Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As much a sign of spring as the flowering of the Melbourne Grove cherry trees, the council's 'preferred' contractor Conway has been busy spending its unspent budget in the last few days of the financial year. Yesterday, without warning, they started digging up the pavement on Trossachs Road and replacing it with an inch or two of tarmac. It's unfinished, so anyone with a wheelchair or access problems would have been stranded. Much as it's nice to have a new pavement, in this era of austerity I'd have happily foregone a new pavement for a few years yet. But then again, Conway are clearly more powerful than, say, youth services when it comes to grabbing the cash.

To be fair, and much as I dislike Conway, anything left in the budget and not spent by the end of the financial year is lost for ever.


So it won't just be Conway desperately finding things to spend it on.


Lack of forward planning I agree, but it was always thus :)

Rolo Tomasi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Common myth.


Really?


When I used to work for a public sector employer, many moons ago when I actually had a budget, I had to use it by the end of the financial year or it was lost.


And so did others.


Not only that, but as BNG implies above, if you did not use all your budget it was assumed that you had too much and it was cut back in the following year.


Have things changed, then?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rolo Tomasi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Common myth.

>

> Really?

>

> When I used to work for a public sector employer,

> many moons ago when I actually had a budget, I

> had to use it by the end of the financial year or

> it was lost.

>

> And so did others.

>

> Not only that, but as BNG implies above, if you

> did not use all your budget it was assumed that

> you had too much and it was cut back in the

> following year.

>

> Have things changed, then?


Yes. I work for southwark and this is not the case. Years ago it was but not now.

Rolo Tomasi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Rolo Tomasi Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Common myth.

> >

> > Really?

> >

> > When I used to work for a public sector

> employer,

> > many moons ago when I actually had a budget, I

> > had to use it by the end of the financial year

> or

> > it was lost.

> >

> > And so did others.

> >

> > Not only that, but as BNG implies above, if you

> > did not use all your budget it was assumed that

> > you had too much and it was cut back in the

> > following year.

> >

> > Have things changed, then?

>

> Yes. I work for southwark and this is not the

> case. Years ago it was but not now.



Ah, OK.


I'm talking circa 1990 :))

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't believe budget allocations for Southwark

> COuncil highways renewals would be lost if it

> rolled over into a new financial year.


I don't think was the question. The question was whether Conway is working to a budget, and whether underspends to that would result in cuts to their budget. It's a subtle difference, but while we're not allowed to know exactly how our money is spent, it's an important one. Not least because it allows for the possiblity of contractors being able to uplift their profits without a suitably scrutinized civic justification.


Obviously, commercial confidentiality is important (though nobody has yet been able to explain why) and thus it's entirely reasonable to expect not to be able to know what the exact terms of Conways contract are. However, it is reasonable to know what the basis of the contract is, including whether it's cost, cost-plus, fixed budget or related to one or more variables, at least in the most general form. And whether that would mean they'd have an incentive to scuttle about inventing speed humps (or persuading their contacts to invent them) toward the end of the financial year.


I mention this simply because we live in a world where council tax can be frozen, yet council tax bills still go up. The use of a precept to pay for what we were already paying for, as not-quite made clear in the touching Urbi et Orbi from Peter Johns that slithered onto our mats, bundled up with the bill, is a well-worn wheeze, but still a wheeze. Its only purpose, for all the flannel about protecting bits of budgets, is to make something look like it's something that it isn't.


And, with all due respect, if that's what our councillors are spending their time on, then it's easy for them to find themselves serving the council's needs, rather than those of residents, and so might easily be persuaded to overlook the very subtle difference between, say, a council's budget and that of a contractor.

Well let's use it wisely and get some more speed bumps and narrow those roads! With a bit of luck we can get people out of those cars once and for all! London is a village after all so everyone should be walking!


Surely someone at Southwark Council or TFL has "good relationships" (ahem) with Conway and can get them to help us spend this money!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We have a very large collection - anything in particular you are looking for?
    • I'm thinking of going to India at Christmas and it's been 18 years since I last visited. So long ago, I can hardly remember where I went (I was there for 8 weeks...). Has anyone been to the South recently? I'm thinking Kerala, as we fancy some beach action. 
    • If it's not bolted down it gets stolen, terrible. Some people have no respect for others property.  Hope you reported it to the Police and got a crime reference number, what did they say? 
    • Try pavement, this is London, not the US. The Mayor increased his proportion of council tax in 2025/26 to pay for "more" haha PC's but my understanding is they were cut not increased. A rouse by the Mayor to take more and give nothing in return.  Troubling and far too common here.  Just be careful where you get it out
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...