Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My eldest is coming up to her 4th birthday. She's besotted by her dollies at the moment and has come across Baby Annabel in a catalogue that came with a doll she got at Christmas. (Correction, doll her little sister got but seldom gets to play with!!) I'm just wondering whether one of the real-life ones are really worth it? Okay, probably not worth as much as you pay but do the kids actually play with them differently than they would a simple one?


I remember a friend saying her daughter got given one that could wet it's nappy - but the nappies cost a bomb so she had to disuade her daughter from doing it (as even standard nappies could mount up in cost!). I'd probably do the same but it seems unfair to give her something but not want her to use it fully.


I'm generally of the 'less is more' frame of mind but open to be persuaded otherwise if they do really get more from them. And if so, are there any which are particularly good - or particularly awful? (I'm thinking as a parent who'll have to listen to it from the sidelines!)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10111-are-real-life-dolls-worth-it/
Share on other sites

You can get the baby Annabel without the wetting part. Ours crys and laughs etc and blinks and sucks dummy but, crucially, can be turned off. The nappies are expensive and I am of the opinion we do not need any more nappies to change in this house! ;-)

The soft body ones are better as they are more resilliant to changing, we had an unfortunate incident with a Baby born's arm whilst it was being changed....

Have a look at the woolworths website, I got a really good deal on this. Or Toys r us seem to have a huge selection also.

I'd be surprised if they could get more out of a 'real' doll than a normal baby doll. My daughters have the boring normal type, but as far as they are concerned their babies cry, laugh, eat, wet their nappies. I can't imagine it really happening could engage them anymore than their imaginations do at the moment.

We have both - My Sister got a 'real life' doll for my daughter via a Charity Shop. She plays with them all equally, the real life doll is quite heavy because of all the workings inside her body. Body is soft so dressing and undressing is easy.

I don't think they add that much value to the play, just a nice to have, if you can get on at a sensible price.


I did totally wind her up once by putting some peanut butter spread on some loo roll (to look like paper liner) inside one of her washable dolls nappies (Tots Bots do really cute pink cotton velcro fastening mini dolls nappies). She is to this day convinced her doll really did a poo, and can't understand why there haven't been any more since!


Tee Hee.


Molly

Her face must have been a picture, Molly!


I'm probably going to give in and get one, just for the variety I guess as she has other simple ones. As you say though Gubodge, the simple ones do it all anyway in her mind. (She's not long started all the imaginary play with them and I still find it so entertaining to stand out of sight and watch her!)


Next question though is....when do they finally learn to dress dolls by themselves??? I'm driven mad by, now both of mine, stripping every doll they get their hands on within seconds and then handing it to me to dress again. I'm sure the older one could do it if she tried but maybe I'm expecting too much and should just enjoy the fact that she wants to involve me while it lasts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If there’s a bank card or similar then call them and they will contact her.
    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/police-hunt-attack-south-london-b1247389.html Apologies if already posted on here - did look, couldn't find anything... 'The Metropolitan Police have appealed for help to find a man after a woman was seriously injured in an unprovoked attack in south London. The woman, in her 20s, was assaulted on Lordship Lane in East Dulwich at around 4.45pm on Monday August 25. She was treated by paramedics for injuries to her face and her jaw was broken in the attack. The victim was then taken to hospital and she continues to be supported by specialist officers. Officers are now searching for the suspect and are urging members of the public to come forward if they have information. He is described as a black man in his 30s or 40s with balding hair. He was wearing dark clothing during the attack. He is said to have approached the woman while she was by herself before swearing at her and then hitting her in the face. Detective constable Charlotte Kerr, who is leading the investigation, said: “We are working hard to find the person we believe is responsible for this senseless and unprovoked attack. “While we continue our enquiries, we hope our increased neighbourhood police presence will offer some reassurance to women and girls throughout the local area. “If you saw anything on Monday, 25 August – particularly between the junction of Lordship Lane and Chesterfield Grove at around 16:45hrs - do not hesitate to get in touch with us. “No matter how small you think your information is, it may be the key that unlocks our investigation.” Any witnesses or anyone who can help identify the suspect is asked to please contact the Met via 101, quoting 5018/25AUG or 01/7897951/25. Those who wish to share information anonymously can contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.'
    • I think, with schools, you really have to find the one that suits your child, rather than moving to a school catchment and then hoping it works. Mine both went to a high ranking and covetable school and had very different experiences - one loved it and the other was bullied and traumatised, and hated it. WE actually moved away because she couldn't walk around the area (yes - Dulwich area, so one of the local schools).
    • We live a little further down, on Pymers Mead. Traffic is terrible (always has been, but worse since the introduction of the Southwark LTNs). It's mainly the school drop -- traffic is noticeably lighter once the private schools break up  Have a few friends who live on that side of CR backing on to the train line. None has had any major complaints and the gardens on that stretch are fairly long, so you're not right on the line. Some have kids who go to Charter North -- its catchment defintely extends to Croxted Road. Other state secondaries nearby are Elmgreen and, of course, Kingsdale, although that doesn't have a catchment -- pure lottery
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...