Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm a fan of the hospital and the help it has given me over the years, but I thought it was interesting that people would like the site to be used for something else because Kings is so near.


One of my main concerns about the massive baby boom in the area is that in 5-10 years we'll be in trouble because there are practically no secondary schools in the immediate area - for girls at least. There's a shiny new boys academy on the Rye but that's no good to my daughter who will have to travel quite some distance when she gets to secondary age (depending on which school she manages to get into).


I think the old hospital site would make a great school. Don't know if any of you are aware of people in other areas who have been campaigning for/starting their own schools? Aided by this group http://www.newschoolsnetwork.org/ . I also saw a group of parents in North London recently who were trying to force a PCT to sell an empty hospital so they could start their own school. I know very little about the process, but it was just a thought.

Some positive thought would indeed be most welcome, no doubt, as this has been a very sorry affair to date.


It would be interesting to have a definitive statement from the PCT - as per the abject failings to date - and further what it is they are planning for all or part of the demolished site - and furthermore for the site and buildings as a whole. It's a great shame they demolished the original buildings before they could assure a replacement - that building could have been used for other community uses - a school as suggested above for instance - but that opportunity has needlessly been lost.


We need local politicians to get a grip on this situation and the PCT as a whole for that matter - to assure we do not end up with nothing of community worth.

I am sure you are right, Heft, regarding secondary girls schools but there are a number of coeducational schools and the girls school over the other side of Peckham Rye (it may not be ideal for your child but schools can change at an incredibly fast rate). Are we in fact missing a primary school that could fit on this site?

Hi Ruffer - I started this thread - not to promote what I think should happen - but to raise the local publics awareness of the issue - how people have been poorly served - and that if they care - to start a full debate on the future of the site and it's management - it is in theory public land / a public asset - held in trust by the PCT.


As you ask though - I personally think that we should have a significant medical facility there Though some have pointed out that we have Kings just over the Hill - we have a huge and growing population in this part of London - and do / will need additional and complementary services to the main hub at kings.


Best

Martin

No, actually I'm not keen on single sex and would always push for co-ed. I don't know if primary or secondary is more needed and would be happy to see either kind of school go in this space.


I may do a freedom of information request to Southwark Council to see how many miles children have to travel to both primary and secondary schools in the area. That way we might know which is more necessary.


My daughter isn't even at school yet, which may explain why I'm not aware of all the secondary schools around me. I'm just thinking ahead...

Heft Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm a fan of the hospital and the help it has

> given me over the years, but I thought it was

> interesting that people would like the site to be

> used for something else because Kings is so near.

>

> One of my main concerns about the massive baby

> boom in the area is that in 5-10 years we'll be in

> trouble because there are practically no secondary

> schools in the immediate area - for girls at

> least. There's a shiny new boys academy on the

> Rye but that's no good to my daughter who will

> have to travel quite some distance when she gets

> to secondary age (depending on which school she

> manages to get into).

>

> I think the old hospital site would make a great

> school. Don't know if any of you are aware of

> people in other areas who have been campaigning

> for/starting their own schools? Aided by this

> group http://www.newschoolsnetwork.org/ . I also

> saw a group of parents in North London recently

> who were trying to force a PCT to sell an empty

> hospital so they could start their own school. I

> know very little about the process, but it was

> just a thought.




Could not agree more. Perhaps many of our councillors could take this up?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...