Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The asking price should be set in collaboration with an agent. A good one should suggest the optimistic side of what's possible. The 2014 market was so mental that houses we were offering on were going for 25% over asking price in the sealed bid process. Agents actually stopped the bidding for two places we had offered on, presumably because finance was unlikely to be approved after valuation. We were in an excellent position, but so was everyone else. When we bought our first flat in N4 way back in 2006 the conditions were completely different; it was completely normal to offer a few grand under asking price for example. So I know rhe frustration.


What surprises me is that places are still going to sealed bid, as my impression was the market had cooled down.


Missing out on the house you had imagined yourself in, and settling for something that will do, sucks. You think of schools, transport, cafes, wallpaper, garden etc. and then poof, you can't have it. Good position, big deposit, great salary...nope, still can't have it. It's sobering to realise, though, that to be able to buy anything at all that's family sized in London is a privileged position, and to be able to buy somewhere that's actually nice like SE22 is the stuff of dreams for most double income professionals. And ultimately, wherever you wind up that meets your basic criteria, will be where you/your family call home, and so by default will be a place you love.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The asking price should be set in collaboration

> with an agent. A good one should suggest the

> optimistic side of what's possible. The 2014

> market was so mental that houses we were offering

> on were going for 25% over asking price in the

> sealed bid process. Agents actually stopped the

> bidding for two places we had offered on,

> presumably because finance was unlikely to be

> approved after valuation.



Should Agents make that assumption? not every buyer needs finance, although the agent may well have known the status of the bidders, in which case ok. Sometimes agents just want a sold sign up and move on to the next sale, commission earned.

Banks do valuations on places before doing final mortgage approval - allowing the ring around to run its course presumably runs the risk of mortgages not being approved not due to buyer's position but due to the asset being overvalued. As I said, it was mayhem.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair play to you Pickle.

> However if you have so many offers over asking

> price it suggests the asking price was "wrong".

> But the main thing is that you were happy. Your

> buyers will have really appreciated your

> reasonable stance I'd imagine.


As it stood we made a pretty hefty capital gain in just 3 years, and it helped us into a bigger property for a small additional outlay. The couple that bought from us have done similar, and also managed to stay in the area, I like that I still see them around, happy ending.


Interestingly, the same house recently sold again, having changed hands for the third time since we owned it. Sale price 125% higher than 10 years ago (standard 2 up, 2 down), and over ?250k more than we paid for our much larger house. I would hate to be a first time buyer in this market!

  • 3 weeks later...

So here we are again and have now lost out on 4 houses.


What is everyone's view in why the stock levels are so bad at the moment, especially round here? I know London suffers overall and planning restrictions are causing fewer homes to be built, but we are finding that hardly ANYONE in SE London is releasing their homes.


Is it the EU Brexit vote causing uncertainty? Or simply that those who are in those 3 bed in Brockley, Ladywell, etc etc also can't afford to move up? it's getting silly. Losing the will to keep dragging a tired toddler round every Saturday for a scrap of a home!

Without doubt the uncertainty over brexit has held the market back this Spring. Well below average levels for the time of year. I would imagine, come the outcome of this referendum, the market will become saturated (for a time) with those vendors who held back over the spring.


Louisa.

cantthinkofaname Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What is everyone's view in why the stock levels are so bad at the moment, especially round here?


Apparently, the BTL stamp duty change caused a blip in the number of sales in the first three months of the year. I can imagine that has soaked up a lot of the stock. Give it a couple of months and it will return to sanity.


Something similar happened in early 2014. A lack of stock caused a sharp rise, then by Sep 2014 there was too much stock on the market as everyone tried to pile in and prices dropped back.

From my own experience, SE22 has lost its froth, so more stock here, but houses sitting around for weeks. We simply can't afford Dulwich anymore though.


Conversely, the stock for a sensible average 3 bed outside of SE22 (so Honor Oak, Nunhead, Brockley, Ladywell, Sydenham, Hither Green) is really poor. What has come on in these areas tends to get snapped up, but then we're finding they come back on after failing mortgage valuations.


One plucky agent told me we needed to up our budget to 800,000 for a small 3 bed Victorian (nowhere near SE22). I told him where to go.


Here's hoping the Brexit will cause things to calm down. We may stop looking until then. Not going to get into something then regret it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I really don’t want to be a complainer, but mail is definitely no longer arriving in SE22.
    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...