Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BBCiplayer for me - unshaven you say..?


_______________________________________


Maybe..?


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Q8aWGY6RqPY/SjaRTvsXBtI/AAAAAAAAFWw/g1h71lGp2Wk/s400/schick-quattro-trimstyle2.jpg


Maybe not....



W**F

Really?. I've seen him on a couple of other interviews and he seemed a pretty decent chap. Maybe like some actors he has a chameleon like ability to adapt to his surroundings, and well, being on the Jonathan Ross show....


I thought last night's drama was quite enjoyable. It was total bunkum, it was predictable and utterly clich? ridden (I thought they could have called it Lutherl Weapon 6) but it was well executed, great cast and will probably grow into itself a little.

I mean come on, it's from the writers of spooks so it was never going to be gritty and plausible was it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> His real name is Idris.....

>

>

> wot were his parents thinking.


____________________________________


Well....



Soz to "dis" an all that


But I heard him in another interview & his real name isn't really "Idris"


And yes he was acting a bit of a cock on JR ( which in it's self is a "cock" show )



But as mrs woof said..


"It's not the acting bit I'm interested in......"



Soooo, make of that what you will ( dirty cow )



W**F

I loved Spooks because the lead was a woman, a blond attractive woman at that, played by an actress who could act, and I'm thick enough never to see plots even though I am a writer.


Luther was so way over sold which put me off and I also did not like Idris on J Ross, for various reasons, but I shall watch it on the playback thing on me BT Vision but only because of the above references!


(When I am not watching each and every episode from my Persuaders DVD!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...