Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all - your wordly advice and knowledge required!


I'm back to work in June and need to sort out childcare for my little boy who will be coming up to 9 months old then. I'm sure there are plenty of people who will tell me Ive left it far to late - but i'm new to all this and the realities that the waiting lists are years long etc. are a bit of shock to be honest!


So could people expain the difference between childminders and nanny share and what these are likely to cost? Any nurseries I should avoid? What sort of checks I can make on childminders and nurseries?


And any other general pearls of wisdom you can share would be fab!


Thanks

Nicky

childminder - works at their own home, is inspected and registered with Ofsted and with Southwark. List can be got from the council Children's department. Can only take one child under one, will be a mix of other children there too probably. Homely environment, your child will have to fit in with the others, and will go on school runs and drop offs with the minder and the other children. Prices vary wildly.


Nanny works at your house, or the home of the people you share with. Can be OFsted registered but doesn't have to be. If your employer offers childcare vouchers in lieu of part of your salary then you need an Ofsted registered nanny to pay her (usually a her) with the vouchers. All registered child minders could take childcare vouchers, some may prefer not to tho. Depending on whether you share or not you either have one-on one care for your child, or a modified form of the childminder experience. Simply Childcare, EDF and Gumtree seem like good sources. Could be that you havethe nanny exclusively 3 days, and another family has her 2 days, or she looks after 2 or 3 children from 2 families at the same time.


Nursery - not many options for under ones in SE22, all registered and ofsted inspected, again prices vary wildly. You may be able to get a place at a nursery near your workplace, or if working in hospital have a creche similar there. You may get lucky with nusery as often they prefer you now with cash ready than holding a place for someone who won't pay anything til 6 months' time.


You have to do what works best for you. I've done all 3 options over the years. They are all running a business and every family has different needs and priorities for their child. keep an open mind and get on the phone to Southwark! Good luck

Au pair can be a good option as well if you have the space and are happy to have someone living with you. Usually 18-25 years old girls who are not qualified nannies or Ofsted registered but often have some childcare experience and you can specify your requirements. A lot like a nanny but no experience :). There have bee some threads about au pairs here; do a search and you'll find more info if you're interested.
I would think carefully about hiring a nanny yourself at this point - it's such a big responsibility with all the contracts and tax etc. If you are a nanny 'virgin' see if you can join as established share - that way you get someone already vetted and you probably won't need to take primary responsibility for all the admin etc. If you can find a family with a child a similar age, it can work beautifully as they grow up together. A really great childminder is another good option and definitely one I would prefer over nursery for this age. For nannyshare and childminders, I think it works out as between ?55 - ?70 a day,

sillywoman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it true that it's not legal for an Au-Pair to

> have sole charge of under 2's - or is it another

> urban myth?



It's something I've read on several nanny agency websites - have looked for more "official" information, but haven't been able to find it on a cursory search.

I got a list of registered childminders in SE22 and SE17 (where I work) from the council but ended up finding my (wonderful) childminder by placing an ad on this forum.


I don't think you've left it too late for a childminder (or a nanny share?)- I found mine about a month before I was due back at work!


Good luck!

It is illegal to employ an au pair for sole care of babies- or at least if you look at au pair agency web sites - such as "au pair world - it is"-if you think about it they are often 17-19 year olds that have lived at home and now often coming abroad for the first time to improve their english. They have no first aid training they will not know about swimming lessons, one o clock clubs etc etc. If you have to use a nursery and need "wrap around care" then an au pair can help ( as some nurseries keep shorter hours than a working day if you have to travel into the city).

Try Simply Childcare website or give them a ring they are terribly helpful. You are not too late at all. Or below for definition of au au pair linkpairs

Au pairs aren't supposed to have sole charge of preschoolers at all... but I don't see that it would be "illegal"


I don't know whether the ternm siof their visa would prohibit working more thna 25h p/w though. AS they are untrained, prob not the best option for a small baby!


Minders are best for under 2s, IMO

nickyp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks all so helpful!! I think the childminder is

> my peferred route but no ideal response to my ad

> on the forum yet so any other ways to find them

> much appreciated and will check out the

> suggestions above.



Childcare Link, via the web... and list from Southwark. Also look on noticeboards in library, cafes etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Have just been rudely woken up by a scam artist who must have knocked on my door 100 times... Description: late 20's-early 30's, London accent, lightly tanned skin, around 5"6 broad chested and overweight, light brown/dark cream coloured jacket and dark trousers, trainers. Looks and sounds like he'd just come out of prison. Claimed to be "working with the builders down the road" clearing their garden - despite there being no work done on our street at present! Quickly became rude and abusive when his pathetic ruse was called out. An unpleasant turd in human form. Have informed 101 who couldn't seem more disinterested. Warn any vulnerable friends/relatives I guess.
    • I'm confused. If there are no lifts, does that mean people who are in wheelchairs or who otherwise can't easily  walk, or who have heavy wheeled cases which they can't lift up and down stairs,  can't use Peckham Rye station? I'd have thought that was against some or other disability legislation?
    • Whose priorities? Peckham Rye station is operated by Southern Railway. Southwark Council doesn’t own or operate the station, and it can't force Southern or anyone else to install lifts at the station. I'd love there to be lifts at Peckham Rye. It would be very expensive.
    • Anything that improves the front of the station has to be a good thing. Opening up the square in front is a superb idea, it will show the beauty of the architecture of the station, just as they did at Kings Cross when they ripped out the monstrosity of the 1960's frontage and now the station gleams. People probably go there to see the beauty of it. Now wouldn't it be good if once opened up and cleaned up, people visited to see how wonderful it then looks. I guess there is a generally lack of trust that the station square will open by the end of next year, HOWEVER, when the current frontage is removed and the square is opened up as it originally was it will look grand.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...