Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if this is true or not but a German

> friend told me that when the US were forming their

> first constitution there was a vote to see what

> language the 'United' states would speak and that

> German only lost by a couple of votes. How

> different would the history of the last century in

> particular be if the US had been a Germanic

> orientated country and entered the two WW on the

> other side.


Urban legend - sorry!

No I don't think english, should be the only language, as other languages brings culture and difference that is what this country is made up of myself comes from a Jamaican mother who speaks english and spanish father who is Canadian and speak french, I had a great childhood with this added differences :)

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No I don't think english, should be the only

> language, as other languages brings culture and

> difference that is what this country is made up of

> myself comes from a Jamaican mother who speaks

> english and spanish father who is Canadian and

> speak french, I had a great childhood with this

> added differences :)



I absolutely agree with you, different languages make the world interesting and open different point of views. The english language is not very 'specific' comparing to other languages and you might be able to discuss a certain topic in an other language much better. My question would be: Why is there not more focus on foreign languages in english schools? I would suggest to start at nursery.

With the internet and global media (of which the US is the biggest producer) I can't see how the march of English can be stopped. It is already the second language of half the world and with that there's little incentive for native English speakers to need to learn another language.
  • 10 months later...

English is also very popular because it is very at ease with assimilating new words.


Also, the English language has the most extensive vocabulary. This means precise concepts can be expressed succinctly.


All technical terms are already in English, which The Chinese, Indians,and Brazilians have learn already...I do wonder sometimes if all the Mandarin learning Dulwich kids are not wasting their time.

Will the rise of China mean English people will start learning Chinese as a second language in order to expand our chances of securing business deals?


I'm sorry to see so many americanisms creeping into English telly such as 'gotten', bother anyone else?

Actually gotten is English, it's just we more or less ditched it a couple of centuries ago but it lives on in the colonies.


I have got new boots.

I have gotten new boots.


There is no ambiguity in the meaning of the latter, whereas the former can mean either I have taken new boots into my possession or I have them now. Not so terrible is it?

Someone mentioned Welsh will disappear.

Actually, what I find remarkable is that it has survived so long and so (relatively) well despite being so close to England itself, and despite the English education system doing its best to wipe it out in the 19thC/early 20thC.

There are hundreds of thousands of Welsh speakers, but only a few thousand Scots and Irish Gaelic speakers.

I wonder why?

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...