Jump to content

Recommended Posts

interesting question - money, space, age, limited time and attention for more children, all these aspects will impact it. Il be interested to see what people think.


I always thought the ideal family would be - B, G, G


I do however know someone who had 5 children. The middle ones were triplets and were premature hence she had 5 children under 3 years old at one point!

It's odd this notion that 3 is bad number...middle child syndrome and all that. I am one of two as is my husband and we both wanted more than two as we could see the down side of being just 'one of two'. Personally I think the number of children you have and their future childhood experience is much more to do with the parenting and love that the child/children experience than how many siblings they may or may not have.

Three would be our ideal (Mr Smiler is a happy middle child and I would have liked more siblings). But have had some problems trying to have our second child and will be very happy if all continues to go well with my current pregnancy and we are able to have our second.


An even bigger factor for me, though, than money/space/fertility issues is the sleep deprivation. I have never, at any point, felt OK or even halfway OK since the birth of our daughter two years ago. Am like a zombie/blob-like marshmallow in brain and body, and sleep is still a problem. Assuming a similar experience with any future kids, two more kids with two years of bad sleeping each could potentially tot up to six years of sleep deprivation. Not to mention over-lapping night wake-ups between them. Don't think we could take it! Fingers crossed for a dream-sleeper this time, then we may reconsider...


Being pregnant with a toddler is also even harder than I thought, especially changing filthy nappies and dealing with vomiting bugs etc. when have nausea - bleugh!

Oh Smiler - I really do feel for you!! I love the idea of 4 grown up children (2 girls, 2 boys) who all get on famously well and come to visit for my delicious Sunday lunches. So my 'fantasy' would be 4.


The reality is: I had one because I wanted kids (in that sort of vague way you want kids, not knowing quite why) and then we are having a second because I thought she would benefit from a sibling, and once again thought in some vague way that another one was the right thing to do. I am hoping once we have two, I will be blessed with strong feelings to stick at 2, as a 3 child family brings all sorts of new practical requirements I just can't quite cope with. And I am done with giving up beer for months on end; it's frankly no way to live!

Yes Sillywoman, I'm assuming limitless money would mean plenty of help affordable too, in which case, maybe I'd go with what I said in my 20's and have 6 like my Mum did! Though maybe I'd have stuck at 4 (imagining plenty of time to 'pop to the gym' etc. to reclaim figure whilst nanny entertains the Walton style family!!).


But like Smiler, for me the other big issue is fertility, I just don't want to ever have another miscarriage....and also....having a baby at 40 is very different to having one at 35....I feel tired down to my bones most of the time, and I seriously am not sure I'd be able to do it all again, should have got on with it sooner I guess.....sigh.


So.....two will be it for us.....


Molly

I can't even imagine having 6!


I'd like 2, Mrs Keef, 3 or 4, so we'll have to see.


I absolutely adore my daughter, but not sure I'd say I "enjoy" being a parent, as it's a drag, and maybe I'm selfish. I sometimes think there is something wrong with me, as everyone else seems to think it's absolutely the best thing ever.


That said, I guess it'll get more fun as she gets older, and it becomes more fun... Still though, the thought of having 6!!! :-S

Before we had kids I had ambivalent feelings about being a dad, whereas Mrs CitEd had always longed to be a mum. Now we have two boys and will stop there. But as they grow older (youngest is 2 and a half)from time to time I certainly get the feeling that having a third would be nice. It's not so much that three is a better sized family than two it's just that I get a tad envious of those with tiny babies!
Nature is so clever hey...that's my problem too citizenED, I just loooovvvveeee tiny newborn babies. Keep telling myself they don't stay like that for 5 minutes, and focussing on my mostly cross/frustrated 18 month old....but still......sigh......

that's pretty much how me and my husband feel. It just IS a drag - well a lot of the time - not for everyone I know, I mean there are plenty people who do seem to loooove it all but lord it's hard. I spent the first six months basically telling all my childless friends to stay that way! I think that's the thing - there is a big difference between loving your child, and loving being a parent.



Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I absolutely adore my daughter, but not sure I'd

> say I "enjoy" being a parent, as it's a drag, and

> maybe I'm selfish. I sometimes think there is

> something wrong with me, as everyone else seems to

> think it's absolutely the best thing ever.

>

> That said, I guess it'll get more fun as she gets

> older, and it becomes more fun... Still though,

> the thought of having 6!!! :-S

like many people, i think two is ideal. we started too late and had problems though so it's probably just the one for us. It doesn't really bother me though. One is a million times better than none if you are set on having kids and initially can't.


My brother has five and that seems fun but nuts too. (and expensive)


Maybe if I had full time help and cooperative fertility, three or four would be nice.

Mmmmm, age is definitely an issue. There's no way I'd want to do new baby stuff now in my early forties & with other kids to care for. Just too knackered. There's also the 'time for each' issue as they get bigger. Whilst money would help with that I'm sure, without it I just don't think it fair to spread my self any thinner than I do among the four I've got.


Re; the restrictions of parenthood. I felt the same, but I have to say it has got a lot more fun as they've got older, & I'm loving having teenagers, grumpiness, hormones, smelly feet & all (I'm so going to regret saying that aren't I? The gods will come & bite me on the bum now you'll see). They're so funny and witty, and interesting (and beautiful of course ;-)). For me parenthood does seem to get better as the years roll by.

Initially, I always said I wanted three. My son is 15 weeks old now and I think he may be the last one we have :( Not because it's hard, it is but it's easier to deal with now, but because DH *promised* he would cut back on his insane working hours once the bubs came along, but I find myself being alone with the baby for 18 hours a day, seven days a week (Not even joking here, wish I was!!!!). I don't think I could cope with two or three kids under these 'conditions'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...