pk

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > keano77 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > diable rouge Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > AllLivesMatter!...errrr, except the darkies > in > > the > > > dinghies... > > > > Those words say a lot about you DR. > > You don't get sarcasm keano? i don't think that sarcasm is a good reason to use racially offensive terms

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Blah Blah Wrote: > > Ignorance can be a slippery concept. What is > regarded as knowledge in a particular era can be > shown to be incorrect as knowledge develops. The > atom was supposed to be indivisible, the earth > flat, the Universe comprised the Milky Way and so > on. > sounds like the argument of someone without much of an argument

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Disingenuous but at least consistent. > If you can?t be straight up, then don?t demand me > to be, OK ? Weird You posted something I asked you what you meant You went all weird

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk > Grow a spine and answer the question - you?ve a > gob enough to pursue someone else for an answer, I asked you what you meant and you won?t tell me You just bang on about me telling you what you meant That?s weird > so do it yourself. > ?what in the world did YOU think I meant in my > post earlier ?!? I don?t know Please see my answer immediately above your question Is it my turn for an answer now? You might better placed to explain you meant

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Here you pk, feast on that. > Now, what in the world did YOU think I meant in my > post earlier ?! You were very nonspecific so hard to tell but you were obviously dancing around an issue which you can?t tolerate when others do it > So, what did you think I meant - spell it out. > Or is it a case of you?re dumb now cos you ain?t > answering in full - seeing as you want to set the > bar there ?! Answering in full, I don?t know why you refuse to be clear about what you?re saying, cos eg ?various cards? is in fact not very clear so I don?t know what you meant but I think your comments were not very thought thru

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So alice you can do even better work by explaining > what you mean by your initial comment above. > That would be good work. > Says the person refusing to explain what they meant by their initial comment above

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You?re not dumb, just acting dumb. I think I just > said this already. I?d say maybe not being about to answer questions to explain your own posts makes you look dumb

I ask you to explain your ?various cards? and you won?t/can?t And that makes me dumb?

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That?s great, it covers the first part of my above > reply to you. > Now you?re qualified to ?..start at the beginning > (logical, right ?) and ask what is the intended > purpose of the ?unofficial moderator/side > narrative? nature of earlier post I was responding > to. And why there has to be someone always looking > for offence against well-intended posts?. > So go on, given your acute interest. So you won?t answer then. Poor

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you?re seriously asking that question and not > just being provocative, start at the beginning > (logical, right ?) and ask what is the intended > purpose of the ?unofficial moderator/side > narrative? nature of earlier post I was responding > to. And why there has to be someone always looking > for offence against well-intended posts. > Why oh why ? > > > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > KidKruger Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Johnie don?t be too concerned some people on > > here > > > tend to play various ?cards? to (in their > view) > > > hold people to account for perceived slights. > > > > > > So that people are clear, what views are you > > dismissing as people playing ?various cards? > and > > what are the ?various cards? that you think > people > > play? Yeah it?s a serious question, so perhaps you might answer it?

?We also need the cooperation of the French to intercept boats and return migrants back to France. I know that when the British people say they want to take back control of our borders ? this is exactly what they mean.? Priti Patel Aug 2020 Unedited

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Johnie don?t be too concerned some people on here > tend to play various ?cards? to (in their view) > hold people to account for perceived slights. So that people are clear, what views are you dismissing as people playing ?various cards? and what are the ?various cards? that you think people play?

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sadiq Khan wants everyone to live in > Self-Sacrifice / Self-denial > never allowing oneself any pleasure or enjoyment. > > > Contrite.. feeling remorseful and penitent. weird

Abe_froeman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If Sadiq Khan wins the mayoral election again it > will get even worse sadly. > > He is planning to cut police spending by > ?110,000,000.00 > > Shaun Bailey will stop those cuts if elected. > > . > https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/priti-pat > el-accuses-sadiq-khan-threatening-cut-police-offic > ers-a4516931.html you know that the article doesn't say what you say it says?

KalamityKel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Nigello Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > What's wrong with a U-turn? > > > > you don't think it's better to get things right > > first time around? > > And what is "right"? Obvs it depends on what the question is

Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What's wrong with a U-turn? you don't think it's better to get things right first time around?

lindylou Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I'm done with this forum. That?s good

If you?re talking to other people you should probably try harder to make sense And to have some idea what you?re taking about

LL - are you talking to yourself?

alice Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The standard wrote the police ?thanked the > marchers? And even the mail appear to be saying that the worst things that happened were someone wearing a balaclava and someone else telling a police officer to F off

Buxton Spring Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > not a joke at all its a fact but i guess radicals > like you find it funny . truth hurts got any facts to support your 'fact'?

Spartacus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > pk Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > If you?re not aware of the situation inherited > why > > are you so quick to allocate blame? > > > As I said, provide proof before defending your > position but the link below is from the current > mayors first year in office > http://content.tfl.gov.uk/tfl-annual-report-and-st > atement-of-accounts-2016-17.pdf > > I'm no accountant but the finances are shown from > page 104 onwards so if someone can work it out > then good luck although at the time it showed cash > in the bank 🤐 So in short, you?ve said it?s obviously this mayor?s fault But actually you haven?t a clue

If you?re not aware of the situation inherited why are you so quick to allocate blame?

Spartacus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > How is a ?13 billion debt "on track to run a > surplus" ? For context this article was the 12th > May, only a month and a half into the reduction in > passenger numbers so when the mayor got his > bailout it was possibly higher. > > BBC News - Coronavirus: Transport for London > expects to lose ?4bn > https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-52630 > 386 > > It's obvious that the Mayor's policies in this > area have failed but remember to TFL and the Mayor > of London every bailout is important. You think this Mayor?s created all that debt? Really? I?d be keen to see your evidence that he inherited debt free balanced books, particularly once you take into account that eg the previous Mayor received government support that his successor doesn?t benefit from and Boris clearly had nothing like a coronavirus hit income to deal with

seenbeen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Spartacus Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > I'm sure the tax payers of Manchester, Liverpool etc > would love to know they are subsidising London! You think that?s how it works!? Liverpool etc propping up London!