Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DC ties his own Bow Tie I'm sure...that's a stick

> on

_____________________________________________________________


Yeah but....



He's "ruffing" it here with Billy Piper ( does mrs d_c know..? )


http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00700/dr-who_Billie_WENN__700354a.jpg


W**F

The Doctor's calling card (from Remembrance of the Daleks)

In the first episode, Barbara addresses the Doctor as "Doctor Foreman", as this is the surname the Doctor's granddaughter Susan goes by, and the junkyard in which they find him bears the sign "I.M. Foreman". When addressed by Ian with this name in the next episode, the Doctor responds, "Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about?" Later, when he realises that "Foreman" is not the Doctor's name, Ian asks Barbara, "Who is he? Doctor who?" (In an ultimately-unused idea from documents written at the series' inception, Barbara and Ian would have subsequently referred to the Doctor as 'Dr. Who', given their not knowing his real given name.)


etc etc from Wikpedia.


Not sure if we know his real name, but I just enjoyed Tom Baker on the Ark in space on Watch. Top Quality.

It's interesting reference to the fact that you can't always choose your own name.


The Doctor clearly prefers to be call the Doctor.


However, I have a friend called Adam whose name is actually Donut (apologies for spelling). It's necessary in practical encounters that he responds to Donut, because othwerwise his social life would become dysfunctional.


I'm aware that both he, his wife and his parents prefer Adam. I'm aware that there's an argument that says his parents have first dibs on the naming process, and that there is a technical and legal issue with the moniker 'Adam'.


But he isn't Adam, he's Donut. That's his name.


So too is Doctor Who. The Doctor, not Adam.

The guy in the top picture looks, stands, and dresses like a gimp.




D_C stands tall and straight although his hands, possibly, aren't as clean as old gimpy.



In the bedroom picture she looks as though she's more involved with her shopping list,


than the irritatingly hopeful, adolescent lover.


He hasn't realised that a woman with her back to him, means, she has the hots for the director or the producer.

Well now....


I once sat next to young Matt in a Japanese restaurant in mornington crescent about 12 months ago so I don't feel ashamed in claiming credit as the inspiration for his dress sense. The tweed is a good look although some proper fitting moleskins and sturdy brogues will be more useful in fighting Daleks than his current ensemble.


We do have similarly foppish hair and a penchant for red-heads(shhh).


Ahoy-hoy.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well now....

>

> I once sat next to young Matt in a Japanese

> restaurant in mornington crescent about 12 months

> ago so I don't feel ashamed in claiming credit as

> the inspiration for his dress sense. The tweed is

> a good look although some proper fitting moleskins

> and sturdy brogues will be more useful in fighting

> Daleks than his current ensemble.

>

> We do have similarly foppish hair and a penchant

> for red-heads(shhh).

>

> Ahoy-hoy.


_________________________________________________________


See...


Dapper "david_carnell" The new doctor


...actually likes this thread



So there ok (

)






W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • wanted lego my child is collecting lego if you have any for sale please let me know
    • I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...