Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last evening the 'phone went and a woman asked for 'Baz', as that's a nickname of mine I confirmed I was he.

The caller seemed a little confused and said she had the wrong number, I thought the voice sounded familiar and asked her name. "Michelle" she replied. As in Michelle OBAMA.

We laughed at the coincidence and fell into conversation, for at least twenty minutes.

I recommended where she could get Ben Sherman shirts for Barack and gave her some rhyming slang to liven up the those dull official functions and also my idea for she and Sigourney Weaver to perform a thrash metal duet of Ebony And Ivory.

Anyway she was charm itself, but if you see Gordon don't tell him, he doesn't need his chips pissed on any more.

Interesting question Santerme. I think Roosevelt had been manoevering that way since '39 but without Germany's declaration it would have been a much harder sell.

Sympathy with Germany was wider than that for Britain despite the best efforts of Greer Garson, but Roosevelt was well aware that betterthw devil you know and was determined not to allow Europe to be the property of Nazi Germany.


One of the great tragedies was his death, I think the whole cold war could have been avoided (I'm not saying the US and USSR would have been pals or anything) if Truman hadn't come to power with little knowledge of the wider world and happy to listen to a bunch of advisers equally out of their depth interpret everything through a bipolar lens.

All speculation of course mockney but my understanding was that a mixture of his (Roosevelt) illness but also a bit of being hoodwinked by Uncle Jo meant that that wouldn't have necessarily have happened...by the last big conference of the war (Yalta?), Churchill was pushing for a tougher stance against Stalin in the "what we do after it's over 'suggestions'" than Roosevelt but by then GB was playing third fiddle

All what ifs are speculatio. Quids but I think this ones fairly robust in terms of historical analysis.

Yalta was the penultimate summit (a term coined by Churchill I believe) and Roosevelt's last.


Potsdam was the last one set amidst the destruction of war. It was where Truman was informed of the success of the Manhatten Project but uncle Joe knew all about it anyway 'use it we'll I think he said.


I think the cold war more or less kicked off in '47 as Truman was never able or willing to understand the complexities and a them and us interpretation was much easierto understand than the panoply of grievances, complex internal politics of countries, not to mention the legacy grievances and unfinished businesses of various occupations/resistances/cooperations and collaboratons that fed the many crises and conflicts across Europe, Asia, North Africa and the middle east that were burgeoning everywhere. Communist aggression was so much easier to understand.


For us or against us, sound familiar. clever people rarely achieve a great deal as they try to negotiatethere way through difficult roads. It's always the simple guys looking for simple solutions that look like they're progressing more but actually causing more trouble than they can predict. I refer as much to Blair as to Bush. Both intelligent blokes by all accounts, one trusted his advisers, like Truman, the other trusted his own instincts and principal while famously knowing very little about history.


Anyway I blather, this story is much more entertaining

http://news.BBC.co.uk/1/hi/England/Dorset/8272799.STM

...'drunk on swine flu gel'


"...In March, Royal Bournemouth Hospital said it was one of many hospitals removing alcohol-based hand cleaning gel from reception areas in a bid to stop visitors drinking it..."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/dorset/8272799.stm

I cant believ anyone as corrupt and odious, a proven liar no less, is given a platform like that.


But yeah, the first analogy simply makes you discount anything else he says in the hugely unlikely event that he has anything useful to add ... to anything.

Satanism!


Satanism I tell you.


A dog eared Harry Potter book found under the bed is a sure sign that your teenage offspring has plans to sacrifice you in your sleep to the Whore of Babylon, Beelzebub and that English guy from Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...