Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Corbyn does the absolute bare minimum to keep the wolves at bay, but can't be seen in any way to be turning things around after GE2015.


Tories do a little better, but from a fairly low base.


SNP lose overall control of Holyrood. Scottish Labour takes yet another walloping. Scottish Tories do better, but again from a very low base.


Welsh Labour lose a little ground in terms of seats, but a lot more in terms of vote share. Plaid Cymru do roughly the same as last time.


LibDems do a tiny, weeny bit better in England and Scotland.


UKIP benefited from electoral change in Wales. They also increase their vote share, but still not converting these into results.


Did anyone actually do enough to claim a good day at the polls?

I think it's very clear Labour under Corbyn are generally doing a fair bit better than the media (and half the PLP) are predicting in both local and bi-elections, certainly not catasrophic as was being punted last night BUT a share of 31% of vote vs Tories 30% is not gonna win them any general elections.


Tories success in Scotland (and Labour's failure) is more important than you say Loz - there' has been some detoxifying of the Tories in Scotland and that is big change. How Labour get Scotland back now is beyond me....Corbyn had no effect here as the SNP predicted


Middle-class (momentum) activism is more powerful in the South East, not just London, than many realise, but my feel is that will be less significant in a General Election


Interesting nuance - Labour maintained control in Southampton but on the ground they lost a seat to the tories in a working class area but gained one from them in middle-class area near the University...speaks volumes of where Corbyn's appeal is.


For someone who didn't vote yesterday or in the GE I do like following all this stuff :)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Tories success in Scotland (and Labour's failure) is more important than you say Loz - there' has

> been some detoxifying of the Tories in Scotland and that is big change. How Labour get Scotland

> back now is beyond me....Corbyn had no effect here as the SNP predicted


I thought the interesting thing in Scotland was the amount of anti-SNP tactical voting going on. I think Labour, Tories and the LibDems all picked up seats that would have usually gone to the SNP.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting nuance - Labour maintained control in

> Southampton but on the ground they lost a seat to

> the tories in a working class area but gained one

> from them in middle-class area near the

> University...speaks volumes of where Corbyn's

> appeal is.




Indeed, and this is also why UKIP are taking large numbers of Labour voters all over the place.

I half wonder if it's just what happens when you go from a two party state to one that has two other parties that have been really successful in splitting the electorate.


On Scotland, I don't think Labour from Westminster can ever fix that. It will be down to Scottish Labour to figure a way back.


But Labour have never won enough seats in England alone and in many ways they have to appeal to so many different (now polarised groups) that it's hard to see how that can be done under a left of centre leadership.


Having said that, the Tories have exactly the same problem. It's hard to see them ever winning a decent majority as things stand either. They too have too narrow an appeal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...