Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Can anyone help? I understand that when my son reaches 2 and a half he will be entitled to around 12hours of nursery care a week...is that right? Is it only specific nurseries that you can go to for this? Do you have to put your name down on waiting lists etc?


Hope someone can enlighten me!?


Thanks

Helen

Hi,

I think the free allocation is applied the term after the child turns 3 rather than at 2 1/2. I may be wrong, perhaps other forumites could confirm? The free entitlement applies to all nurseries which are ofsted registered I think - again, happy for confirmation from others....

Yes term after 3 (exact dates can be given by nurseries) and 5 sessions of 2 1/2 hours. You don't have to put your name down to get the funding - I think the nursery does this, but you would obviously need to find a nursery. I think they all accept it and do the admin for you.

The only catch/thing to know, is that usually nurseries do sessions of at least 3 hours, so you do pay for the remaining half hour - you can't just group your hours as you wish. And the funding only applies to school term time, whereas many nurseries go through the holidays, so you are then expected to pay full price for the holidays. Worth knowing, so you don't get caught out. Obviously the increase in fees is dramatic.

  • 3 weeks later...
Our daughter goes to a phantatstic Montessori pre-school and they have now opted out of the grant. All us parents had meetings with the provider. She explained that the grant doesn't cover their costs and so they make a loss I think about ?2 per hour per child. That's why they decided to opt out and go private and we all decided to stay. I know from friends two nurseries which closed because of the grant. They told us about this website: http://www.saveournurseries.org/
parkview, any reason why they didn't keep claiming the grant? Our son's nursery (also montessori) claims the grant so fees are slightly lower for children who qualify. But because they only accept full time places, and because the grant doesn't cover the full costs, you still have to pay fees.
That's what they did the last years, deducting the costs so it was cheaper once the child turned three. What they say is that the law now requires them to offer 12.5 hours for free if someone wants it like this, so they can't ask them to do more hours and pay the difference. The provider has been campaigning about this for a while and says most nursery providers are not aware that they are breaking the law if they don't offer completely free places. So if you go to your nursery and say that you only want to do 12.5 hours (or 15 hours soon) per week and the nursery says they don't offer that, they are breaking the law and you can tell the council and they loose the right to receive grants.

tallgirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> St Mary's Rd Pre School (St Mary's Rd) in Nunhead

> is open for 15 hours a week, from aged 2.5 you pay

> 6 pounds a day, but for 3 year olds the fees are 3

> pounds per day (a pound an hour!)



I didn't think that was legal.. topup fees can't be charged for a child who is 3+

parkview Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's what they did the last years, deducting the

> costs so it was cheaper once the child turned

> three. What they say is that the law now requires

> them to offer 12.5 hours for free if someone wants

> it like this, so they can't ask them to do more

> hours and pay the difference. The provider has

> been campaigning about this for a while and says

> most nursery providers are not aware that they are

> breaking the law if they don't offer completely

> free places. So if you go to your nursery and say

> that you only want to do 12.5 hours (or 15 hours

> soon) per week and the nursery says they don't

> offer that, they are breaking the law and you can

> tell the council and they loose the right to

> receive grants.


Indeed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...