Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As if we haven't seen/heard enough from all the back-stabbing, two-faced, back-tracking national politicians, now the local slime bags are getting in on the act.


The chairman of the Local Government Association, Lord Porter, has said " The government was extremely foolish to ask the UK electorate the EU question when it didn't know what the answer would be".


You really just could not make it up for a satirical sketch show, could you!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/112919-and-now-at-local-level/
Share on other sites

Foolish to divide the country. Foolish to throw it into economic turmoil. Foolish to leave it at the mercy of leading politicians who, whilst campaigning to leave the EU, had not the slightest real wish to win the referendum and - once they'd done so - had no alternative plan to put in place.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?



It was done - and the result happened


But things are better decided by a manifesto commitment

and voting at a general election IMHO


Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> adonirum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jenny1 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > But wouldn't you agree that that was

> extremely

> > > foolish?

> >

> > What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?

>

>

> It was done - and the result happened

>

> But things are better decided by a manifesto

> commitment

> and voting at a general election IMHO

>

Imagine if we all voted online for every issue ;)


The EU referendum was NOT voted on line. We had Polling Cards and voted at Local Polling Stations.

Unless I've missed something. ?


DulwichFox

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What do you mean by "slime bags" and who are the

> local ones? Why do you call Porter one?



I have used slime bags as a generic description of all politicians at all levels, and, by local ones, again I was referring to local councillors as a whole, and not necessarily specific to ED.


I can see where the confusion may have arisen by using definite article "the", and perhaps I could have made that easier to interpret by just stating "now local slime bags" to show the generalisation.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenny1 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But wouldn't you agree that that was extremely

> > foolish?

>

> What, foolish to have a democratic vote ?


Cameron gave no thought to a Leave vote - just assumed a remain.


Then even worse no long term debate - did we ever discuss what sort of UK we want

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL didn't say the referendum was done via

> online voting.

> He was supposing the situation if on-line format

> was used for referenda on all issues.

> Unless I missed something.


That's what I meant - assuming no abuse - everyone a single vote and

we vote for issues and then the government implements them.


Would probably be awful :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I spoke to a sound engineer at Piermont and he mentioned the software they use which tries to absorb the sound into the landscape
    • I think we're probably closest - about 50m from one of the tents - and to be honest it's not that bad. The bass is making the windows vibrate but it's not 'noisy' I've always said the loud music is the least of the issues to me. It's the construction for two weeks before / one week after, the imposing steel wall, the trodden in non-decomposing litter (fag butts, cable ties, vapes, bottle tops, ring pulls) which will cover the entire site forever, the compaction & damage to the grass which takes months to recover, the impact on birds, bats & wildlife of 24/7 lights, the anti social behaviour of so many attendees (p***ing on the streets and in the bushes) and this year the blatant extending of the site footprint, despite previously giving the reason they can't move it is because it's been designed for that location. And hopefully everyone can see this for what it really is - an attempt to win over the local community and set a precedent for four festival days, so that they have a stronger argument when they put in an application for six days again next year.  Southwark state that the money from Gala goes directly to supporting their Events dept, who support "up to 100 free events every year". So what are these free events, and why do we need another? 
    • Found now. All safe.   Found now!
    • We are on Friern Road and can not  hear Gala tonight, each year it depends on direction of wind, but we can hear Kneecap who are playing in Brockwell tonight....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...