Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yet another example of the Kafkaesque immigration system in this country. Sadly not the first time we have seen such a sickening decision. I hope the Minister comes to his senses in time to save Isaac's life.


Dulwich College are sponsoring Isaac's brother to come to the UK and paying for his flight once a visa is granted. They have been doing a great deal to support their employee at this vital time.


There was a very good segment on London Tonight (ITV) last night, followed by a piece about a charity set up to raise awareness of blood, organ, bone marrow and other forms of medical donation within the Black African, Black Caribbean or mixed race communities.

The British High Commission refused a visa on the basis that his brother is a rickshaw driver and, in their opinion, could not be relied upon to go home again after the treatment was completed. He has a family in Nigeria. This is a common response by the decision-makers and could be said to be a often-used key on their keyboard.

Officials are required to stick to rules set out for them (and often at least endorsed, if not debated and voted on, by Parliament) - it is senior politicians (government ministers) who can overturn these rules in specific cases - and most frequently do so. I would be very worried if individual officials were allowed to interpret rules willy-nilly. That is how corruption can readily enter the system. Although we can all see the reason why leave to enter should be granted in this case, for a specific and compassionate reasons I for one would be very worried if such decisions were in future to be devolved to officials. This is not, I believe Kafka-esqe (the reasons for the initial decision are clear and follow well published guidelines) but rather a good example of why laws designed for generalities will always have possible exceptions.


It should be remembered that there are many occasions when immigration law has been subverted (for instance marriages to confer citizenship which are legal but bogus). How quickly might convincing 'documents' be made available to would-be immigrants if such mercy dashes were put at the discretion of hard-pressed officials.


This one is clearly kosher - the next ones might not be, if such a loophole was put through the formal regulations regarding the granting of visas.

Penguin68, I have worked within the immigration and asylum system for all of my career. My experience of the decision-making process has been that is has been very Kafkaesque. Unfortunately, I am currently not in practice otherwise I would have offered to help Dulwich College pro bono. I have however given them contact details for people who may be able to help.


As for the argument that the hands of the decision-makers are tied by strict rules and laws, there is a long-standing and lawful ability for the decision-maker to exercise his/her discretion outside the Immigration Rules in certain circumstances. There are also policies outside the Rules which have not been made law, although many are transferred into law in time. Bogus marriages are not an example of bad decision-making or corruption, they are unlawful and carried out usually by criminal gangs.

Excellent news charlottep!


And for those who are minded to take direct action, here are the contact details for the James Brokenshire, the Immigration Minister's office [taken from his website]:


Immigration enquiries

020 7035 4848

Home Office, 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF

[email protected]

I think what IlonaM says makes sense, there needs to be some level of autonomy at a lower level to make decisions in extreme scenarios.


I'm not inclined to believe that the brother of a (presumably) honest, hard working and very sick man would be looking to take advantage of the situation.


But I am also wondering, as James pointed out, is it not possible for the bone marrow to be sent over - if the immigration dept are really so inflexible?

Jeremy Wrote:


> But I am also wondering, as James pointed out, is

> it not possible for the bone marrow to be sent

> over - if the immigration dept are really so

> inflexible?


From what I can discover online, Nigeria is building a bone marrow donation centre but it's not finished yet, so donors currently have to go to South Africa, which presumably would have the same cost and visa implications.


Hopefully this will be sorted quickly; to those above saying rules is rules, well not really - each case, as the Home Office says, is considered on its individual merits, there's no hard and fast you need X amount of money etc. It appears in this case that the British High Commission official was suspicious of the disparity between Patrick's monthly earnings of ?68 and his having ?1500 to make the trip (and rightly so, there's a recognised racket of gangs providing the travel money upfront then making the recipient work illegally for them in the UK to pay off the debt and (ever ballooning) interest). Hopefully once Patrick provides the evidence of where his airfare is coming from the decision can be changed.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hopefully once Patrick provides the evidence of where his airfare

> is coming from the decision can be changed.


If Dulwich College are offering the money, you'd think it would be a closed case...

Jeremy Wrote:


> If Dulwich College are offering the money, you'd

> think it would be a closed case...


Yes that's what I thought, it sounds as though either the documentation provided to the BHC in Nigeria omitted to mention it or someone didn't read it very thoroughly, hopefully with the publicity the decision can be looked at again and quickly reversed.

Agreed Pennydreadful.


I can see P68's point about decision makers and agree that it would be a worry if any low pay grade officer had discretion. But it shouldn't need to go to ministerial level, there should be a transparent panel at managerial level within the immigration service.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...