Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't see it opening in July.


When the kids from Heber interviewed the builders in December 2015, they were told the build was expected to take 44 weeks and should be finished in July 2016. Andrew Wicks of Southwark planning was also interviewed and said that with store fitting, they were expecting the new store to open before Christmas 2016.


M&S still aren't recruiting, though Dulwich is now listed on the M&S website as a new store opening.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1012718
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Anyone else notice that stores are now just

> > calling their store locations Dulwich rather

> than

> > East Dulwich?

>

> East Dulwich is the new Dulwich.



Mick.. I've said this before. but when I moved here in 1980 from Peckham people would ask where have you moved to.


I would say Dulwich and they would reply.. No. You live in EAST Dulwich NOT Dulwich..


Now.. People say.. Do you live in EAST Dulwich ?


I just say.. I live in EAST Dulwich.. BUT I was Born in PECKHAM..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015509
Share on other sites

When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now, it's all cool.


I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the popular part.


Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015525
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell

> me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now,

> it's all cool.

>

> I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor

> relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear

> Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the

> popular part.

>

> Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the

> two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a

> Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL

> is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.



Apart from Dulwich Tandoori.... Dulwich D.I.Y.... Dulwich Books.... Dulwich Trader (Department Store).... Dulwich Vinters..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015570
Share on other sites

I think you are right-- they are marketing to the wider area and loads of Dulwich Village people hang out on LL. There isn;t the same price difference there used to be between the areas either when looking at equal sized properties so its much of a muchness now I suppose.



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell

> me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now,

> it's all cool.

>

> I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor

> relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear

> Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the

> popular part.

>

> Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the

> two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a

> Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL

> is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015592
Share on other sites

I've always thought that Dulwich was the whole area protected by the Dulwich College Estate rules and regulations as regards buildings and development. Unfortunately, East Dulwich is not protected by any such rules so there are carbuncles (you may call them extensions...) appearing all over the Victorian houses.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015966
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...