Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is long one....if you dont have a few mins...move to the next thread...


I realise I should have expected it from logging on to the Gruaniad website, but the following article has me seething...


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/26/women-misogynist-trolls-feminist-internet



A short rant required...


1. So now we have research which shows the the majority of 'misogynist' abuse towards women on the internet comes from young women, not from men. According to the article "now we know many trolls are young women, the searchlight shines on schools? failure to look after children?s well-being". Because, previously, when we thought it was mostly men throwing the abuse, we just thought the men need to learn to control themselves. Now we have to find someone other than the abusers to blame...

2. When referring to male online abusers, the author repeatedly refers to them as 'Sad, Angry Men'; but the implication is that the young women committing the abuse are lovely middle-class princesses; corrupted by the evil patriarchal world

3. The study reveals 10,000 messages in the UK with these abusive terms, so of the ~12m or so internet users and millions of twitter messages, its a drop in the ocean. But of course the PC brigade cant stand by without a parliamentary campaign. We all know there arent any other issues that our politicians could be focusing on.


Don't get me wrong, I'm against any form of abuse, online or otherwise, it just winds me up when a national publication publishes this tripe in the name of 'social justice'....


Rant over. Sorry you had to bother reading if you even got this far.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/108124-feminist-internet/
Share on other sites

If you want to see hoards of the generally female, mostly white, reasonably educated but not the sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian readers too.

root Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you want to see hoards of the generally female,

> mostly white, reasonably educated but not the

> sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look

> at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the

> David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc

> crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian

> readers too.


Just scroll through the EDF for that I'd say!

Or is this a mysogynistic post in itself? Discuss

binkylilyput Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> root Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If you want to see hoards of the generally female,

> > mostly white, reasonably educated but not the

> > sharpest tools in the box rabid trolls have a look

> > at the Food Babe Army along with the rest of the

> > David Wolfe groupies, antivaxxers, homeopathy, etc

> > crowds. Quite a lot of them would be Guardian readers too.

>

> Just scroll through the EDF for that I'd say!

> Or is this a mysogynistic post in itself? Discuss


Simple answer: No.


More complex answer: No.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...