Effra

Try HSS Hire or use Hamish at "A Cut Above"

Please describe the symptoms and the make and model of the mower, then I will be able to help.

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It?s not just a Friday night thing - for me it?s > every waking moment of every day > There's a very fine line between such preoccupation and obsession. Trump was obsessed with Twitter and look like he turned out!

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don?t get upset if people tackle me directly > Nobody tackled you directly or anyone else for that matter. You bailed up like a rabid dog to the OP. > I am indeed free to move back to Ireland. Thank > you so much for reminding me. What a gracious > host. It seems churlish to point out that in the > intervening years I have English relatives and two > young daughters who wouldn?t be as keen as I am to > move to Ireland because they don?t have the wider > purview of where their country is headed and they > are VERY much attached to their friends here and > now > Surely there's a parental responsibility to full acquaint one's children with "the facts" whilst providing a "wider purview of where this country is headed" . Give them a chance to concur with your view that "the UK is foooked", as you say. If your views make sense, they will tag along with you when you jump this sinking ship and return to The Republic. You will be doing them and yourself a favour. Maybe better not to rush away as the vaccination program is not going too well there according to the Irish Time... ""There is ongoing pressure on the Government to ramp up vaccination, from the Opposition and from its own backbenchers. Kildare North TD James Lawless sent a memo to the Taoiseach on Friday, calling on him to negotiate any spare doses with the UK, as well as to get Johnson & Johnson?s vaccine in place ahead of European Medicines Agency approval. He also said consideration should be given to ?going beyond the [EU] bloc procurement? and also examining whether Russia can supply doses of its Sputnik V vaccine ?in a useful timescale?."" Seems the only thing the EU can achieve solidarity on is vindictive and spiteful retribution related to Brexit.

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > as for dismissing your views - I did that loooong > ago. You are the current holder of the "forum > reactionary who enjoys tweaking the nose of the > libs while pretending they are merely objective > and rational" accolade but your views speak for > themselves > > I don't think I'm playing the man by pointing out > that your views and presentation are questionable. > You very much pride yourself on your brand - don't > complain if someone points out the brand isn't all > that Be realistic YOU are the prime "forum reactionary" and you invariably play the man and not the ball. Just look at your first response in this thread. Thinks of pots and kettles! Also you said earlier "UK is beginning to realise it is Foooked". If it is foooked in your opinion, then you are totally free to return to The Republic and enjoy all the benefits of the EU.

Empty shelves in NI supermarkets, blocked shell fish exports from UK, blocked plants with UK soil attached and now Covid vaccines being impounded in Italy. After a massive debacle with vaccine procurement they seem to be lashing out in a manner that will surely backfire on them. But they probably think the "EU dream" is worth any cost.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would not (I do not) wear a mask to protect > myself, but to protect others, should I be an > asymptomatic carrier. Outside of hospital > conditions I would not expect 'normal' PPE to be > doubling as a hazmat suit. It appears you are > advocating wearing masks as a protection to you - > not to others. I would not do that - and if people > believe that their masks will be protecting them > (again, outside a hospital situation with full > PPE) then they are misleading themselves. > Your derided candle test at least shows that the > mask you are wearing will help stop, or at least > diminish, the contaminated spray from your nose > and mouth. Frankly I would not be relying on any > mask, but social distancing, short contact times > and others wearing masks, for my own protection. I most certainly do wear a mask to protect myself. If I protect myself and do not get infected then I cannot possibly pass it on to someone else whether they are in my immediate family or not. This consideration is further reinforced because my spouse and I are both in a vulnerable demographic. To enhance this protection, we both strictly observe the need to maintain social distancing, short contact time etc etc. And yes, if one spends protracted time in a high risk environment, then the mask should be discarded after 4 hours. At a retail price of about ?9 each for a decent mask, it becomes an expensive business. From a purely logical point of view, it make no sense to have a mask that is a barrier rather than a filter. A mask is only effective if it actually FILTERS the air and this can only be done by trapping the virus particles within the layers of fabric. This is precisely why the best masks are made from non-woven material. Woven fabrics have gaps between treads that virus particles can easily pass through. But don't just take my word, here is what the Gruniad said https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/26/non-woven-masks-better-to-stop-covid-19-says-japanese-supercomputer. If you have a largely impenetrable fabric barrier then the incoming and outgoing air will pass around the perimeter of the mask i.e. it will follow the path of least resistance. This is also why front-line NHS staff receive detailed training on how to fit masks properly. I'm quite happy to pay ?9 for a decent (scientifically proven) mask rather than rely on some speculation about blowing out candles. ?9 is a reasonable insurance premium.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- . Any mask you are wearing where you > can't blow out a candle flame will certainly be > quite effective - which probably means two or more > ply, with or without an additional filter Your "candle test" is highly misleading and outright dangerous. You could have a mask that is so thick and impenetrable that you could never blow out a candle. In that case, it restricts the air too much and so you are actually breathing air that comes in round the edges of the mask, ie air that is not filtered. The only effective mask is one that fits closely all round the face -especially over the bridge of the nose. That way all the air your breath is filtered by the layers of mask rather than coming in round the edges. Masks are graded. Do not risk anything less than PP2 (also known as N95). PP3 is best. The "candle bowing" thing is classic fake news. Sadly also, lots of people have jumped on the bandwagon offering home made cloth masks than frankly are totally USELESS. Every one should do thorough research rather than believe in hearsay!

AylwardS Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We had mice and after they went we put in an > earlier version of these. Seem to work. Maybe put > one in the room you want to stay mouse free? > > https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cheese-Repeller-Humane-Ro > dent-Deterrent/dp/B004QIRL8Q/ref=sr_1_12?crid=LC4P > EMP510P4&dchild=1&keywords=mouse+deterrent+plug+in > &qid=1607425058&sprefix=mouse+deterrent%2Caps%2C24 > 4&sr=8-12 As useful as a chocolate tea pot! Save your money. That aside, mice are totally harmless. It's similar to having a budgie that doesn't fly. They won't bite you.

I had the fake Royal Mail scam today too - along the lines of...... "we tried to deliver your package but but one was in. Please reschedule delivery by clicking on the link below." They had spoofed the sender's ID into Royal Mail but the underlying email address was sent from Greece!

"On January 1 2021, Britain will get a dose of regulatory independence, and the EU will get a dose of regulatory competition" Credit to Stephen Dnes, DT Letters today

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Effra Wrote: > Agreed it does not control when an > > individual country commences its roll out of an > > approved drug, but that is beside the point. > > I thought THAT was the point? You missed the point i.e. no EU state can start to roll it out UNTIL AFTER the EMA has approved it. A classic case of centralised bureaucratic control emasculating individual member states.

I pay ?95 for a 45 minute hygienist session and I think that's fair in the current circumstances where the room and equipment is sanitised after each patient. Because of the cleaning, each hygienist is able to treat a reduced number of patients. There is also the cost of PPI equipment which is necessary now. I consider ?95 good value and money well spent.

Go research the local businesses that have transitioned to on-line trading in response to the restrictions due to Covid.

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rule number 2...... never ever let a Brexiter get > away with mistruths, especially when they double > down. > > FACT There was no requirement for EU member states > to agree a unified moment for rolling out a > vaccine. FACT EU member states are free to make > that decision for themselves if they want to. FACT > Mogg, Dorries and Hancock all lied when they > implied that if we had not left the EU we would > still be waiting for permission to roll out the > vaccine. Sorry Blah Blah, but your take on this does not meet your usual standards of objectivity. The UK opted out of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to rid itself of the lethargic bureaucracy that pervades the entire EU. The EMA controls the development, evaluation, approval of new drug/vaccines in the EU. So no approval, no rollout. Agreed it does not control when an individual country commences its roll out of an approved drug, but that is beside the point. This gave the UK the freedom to analyse the data and react quickly without numerous group meetings. The EMA plan to have two more meetings in December to discuss this. It will be 2021 before they can progress towards mass vaccinations.