the NCCL," http://anniemachon.ch/spies-lies-and-whistleblowers-subversion-chapter

maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Makes a change for England to be the deniers > instead of the denied B) That happens in two weeks :)

When this happened to me - I saw it as the banks business, not mine. they refunded me - the fraud was against them not me. Sometimes there are internal bank issues or it's part of an ongoing larger fraud investigation - and you have no idea. The pub could easily be a patsy which is why the thread should probably go.

someone actually started researching this in 2011 (just before the riots).. http://www.rc21.org/conferences/amsterdam2011/edocs2/Session%2010/10-2-Jackson.pdf wish it went deeper.

I don't 100% trust the post - had something opened (and i think something removed) over XMas. Normally I let the bank do the investigations - and just recoup the money in these cases. Staff at the Rye seem a good lot.

I don't want to change whats there - doesn't bother me at all because I choose where I shop (and mostly it's boring Sainsburys). I would like some coffee shops and a few others which are closer to home (I think planning permission already granted for one (don't know what) - and the Magnet shop below Co-operative house is now gone - would love a little Cafe there rather than an empty unit again). Ozzies is Okay, Gregs has a few seats :) I think the argument is that this will put rents up and push others out (which is gentrification to many I think) ? Night time in Peckham has been transformed by the Bussey building events IMHO - but not sure how this is viewed by most. KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JohnL - what I was doing is outlining my > perception of what is happening on this thread - a > bunch of stand-still posters who want to ignore > the day-to-day use of a high street by it's > established community but at same time 'improve' > it according to their vague and inconsistent > grudges. > > The loaded comments about smells and the look of > food and inferences to H&S breaches are just a "we > are better than 'them' " monologue. Or are you > really seriously saying that because you smelt > fish as a child in Swansea and didn't like it, Rye > Lane should change how it displays it's fish ?!?! > > I'm hearing redneck comments on this thread and > I'm calling it that. Foxy is that straight-up and > honest enough for ya ?