Vicanna

I read somewhere that an area can only be classified as 'hip' once the postmen are delivering in skinny jeans.

Jimmyv Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You know who you are. For the third time this year > I have trodden in your beloved pet's crap? Please > clean it up. Beauval Rd is literally carpeted with > it. Do the decent thing please. It is horrendous You seem to know who the person that lets their pet carpet crap on Beauval Rd is, so why not approach them in person when you next see tham? Perhaps you could rub their face in any incriminating hound cables while you're at it, too.

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Where do you get a 2-bed terrace for ?250k again? > > Is access via a magic wardrobe of some sort? Just a poor attempt at sarcasm. Sorry if it caused any offense.

woodland Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's horrible. Sorry to hear you have had > something sentimental taken. When this happened to > my sister with a piece of my grandmas jewellery > the police suggested that she check on ebay. It's > a long shot but it might be worth it. Good idea. And it might be a good idea to visit some - if not all - of the local pawn shops or outfits that trade cash for gold (assuming the braclet is made of a precious metal).

Putting it bluntly, the incumbents (as opposed to the ambiguous "locals") of the Bellenden Rd area prior to the regeneration efforts didn't seem to give a damn about the social and aesthetic conditions they were living in (on the surface, anyway). They wallowed in their own mire, and new, forward-thinking arrivals grasped the push for regeneration and crafted it in an image they - as de-facto custodians - wished to project. It may come as a bone-chilling shock for some of you reading from a two bedroom terrace valued at a quarter of a million pounds (or thereabouts), but in the mid-'90s E. Dulwich was an eyesore. It was a complete dump. Then some likeminded entrepreneurs arrived on their Californain rollerboards one afternoon, scoffed amongst themselves at the plebian thoroughfare they'd set foot in and began formulating a divide and conquer strategy. They spread the word along the upwardly mobile grapevine that promising territory for a new colony had been scouted, and that anyone who had dreams of opening a sandal shop or houmous bar during their business studies degree had better hitch their wagons and head on down. Fast-forward five or so years and the stagnating businesses this area was notorious for have been pushed aside and replaced by a vibrant blend of new businesses. Colonies established by the Romans across their empire without a large military presence were soon abandoned or stagnated if they didn't attract enough trade. The same set of rules applies today. The only difference is that they now come with WiFi.

I'm amazed that no-one has mentioned Jimmy Carr's annoying - and obviously affected - laugh on 8 Out of 10 Cats.

It must just be me, because I'm not forced to back down in the face of 4x4s in East Dulwich anywhere near as frequently as the OP is suggesting. I rarely even see them. Though admittedly I'm not in the area during the day.

RosieH Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Doh! Must spend more time on the forum and less > moving packing boxes. Edited to remove my > comments to Vicanna, because, you know, life's too > short to feed the troll. > > Huguenot and seemster, good ideas. I'll explore > those. Short of that, I think I'm spending my > evenings trawling long term storage websites. Google "landlords and unwanted furniture" and you'll find exactly the same answers (or thereabouts) to the one I've provided you with. The landlord is under no legal obligation to remove any unwanted furnishings that were present at the time of viewing and subsequent lease agreement. I didn't see your unedited reply to what I wrote. But it wasn't my intention to provoke such a juvenile response. Either way, it isn't my concern if reality gets up your nose.

The landlord has no obligation to remove any furnishings. You've rented the property as furnished (I assume), as such you knew what would be in the property and let it as seen. The landlord may agree to remove some smaller items but larger ones are difficult to move and expensive to store, as you've found. You should have discussed the options with the landlord before taking it upon yourself to buy new furniture. Sorry if I've come across as being blunt, but it's the kind of response you're likely to get from a landlord that knows the rules.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anger? Me? 'S'if > > Just years of troll hunting. Anyone think vicanna > was a genuine poster? Really? Dedicating years of your life to hunting trolls online is a level of tragic I never knew existed. I suggest you take some time out to consider how to spend your time more productively. Perhaps even investigate the possibility of a social life`(one small step at a time, though). Other than that, I've got better things to do than indulge your weird fixation and paranoia. Thanks for the websitetoolbox, Foxy. That could prove interesting.

No, thanks. I don't want anymore of Jack's insecure anger. Ciao.

Okaaayyy.

I just looked it up but to no avail. Can you post a link please?

South East London. I tried Urban75 but they banned me for being too right-wing. Any suggestions?

Are there any other local forums besides this one?