Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Monday 22/3


FFJTC "I would love to taste the pea", again, what is wrong with the man? Save it for Graham Norton, or if you're short of money that Chris Moyles quiz show.


FFGTDB "Veeeery attractive plate of food...alarmingly lovely". Started off drawing him in, then startled him with its beauty.

Happens to me all the time with prawn cocktail. I think it's the Marie Rose sauce.

FFJTC "It's so obviously lamb"

Of course it is, and cooked in such a way that it fooled several of your guests.

It was ill-informed palates that were at fault and not your cooking skills.

Or indeed the quality of your, or anyone alse's meat. Not at all.

Locally sauced as I'm sure it was.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just a thread to drop in the critiques of Fat Face

> John the Cook and Fat Face Greg the Delivery Boy.

> Tonight I particularly enjoyed FF John informing

> some poor mare that her dessert, which had a lemon

> curd aspect to it "wasn't complicated enough".

>



Loada bollocks innit ?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for your reply. I have sent you a PM.  
    • It required legislation to identify the beneficial owners of properties in the UK held by overseas companies - and these still haven't been properly disclosed - ownership of things isn't just a google search away - and to suggest otherwise is not to understand how capitalism works. Unless you (cyclemonkey) do have access to that knowledge and would like to share.
    • "Mysterious owners" 😆  If only there was a powerful search engine at our fingertips to find out such deep secrets.        
    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...