Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello East Dulwich Parents - we need your power now!


A group of concerned local parents and teachers have set out to create an event in South London that aims to help further inform people (including ourselves) about the changes and challenges facing our schools.


We have organised a 'Parents Defending Education - South London: Parents & Teachers Event' and I wanted to see if I could encourage you all to come so we can get informed and involved together. Please spread the word to other parents you know too. All are welcome. We want it to be as lively, information rich and well attended as possible.


Thursday 16 June at 8pm at effraspace, 21 Effra Parade, London SW2 1PX


Here is a link to the Facebook event page which it would be wonderful if you could click if you will attend and share:


https://www.facebook.com/events/250401915318081/permalink/250500468641559/


The event has been created as an opportunity for parents to meet with teachers, share information and hear first hand the challenges and concerns facing our education system. In the last few weeks the media has been full of stories about the government's plans for schools but what will this mean for your child and school? Today 8 Lambeth schools received letters in their book bags saying that academisation was now on the cards. Your school may have been one of these or be next?


Hopefully the event will give you the opportunity to:


Discover more about how local schools are run and how this might change in the future? Academisation is still a route many schools may take - forced or not.


Understand what teachers and fellow parents really feel about SATs and the increasingly onerous regime of Primary testing.


Get to grips with how the governments funding freeze will be effect class size, number of teachers and assistants and support services.


Out of the meeting we hope to be able to agree what a campaign directed to government might look like, how to support teachers / schools further and what action we might want to take in our own school - at the very least discuss what questions we should all be asking?


We are very pleased to have received the backing of the NUT for our meeting. The meeting will be free and drinks and nibbles will be on offer.


Good campaigns to check out if you want more information are:


‪#‎letkidsbekids‬ ‪#‎parentsagainstforcedacademies‬ ‪#‎parentsdefendingeducation‬


Let's remember that our schools don't belong to the government. Our schools belong to our children, to the community, to the parents, to the teachers and support staff and to future generations.


Many thanks all.

This all sounds very reasonable - concerned local parents, get informed etc. Isn't it actually just the Anti-Academies Alliance, by another name? Which in turn is a movement dominated by teaching and other public sector unions, with no interest in anything other than knee-jerk opposition to anything that disturbs their vested interests?


If you're appealing for people to join your (political) cause, just say so - don't dress it up as something else (however ineptly)

  • 4 weeks later...
Just to clairfy I can tell you now this meeting has been organised by a collection of local parents across a range of primary schools including very concerned parents with children in the 8 Gipsy Hill Federation primaries who are under threat of academisation. We want to defend education as a public service and open up a discussion about the fundamental changes that our government are proposing. Do feel free to come as we want a full exploration of all views.

"Do feel free to come as we want a full exploration of all views."


But do you, really?


"Parents Defending Education" - from whom? Or is that something still to be decided?


"Out of the meeting we hope to be able to agree what a campaign directed to government might look like" - but there's definitely going to be campaign directed at government, right?


"We are very pleased to have received the backing of the NUT for our meeting" - have you checked with them whether they are interested in a 'full exploration of all views'? My view is that the NUT represent a significant threat to further improvement in schools - can we explore that?


"Let's remember that our schools don't belong to the government. Our schools belong to our children, to the community, to the parents, to the teachers and support staff and to future generations." My view is that this is meaningless, pointless nonsense - the real question is who should run schools, and in particular how to manage the tricky balance of power between govt (central and local), the management and governors of individual schools (and increasingly those of academy chains), and others, in particular whoever is carrying out the supervisory/quality control function, be it Ofsted or whoever. My sense is that this (serious and difficult) issue is one you're not interested in grappling with.


'Parents Defending Education' = simplistic nonsense.

I agree with DaveR on this point..

'Isn't it actually just the Anti-Academies Alliance, by another name? Which in turn is a movement dominated by teaching and other public sector unions,...'

And the fact that the NUT is backing your meeting kind of proves the hidden agenda.

Anyone who is 'in' education knows that local councils use schools (and other front-line public services controlled by the local council) as political footballs and will use every opportunity to manipulate local 'democratic' powers to denigrate the government's policies, when central government is conservative and local government is not as we all saw during the Thatcher years.

During the 1990s I worked in several different types of schools in Southwark, Lambeth and Lewisham- all of them seemed to have enough resources at the 'chalkface' - City Technology Colleges, Grant Maintained and Voluntary Aided faith schools but the locally managed schools- i.e. the ones in local Authority control- did not

The frightening thing is that now and in the immediate future, funding for the education of our children in all schools and colleges is being cut - whether they are local authority maintained schools, sixth form colleges, academies. This is my concern as a parent of children just starting their education.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...