Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't see it opening in July.


When the kids from Heber interviewed the builders in December 2015, they were told the build was expected to take 44 weeks and should be finished in July 2016. Andrew Wicks of Southwark planning was also interviewed and said that with store fitting, they were expecting the new store to open before Christmas 2016.


M&S still aren't recruiting, though Dulwich is now listed on the M&S website as a new store opening.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1012718
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Anyone else notice that stores are now just

> > calling their store locations Dulwich rather

> than

> > East Dulwich?

>

> East Dulwich is the new Dulwich.



Mick.. I've said this before. but when I moved here in 1980 from Peckham people would ask where have you moved to.


I would say Dulwich and they would reply.. No. You live in EAST Dulwich NOT Dulwich..


Now.. People say.. Do you live in EAST Dulwich ?


I just say.. I live in EAST Dulwich.. BUT I was Born in PECKHAM..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015509
Share on other sites

When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now, it's all cool.


I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the popular part.


Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015525
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell

> me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now,

> it's all cool.

>

> I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor

> relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear

> Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the

> popular part.

>

> Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the

> two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a

> Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL

> is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.



Apart from Dulwich Tandoori.... Dulwich D.I.Y.... Dulwich Books.... Dulwich Trader (Department Store).... Dulwich Vinters..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015570
Share on other sites

I think you are right-- they are marketing to the wider area and loads of Dulwich Village people hang out on LL. There isn;t the same price difference there used to be between the areas either when looking at equal sized properties so its much of a muchness now I suppose.



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I moved to East Dulwich people tried to tell

> me I had moved to Peckham. No shame in that now,

> it's all cool.

>

> I think East Dulwich is no longer the poor

> relation of Dulwich, such that when people hear

> Dulwich, they maybe think of East Dulwich.... the

> popular part.

>

> Or perhaps the stores are effectively merging the

> two areas into one. Let's face it no one has a

> Dulwich store anyway, there is no street... so LL

> is I guess Dulwich's main shopping area.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015592
Share on other sites

I've always thought that Dulwich was the whole area protected by the Dulwich College Estate rules and regulations as regards buildings and development. Unfortunately, East Dulwich is not protected by any such rules so there are carbuncles (you may call them extensions...) appearing all over the Victorian houses.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/111602-m-s/#findComment-1015966
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I really don’t want to be a complainer, but mail is definitely no longer arriving in SE22.
    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...