snowy

But what actual legal powers under the Traffic Management Act do they have in relation to bicycles/pedestrians/horse riders?

Please tell us how many (out of ten) cars are currently compliant?

Minister For Transport Grant Shapps!

Who said this quiz: “There is clear evidence that for all the controversy they can sometimes cause, ambitious cycling and walking schemes have significant, if quieter, majority support.”

I would be a bit annoyed if i lived in one of the 4 tory boroughs that just wasted £1m of local constituents council tax on a bit of culture war electioneering against a Conservative policy.

I mean, lol. "Delivering a summary of his 18-page ruling, Mr Justice Swift said all three grounds of claim brought by the councils had failed. “I’m satisfied the Mayor’s decision to expand the Ulez area by amending the present road charging scheme rather than submitting an entirely new scheme was within his powers,” he said. “Having carefully considered the decision published for the purposes of consultation, I’m satisfied sufficient information was provided to permit those wanting to respond to the consultation to provide informed responses. “I’m further satisfied that when taking the decision on the grant to meet the cost of the vehicle scrappage scheme, the Mayor understood the likely provision that would be made. “While the consultation conducted was not in-depth, it was lawful.” the actual quote in context.

Those words don't exist in the judgement

Where does it say that in their summary? Point 37 dismisses all of the claims that the consultation was insufficient.

"I suppose what would be refreshing if one, just one, of the driving lobby who post here could agree there is a problem in the Dulwich area right now with bad driving - but no, it never happens and never will happen, because like so many things about the pro-passive travel groups they are more than happy to turn a blind eye to their own group's indiscretions and dismiss it."

Isn't zip intended for shorter local/regional use? You would obviously get a cheaper holiday term hire price from enterprise or hertz (other hire companies are available).

Here's barbyonabike's video collection of poor local driving: https://youtube.com/@barbyonabike Video from yesterday:

Shameless

This isn't true. TfL don't manage Waterloo Bridge. Its owned by the city of Westminster who moved the barriers as it was pointed out that having Hostile Vehicle Mitigation barriers implemented whilst also having a bus lane that terrorists using said Hostile Vehicles could still access wasn't meeting the risk assessment. So blaming it on cyclists is also not correct.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I know I am against racism > > I know that I disapprove of CRT as an effective > method to combat racism, > > I know that CRT is at the heart of the BLM > organisation > > I believe that taking the knee is clearly linked > to tacit support of BLM (in ADDITION...to being an > antiracist gesture) > > Accordingly, while I wouldn't boo taking the knee > myself. I do choose to express support for > different anti-racists > gestures/organisations/efforts.... > > I understand that most posters on here believe > that the Knee is a totally unobjectionable > gesture...and accept that as a valid perspective. > Why is it so impossible for those same people to > accept that my position perhaps has some validity > also (even if they dont agree with it)? > > There is more than one way to skin a cat. There is > more than one way to combat racism. I strongly > object to dog-whistle posts above which intimate > that anyone who doesn't follow the 'one true path' > is actually just a racist. This shows astounding > narrowmindedness, in my view. > > I donate money regularly to this organisation > https://www.theequianoproject.com/ set-up and run > by BAME people to discuss and combat racism in > ways which don't adhere to CRT/BLM orthodoxy. > > But I dont like taking the knee, so 'really' im > just a childish racist troll apparently. Just so I understand; to tackle racism, you fund Equiano - a private company with one shareholder. A shareholder who is an ?anti woke? (her words) presenter on GB News who recently said that taking the knee was ?a way to express your intellectual and moral superiority??

oimissus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > snowy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > oimissus Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > snowy Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > From looking at that boysvswomen site it > > > appears > > > > it?s run by an America right wing Christian > > > anti > > > > vaxxer. > > > > > > Do you have anything to say about the actual > > data, > > > or are you just trying to deflect attention > > from > > > that? It's very transparent. Oh, and a source > > for > > > that claim would be good too. Thanks. > > > > I?m not deflecting. You quoted it as a good > > source, so I went to look who was behind the > > source. His twitter feed is illuminating. > > Please provide a link to the Twitter feed you're > referencing. I've looked at the boysvswomen > Twitter feed, not sure what in that feed supports > your claim? > > Again - nothing to say on the data? Because, as > you know, it's the data I was referring to. Are > you saying the data is wrong? That the data > doesn't support the idea that women need their > own, single sex, competitions to compete fairly > (and safely, in some cases)? It?s on their website.

oimissus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > snowy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > From looking at that boysvswomen site it > appears > > it?s run by an America right wing Christian > anti > > vaxxer. > > Do you have anything to say about the actual data, > or are you just trying to deflect attention from > that? It's very transparent. Oh, and a source for > that claim would be good too. Thanks. I?m not deflecting. You quoted it as a good source, so I went to look who was behind the source. His twitter feed is illuminating.

From looking at that boysvswomen site it appears it?s run by an America right wing Christian anti vaxxer.

Should be noted that Lolaj is a first time poster, and fair play for women is known for its anti trans beliefs

That?s not true https://www.southwark.gov.uk/parking/parking-permits/on-street-permits/visitor-s-parking-permits ?Visitor's parking permits You can buy visitor's parking permits if you live within a controlled parking zone (whether you own a car or not).?

Count Binfaces last election manifesto proposed giving everyone a free bicycle so you might be barking up the wrong tree there.

So The Cat didn?t get the cream?

Hes not very good at percentages is he? He says ?UK exports have fully recovered? and yet presents percentage statistics that show they have fallen 15%.

The Mayor has no power over LTNs - they?re Tory party policy delegated to local authorities of all flavours across the UK. Active travel and ltns are in every major party manifesto with the exception of Farage and the local failed actor and some of the other potential deposit losing anti vaccine candidates. Their removal isn?t even in Baileys? manifesto. Latest yougov survey (based on mayoral voting intentions) shows 52% of the public surveyed support LTN and 35% objecting. Which leaves 13% in the don?t know or don?t care category. Details on p15 https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/yf4kwp7gmh/QMUL_Results_MayoralVI_210401.pdf And isn?t looking great for Bailey either - close to not even getting enough support to merit a second round of voting.

I believe rch said ?difficult issue? not difficult time. The rest of your post equally applies to the speeding car drivers ?disrespecting the law? and being stopped by the police on Barry Road this week.