Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Happy to have a look at her contract - it will be pretty specific about the contractual arrangements around sick pay. In my experience it is unusual for nannies to be paid anything other than SSP, especially so soon after starting (often families as a gesture of goodwill will pay when they don't have to once the nanny has proven their reliability, but the contract itself is less than generous).


It may be that your nanny is just making use of what she sees as a 'benefit', and if that benefit can be legitimately removed, her sick record would dramatically improve! If you are otherwise happy with her and the children like her, perhaps it's worth looking into.

In our very standard nanny contract, we must pay 3 days sick pay (which is "statutory"). Your contract sounds nuts. Some nanny contracts only have one day paid sick pay, as far as I have heard. Our nanny has never been ill more than 3 consecutive days, but if she had a doctor?s notice I would pay more days accordingly.

We also have a clause saying that disciplinary measures can be taken for causing disruption to the household and unreliability in attendance and time keeping, which I think your nanny is doing (texting in the same day, excessive sick days and no doctor?s notice and you don?t even seem to be informed of what her illnesses are). It would be very unfair to dismiss someone by lying about your circumstances and without an honest confrontation and giving them a second chance. Maybe she can explain her health problems (she will need a doctor?s notice to do this though). If you lose your job due to the effect her absence has on your work, she will obviously loose her job too, so there are serious consequences for her here. I hope she is just going through a spell of bad health, which can sometimes happen if you are really run down (and nannying is an exhauting job where you are exposed to lots of bugs and vulnerable to illness), but only a doctor should be able to check if it is serious enough to skip work so much. Hopefully you can keep her and it was just a bad start.

Pathetic and gives other more principled nannies a bad name.

If she is like this at the start when she is presumably trying to impress the new employer, what on earth will she be like later on?


Oh and I'm afraid I don't buy the real illness thing. Conscientious people who were unlucky with their health in a new job would be falling over themselves to explain it/work instead/not take pay etc.


Fire her soonest.

  • 5 years later...
sack her and don't look back 4 weeks notice and be done with it take it from someone with experience she will just carry on taking the biscuit, i did the whole "sit down and talk" it doesn't make a difference. if you really want a turn around re-write the contract and remove the sick pay going forward and then see what happens however mine had no sick pay and still had 9 days off in 3 n hlf months. not worth it get rid!

id recommend you ring acas and get advice. look at number of absences over number of days, and is there a pattern, eg always on a monday etc.


if she is a good nanny, then it might be an recurring problem which is close to being sorted.


also, think about how you would expect to be treated by your employer if you were unwell, and behave accordingly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...