Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If I've got this right ( the front of you house faces west?) Then the back of your house will get the morning sun, half of your garden will get the sun all day ( a south facing border) but the other half will be in shade - in the evening ( depending on the height of your house) there will be a sunny spot at the end of your garden to catch the evening sun and the sun will come in the front windows of your house. - Not too dark if you sit in the room getting the sun
Our garden faces East South-East and we get tonnes of full sun between Feb and Oct - it's only during the winter months where the sun dips behind surrounding houses and doesn't fill our whole garden. The front of our house doesn't get direct sunshine during most of the day, but doesn't feel dark because of it.

It completely depends on the size of the garden and what's around it. Even a south facing garden will be dark if its surrounded by tall structures and is small.


Sounds like you should get sun in the morning at the front of the garden and the back should be sunny in the evenings. That can be quite nice as kids can play in the shade near the house and the patio at the height of summer will be cool for when you want to eat etc without needing an umbrella.


I definitely wouldn't make that a deal breaker.

You should have morning sun unless there is something blocking light getting into the house. If the rear of the house has been extended and there are skylights / velux windows, you'll have light all day. Good luck with your purchase.
Check to see if neighbours have extended or have had loft conversions. If not, and depending how close they are,you may experience a significant change in light if they build later- especially if you are looking at a mid terrace.

As others have mentioned, it's not really possible to say how much light you will have. We have a north facing garden, so in theory we shouldn't have much sunlight, however, we actually have sun throughout the day as we have nothing on either the east or west sides blocking it out.

If the south side of the east facing garden is not overshadowed then you may get quite a lot of sunlight.

We have east garden (long) not an issue at all - I can only imagine it's an issue if you have the south blocked by surrounding buildings or trees as srisky says. April-Oct we get sun almost all day from the south and reasonable late sun at the bottom of the garden in high summer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...