Jump to content

pop9770

Member
  • Posts

    190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I know it's now a very peculiar opinion to think a pavement should be wide enough to be a pavement prior to being reported to admin I thought pavements should be for walking on. I'm so very weird .. I now realise thanks to the clever people in this thread that trees should be everywhere Bring on the middle of the road trees and the motorway middle slow and fast lane trees I was so silly ... Admin may have reason to ban me for my crazy views on mental illness and trees.
  2. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Enough already. Reporting to admin, you can't > just go around accusing people of being mentally > ill because they don't agree with your extremely > peculiar opinions. Ok
  3. Ummm I don't think Jamie Oliver is anti all sugar he's simply against the constant promotion of sugary products where there are alternatives. It's not the binary thing you see it as. I like him because he's very positive and he cares about what people actually eat. Sugar has its place in our diets in moderation. I've become a big fan of sweetners contrary to popular belief sheeple they are not harmful as a replacement for sugar . The anti sweetner thing causes me Rage especially when I get to a coffee shop or cafe and they don't have any sweetner !!!!! AGGGGGGGG
  4. Foxy One of the best ?250's I ever spent was for a skip to get rid of my shed contents. I realised every time I wanted something I thought I had in my shed I either couldn't find it or didn't have it it wasted hours of my time. Now I just buy what I need when I need it and use my shed to store tools and items which are of actual value. Cathartic
  5. that's hilarious I guess with the level of edumacation these young people get today anything is possible My best guess at why Sainsburys don't have young packers working at tills its that 99% of these young people in this country are simply incapable of packing bags as highlighted by Loz's experience and they don't want the potential damage to their customers impacting their reputation as mentioned there'd be a thread titled "Sainsburys packers destroyed my Christmas food". What a mad world we now exist in ..
  6. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm not trying to intimidate, insult or belittle > you, I'm just having a good laugh at your expense > as it was the funniest thing I saw on here all > year (for the uninitiated, pop used to have an > account on here as Fazer1973 or some such, then he > came on as pop saying "I agree with Fazer" - which > might have worked if admin hadn't popped up to say > it's not surprising you agree, as you are > Fazer!). > > Please stop describing people who disagree with > you as having a mental illness, it's really not > on. Ah so your mental illness is having a laugh at other peoples expense. You are showing the uninitiated you are not really very nice. As I said much of humanity is mentally at some level or other. I?m no exception. If you believe you are an exception then that?s a true sign of it  Human Sheep following the leader .. There are some who shout loud about their mad views on trees the ?sheep? follow and become part of the madness. Just like the acceptance of pollution noise etc. This thread is about a HUGE tree which is blocking a pavement and restricting peoples? ability to use the pavement. In any sane world people of any logic would cut the bloody thing down reinstate the pavement and plant a new smaller variety of tree or tress which are more suited to the location. But noooooooo we get mental people who think it?s acceptable that a tree takes up 50% of the pavement .. And other mental people who are talking about another time on another thread .. for some weird purpose which can maybe only be explained by some form of craziness? Hilarious
  7. Zebedee Tring Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Agreed. Mental illness is not something to joke > about or to treat lightly. > > If pop/fazer does this again, I shall refer > his/her comments to the Administrator. We're all mentally ill at some level ie on the spectrum of insanity that's standard for most humans Report me to who ever you like your god you mummy your daddy you administrator your wife child friend or work mates.. If that makes you feel better I'm happy for you .. If mental illness has become your taboo that is interesting! Why do you see it that way? What makes you think raising it in that way would help those who are at the high end or the spectrum or the rest of humanity? Or have you simply had a knee jerk PC reaction to my saying an obsession with ALL trees being good is imo a mental illness? I guess I'm not allowed to say being mad about trees isn't in some way a mental issue ? Why ?
  8. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That report is not evidence, you will note there > are an awful lot of "mays" and "coulds." By > contrast, a Leicester University study last year > found that trees can reduce pedestrian head height > levels of pollution by up to 7%. In certain very > specialised scenarios (very high traffic flow, > tree canopy providing 100% coverage, wind of a > specific speed and direction etc) trees can hold > pollutants in place - none of these circumstances > pertain anywhere in East Dulwich as far as I'm > aware. Please note this most important point: > trees do not increase air pollution, the pollution > is made by cars. Your apparent desire to cut down > all the trees on our streets and in our gardens to > fight pollution, rather than take measures to > reduce the number of cars, would be hilarious if > it wasn't so sad and so indicative of a certain > all too prevalent mindset. > > By the way, trees serve an absolutely vital role > as baffles for sound pollution, something about > which I believe you feel rather strongly. > > Happy Christmas - do you have two place settings > for pop and fazer, or do you share the same plate? I'm not anti tress ! lol I'm anti BIG trees in the wrong places. I've said I'd rather 100's of smaller trees cherry blossom type rather that a few large monster trees which are a problem in many ways. As for fazer and pop you really are getting silly trying to intimidate / insult / belittle me as per previous attempts very sad. I hope you have a lovely Christmas enjoy the tree hugging and you tree mental illness where ALL trees are worshiped regardless. Take care ..
  9. I've tried everything Pressure washing is a nightmare damages and the mould just spreads even more. The only guaranteed solution that always works for me is sika mould buster ?18 for 5ltrs which is then diluted it's a bargain I use it in a pump sprayer on a warm day with no wind Works a treat on patios paths roofs walls fencing and brick work. Wish I'd found it years ago http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/351563958922?lpid=122&chn=ps&adgroupid=36084540643&rlsatarget=pla-271887750156&adtype=pla&poi=&googleloc=9045878&device=t&campaignid=698615505&crdt=0&ul_ref=http%253A%252F%252Frover.ebay.com%252Frover%252F1%252F710-134428-41853-0%252F2%253Fmtid%253D1673%2526kwid%253D1%2526crlp%253D159563030297_563391%2526itemid%253D351563958922%2526targetid%253D271887750156%2526device%253Dt%2526mpre%253Dhttp%25253a%25252f%25252fwww.ebay.co.uk%25252fitm%25252flike%25252f351563958922%25253flpid%25253d122%252526chn%25253Dps%2526adtype%253Dpla%2526googleloc%253D9045878%2526poi%253D%2526campaignid%253D698615505%2526adgroupid%253D36084540643%2526rlsatarget%253Dpla-271887750156%2526gclid%253DCNSYieTKjNECFRA8GwodCIwMsg%2526srcrot%253D710-134428-41853-0%2526rvr_id%253D1144146911664
  10. uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's ideal to turn into a traffic light controlled > T junction Oh my God NO no no no Traffic lights only increase traffic they're the kiss of death to traffic flow Please Never promote that madness!!
  11. My Christmas tree logic has changed over the last few years. I now buy a tree as early as possible The logic being if I'm going to pay ?50 for one I want to get as many days pleasure as possible :) I've not looked back since adopting this approach. Merry Christmas
  12. rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Have you a link to said scientific proof please, > and more appositely to proof that streets with > trees have higher pollution levels in parts per > million than streets without? In a rainforest, > yes, smoke etc can stay trapped under the canopy. > We don't have rainforests in London. If air "is > suppressed at ground level" by trees on streets > barometric pressure would be higher on streets > with trees than those without. Which it isn't. Didn't you read the guardian article I linked to Here it is again https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/dec/01/trees-may-increase-air-pollution-on-city-streets I know ED is the guardian reading capital of the world so it must be the truth.. No?
  13. Well I've worked around most of Europe SE Asia and the east coast of the USA checkout packers are standard in most if the world's supermarkets especially during busy periods,. In the UK it's crap service as standard Imho It's probably because as seen above people here think it's not needed and most have not ever experienced it so are clueless.. Sad because the supermarkets make big money and don't spread any pay to many young people who would benefit from some pre Christmas paid work..
  14. Bic Basher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I seem to recall that Southwark at one point > proposed to remove the roundabout for a standard > junction with traffic lights. This was rejected. Probably too cheap. It really needs a big plan something costing ?500,000 + of local tax payer dosh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...