Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you?re right Loz, they?ll have to pay up.


Thicke (the one with the horrible eyes that the record company makes him hide behind sunglasses) nicked the feel and groove from a classic track and added some unpleasant lightly rapey lyrics, making for a giant smash-n-grab hit that was instantly (and best) forgotten.


The Zep took a commonplace chord sequence and expanded it into an iconic 8-minute prog opus in three movements which will be played, basically forever.


Of the two, I feel more sorry for Zep. But it's still going to cost them, not that they're short of dough.

AFAIK The dude who wrote the 'original' had piped-up about it sounding a bit you know, inspired by, (especially since Zep supported them on tour!) but didn't feel sufficiently slighted to take it to court. He probably took the reasonable position that while they nicked the four chords, they'd gone on to make it their own - and then some.


Unfortunately he's dead now - and his estate (and publishing) is now in the hands of someone who SMELLS MONEY AND LOTS OF IT

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thicke ... nicked the feel and groove from a classic track


Well actually as I understand it, Pharrell Williams did... Thicke just turned up later that night, off his head on coke, and ad-libbed some creepy stuff into the mic.


I think if LZ can point to several other works in rock/folk/etc with the same chord pattern then maybe they'll be OK, but it's not looking good.

I blame Thicke entirely.. because he has horrible eyes.


I don't think Zep have got much chance of getting away without paying-up. Jimmy Page has already made it worse by saying he never heard the Taurus track until a few years ago, but they were on tour supporting Taurus around the time they released their original four-chord-patterned thing.


Same instrument, same pattern, the timeframe fits, they were in the right place, professor Plum with the candlestick in the library..

Spot on. *Bob*. This isn't new by the way. The lawsuit or whatever you call it has been happening for at least a couple of years. Zep ripped off a lot of blues artists too and never gave them credit at the time unlike the Stones who always championed blues artists and gave credit where it was due.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's another instance of the Zep "inspiration"

> thing.


> Which the Small Faces borrow heavily from.


> And then later Led Zeppelin come up with this and

> give themselves full credit.



Dixon got his piece of the pie on WLL in the end though - as well as full credit and remuneration on other Zep tracks.. they weren't exactly trying to hide from him.


The fact that the nobody bothered to haul the Faces through the courts tells the story: as long as you don't make too much money you're probably ok.


Secret Chord progressions and undiscovered melodies are thin on the ground these days. If all writers fairly credited everyone they 'borrowed from' - before even a deal was signed or a record released - they'd spend more time trying to agree the publishing then they would writing the music. IMO.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dixon* got his piece of the pie on WLL in the end

> though



* daughter of Willie Dixon, I mean. Same old story...


Anyway, once upon a time there was probably an old blues guy sitting in a bar playing his $10 guitar who can recall when Willie Dixon caught his set and then went on to borrow a few licks.

That Spirit thing resembles Pachabel's cannon in it's structure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOA-2hl1Vbc.

It is a basic musical structure like an arpeggio so I think LZ will get let off (I hope so or the flood gates will open)

The funniest example of this is when Malcolm the genius in Season 6 episode 7 of Malcolm in the Middle tries his very hardest to compose a guitar song and it ends up like the Miaow Mix advertisement.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a basic musical structure like an arpeggio

> so I think LZ will get let off (I hope so or the

> flood gates will open)


In this case, this is not a defence - and it won't wash.


The floodgates have been open on this for half a century, it's not new. Amongst the few high profile cases that make the news because the tracks are just so famous, there are countless others that are negotiated behind the scenes. The more money involved, the more horse-trading.


Uptown Funk is a classic example: starts out with a couple of writers and a couple of publishers. Becomes smash hit. Vultures circle. At one point this track had three dozen publishers making a claim! I think they've settled on ten writers now or something like that. Good going for a basic chord progression.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • thanks Jenijenjen and all - yes, i remember walking or taking the bus from the elephant (where i was working) to Camberwell to get there.  I think Tim - who's still at Franklin's -  was there in those days, and the woman who ran the cafe!  Other food places that i remember fondly are the ones in Neal's Yard (with the Hunkin sculpture that you could put a coin in ) and the basement lunch place at the Tottenham Court Road junction with Hanway Street... 
    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertised  times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...