Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Old thread but interesting for current views. I don't differentiate between day/night pay.


I'd pay closer to ?8/hr and also provide dinner, eg pizza. For teens, I think it's fair to pay for their transport home at night. You want to make sure they got home safely at night in a reputable taxi.


We usually have adult babysitters and expect them to make their own way home, unless some unusual circumstances.


Also, it's nice if the babysitter is first-aid trained. In which case ?5/hr is way too low, IMHO. I was first-aid trained as a teen when I did babysitting. It's just a useful skill to have in general, and a good way for teens to build confidence.

Ultimately they may have to do nothing - but you don't know that for sure. The child could wake up or get ill, or (less likely I know) there could be a fire for example. I see it as paying for the responsibility rather than the task as such. I think I've always paid ?7 p/h and have no problem with that, not least because I have two kids (but have paid ?7 when I just had the one too). I'd usually round it up rather than down.

I used to babysit as a teen and got about ?10 an evening and that was about 25 years ago!

I gave it up after one night when the little girl woke up crying wiht a tummy ache so bad that i had to call her parents home (wouldn't you want to be called!)

they told me to keep the cat in so I did and it pooed i the kitchen - my first experience of cat poo and I couldn't believe the smell so i just shut the kitchen door and pretended i had no idea

when they got home they were pissed off to be called home as they said daughter was making it up and couldn't believe the cat poo hadn't been cleaned up

that was me done .

-

I would pay someone properly just so they take it seriously in any case - if you get proper pay then you feel like you are doing a proper job surely?


love this thread


susypx

I think it depends a lot on how old the kids are and how far you are going and for how long. If I was just going out for a quick drink at the end of the road and could be home in 5 minutes, I'd be happy using a teenager on a casual basis - and hope to be doing more of this as the kids get older! but whilst they are still small if I ever (unlikely - sigh!) get to go out a bit further afield I would use someone with experience. There are childminders who babysit for ?8 an hour. I remember babysitting as a teenager and just not having a clue what to do if the little one woke up crying - as they sometimes did. I think it's unfair to put someone in that situation.

I think ?5 is a bit low for babysitting. We pay teenagers $6 an hour in the evening and ?8 after school. Sometimes my husband does walk them home (if local) because we (and their parents) are uncomfortable with putting them in a minicab alone at night. I would never use a 'young' teen for a late night or one that is a bit further afield.


I'm always surprised that people are willing to underpay someone who is tasked with looking after their children. We have had many different babysitters over the years and the ones that i really like, I definitely pay more to hold on to. We have been very fortunate that we have had lovely and, crucially, reliable babysitters over the years. I would suggest that your daughter turn down future jobs as there is plenty of demand out there for good babysitters!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...