Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So you sent them a letter with some serious

> allegations, the councillor replied to you saying

> because of the seriousness of the allegations

> they've passed it on to the Strategic Director of

> Communities, Law and Governance.

>

> You then continue to send letters to the

> councillor about this issue even though you were

> told it had been passed on. Why not ask the

> Strategic Director for the details you require?



Thank you for your reply,

I requested that Mr McNally clarify the ambiguity in his letter,

1) What was the date on the letter that had been handed to him by the leader.

2) Whom handed him the letter. Shepperd or Stanton


Very simple and reasonable requests, given the amount of data being produced, a reference point would help me manage information.


As you can see I afforded Mr McNally the courtesy of referencing his letter by both date and ref: #

Not only did Mr. McNally chose not to reciprocate he chose not to respond.

This lack of professional courtesy is indefensible.


KD

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why not ask the Strategic Director for the details

> you require?



Because the Strategic Director did not send me the letter of the 1st February 2010 Mr. McNally did.


Question: why would one ask someone that did not send a letter, about a letter sent by someone completely different?.

You have, from what I can see, made a serious allegation. The counsellors have passed it to their legal department. At that point, if I was the councillor, I'd stay out of the loop as well. Legal matters are best dealt with by the experts and councillors are, generally, not experts.


You've been given the Strategic Director's name it has been passed to - that is the person to talk to. Councillors are there to run the council's day to day stuff. You have a specific complaint that has been passed to what sounds like the right person. Contacting them is the correct thing to do - writing childish websites won't get you anywhere (and from the various responses here, seems to have failed spectacularly).


Also, you are being more than a little disingenuous - your website is entitled "Reason not to vote Liberal Democrat" and way down the bottom you try to wriggle out of this, saying "I am not telling anyone how they should vote." What exactly are you trying to achieve here?

My opinion is that the Lib-Dem?s are not fit to govern. This opinion is based on factual evidence provided. Given no one thus far has provided me with any factual evidence to contradict my opinion. I have made my case.


Logic dictates,

If the Lib-Dem?s cannot function professionally locally, why would anyone trust them to work any better nationally?


I am not telling anyone how they should vote, that?s between them and the ballot-box.


Liberal Democrats are not fit for governance of this country in my opinion.


KD

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> Also, you are being more than a little

> disingenuous - your website is entitled "Reason

> not to vote Liberal Democrat" and way down the

> bottom you try to wriggle out of this, saying "I

> am not telling anyone how they should vote." What

> exactly are you trying to achieve here?



I am sorry that you have misunderstood the web-site.

I have given reasons not to vote Lib-Dem. Such as, Lib-Dem councillors deleting emails without reading then first and Lib-Dem councillor not responding to letters and email plus more.

If you would like to tell me where I have told people how to vote I would be happy to correct this.


I do not understand your comment ?wriggle out of this? if you feel I have been duplicitous in some way, you are wrong, I leave that kind of behavior to Southwark Council.


KD

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KD

>

>

> Try this for a bit of light relief...

>

>

> http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517eb1ewwIL.

> _BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRig

> ht,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

>

> Please & save us all

>

>

>

> W**F



OK, Who let the playground bully?s out?


KD

KD - I'm familiar with the type of behaviour you have described.


I know of cases where Tessa Jowell, her conservative predecessor Gerald Bowden and Harriet Harman have blanked constituents who raised allegations against medical practitioners, lawyers and police officers.


I think most politicians and social elites know whose back to scratch and what to leave well alone.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KD Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > OK, Who let the playground bully?s out?

> >

> > KD

>

> _______________________________________

>

> Probably...

>

> The LibDems...

>

>

> W:)-DF



Many a true word spoken in jest.


KD

I have given reasons not to vote Lib-Dem. Such as, Lib-Dem councillors deleting emails without reading then first and Lib-Dem councillor not responding to letters and email plus more.


If you would like to tell me where I have told people how to vote I would be happy to correct this.



Do you even read you own contradictory utterings before you press 'post'? Personally, if the councillors have filed your correspondence under 'nutter', I wouldn't fault them.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have given reasons not to vote Lib-Dem. Such as,

> Lib-Dem councillors deleting emails without

> reading then first and Lib-Dem councillor not

> responding to letters and email plus more.

>

> If you would like to tell me where I have told

> people how to vote I would be happy to correct

> this.

>

> Do you even read you own contradictory utterings

> before you press 'post'? Personally, if the

> councillors have filed your correspondence under

> 'nutter', I wouldn't fault them.



I see you have descended to the gutter of name calling, forgive me if I do not join you there.


KD

For clarity,

I have given reasons not to vote Lib-Dem.

There maybe many on this forum that can give good reason to vote for Lib-Dem.


Unfortunately some people on this forum are confusing the word reason and telling.


Reason is a human mental faculty that allows an individual to formulate premises that could lead to conclusions.


KD

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At least I didn't go to the bizarre bother of

> buying a domain name, getting a web host and

> writing a web page, all because someone failed to

> reply to my email.

>

> And you are trying to claim the moral high ground

> here?



Sorry, when can we expect to see you on Jerry Springer show next?


KD

Hmmm. The Kevin Springer Show. Sounds plausible.


(Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)


Kevin Springer: Today we meet a man who is upset his email wasn't replied to. Let's meet Kevin! Kevin, you were ignored by a Southwark councillor...


KD: Yes, this man sent me a letter and when I asked him a question, he... he... he didn't reply. (Kevin breaks down uncontrollably. A box of tissues is fetched from the side of the studio.)


(Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)


KD: I mean, if this doesn't show the man isn't fit for office, what would? How anyone could vote for a man who... who... (sobs again) ignores emails. He's just a complete... rotter.


Kevin Springer: Have you tried setting up a website on the subject?


KD: Of course! I mean, in this situation, what else could I do? It was the only sane course of action.


(Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)


[the rest can be seen on ITV2 sometime in the small hours of the morning]

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm. The Kevin Springer Show. Sounds plausible.

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> Kevin Springer: Today we meet a man who is upset

> his email wasn't replied to. Let's meet Kevin!

> Kevin, you were ignored by a Southwark

> councillor...

>

> KD: Yes, this man sent me a letter and when I

> asked him a question, he... he... he didn't reply.

> (Kevin breaks down uncontrollably. A box of

> tissues is fetched from the side of the studio.)

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> KD: I mean, if this doesn't show the man isn't fit

> for office, what would? How anyone could vote for

> a man who... who... (sobs again) ignores emails.

> He's just a complete... rotter.

>

> Kevin Springer: Have you tried setting up a

> website on the subject?

>

> KD: Of course! I mean, in this situation, what

> else could I do? It was the only sane course of

> action.

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

>



Yes, the trailer park want to know where to forward your mail.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm. The Kevin Springer Show. Sounds plausible.

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> Kevin Springer: Today we meet a man who is upset

> his email wasn't replied to. Let's meet Kevin!

> Kevin, you were ignored by a Southwark

> councillor...

>

> KD: Yes, this man sent me a letter and when I

> asked him a question, he... he... he didn't reply.

> (Kevin breaks down uncontrollably. A box of

> tissues is fetched from the side of the studio.)

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> KD: I mean, if this doesn't show the man isn't fit

> for office, what would? How anyone could vote for

> a man who... who... (sobs again) ignores emails.

> He's just a complete... rotter.

>

> Kevin Springer: Have you tried setting up a

> website on the subject?

>

> KD: Of course! I mean, in this situation, what

> else could I do? It was the only sane course of

> action.

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

>

----------------------------------------------------------


OMG- that was hilarious!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm. The Kevin Springer Show. Sounds plausible.

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> Kevin Springer: Today we meet a man who is upset

> his email wasn't replied to. Let's meet Kevin!

> Kevin, you were ignored by a Southwark

> councillor...

>

> KD: Yes, this man sent me a letter and when I

> asked him a question, he... he... he didn't reply.

> (Kevin breaks down uncontrollably. A box of

> tissues is fetched from the side of the studio.)

>

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

> KD: I mean, if this doesn't show the man isn't fit

> for office, what would? How anyone could vote for

> a man who... who... (sobs again) ignores emails.

> He's just a complete... rotter.

>

> Kevin Springer: Have you tried setting up a

> website on the subject?

>

> KD: Of course! I mean, in this situation, what

> else could I do? It was the only sane course of

> action.

>

> (Crowd: KEV-IN, KEV-IN)

>

>


========================================


You are so sad,

You cannot come up with your own original punch line, so you steel my punch line and feebly try and make it your own.

Not only plagiaries but sad plagiaries at that.

You really must be the life and sole of the party (NOT)


I was sorry to hear that the doctors could not reverse your lobotomy


KD

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At least I didn't go to the bizarre bother of

> buying a domain name, getting a web host and

> writing a web page, all because someone failed to

> reply to my email.

>

> And you are trying to claim the moral high ground

> here?



=================================


Do you know how long it takes me to put up a web-site?. Answer: 20 minutes

Do you know how long it would take you to put up a web-site?. Answer: how long before hell freezes over


KD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...