Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And Liverpool were 5th to Chelsea's 1st a couple

> of years ago, and look what happened then ;-)


And pool fans wonder why people like to see them get beat.


Once again, the Arse turn over the Spuds ( a top 4 side......well they think, they are) Never mind, there's always next season, or the season after, or the season after that, or...............................

very good PeckhamGateCrasher - I like that...


on a more serious note, I'm glad we got the 3 points yesterday but we were poor and a supposedly weakened Spurs team defended much much better than they have so far this season... in short, we were lucky. And that's ok, teams vying for the title need luck sometimes

I heard the dicussions on Sky yesterday and apparently it wasn't just a guess - the Arsenal team had discussed Keane's penalty taking before the game and knew that Keane likes keepers to commit before kicking the ball - that's why Almunia stayed up for so long and chose correctly


That said the penalty wasn't up to his usual standard and could easily have gone past Almunia had it been better

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree, most goal keepers will tell you they

> choose where to dive, and hope for the best, it's

> as simple as that.

>

> "Spurs were the sharper ones and the better team

> in the first half".

> Wenger


Not the same as saying we were second best for 90 minutes is it? And we're still top of the league. Something Spuds will not experience for many moons. Two class goals from a class team. >:D<

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree, most goal keepers will tell you they

> choose where to dive, and hope for the best, it's

> as simple as that.

>

Equally most penalty takers will tell they will pick a spot and go for it. You seem to be implying that a goal keepers skill is in some way inferior to that of a penalty taker. As someone who still plays( or tries to at 50 years of age), and has a son who can play as an outfield player or in goal, I can assure you that it is not. As a penalty taker you have to outwit the keeper by scoring. Keane failed to to do so. That is not being smug, but a plain and simple fact.

I thought Spurs performance was pretty good. We defended very well with a makeshift defence. First half was quite dull and fought out in the midfield but I thought for the first 20 minutes or so of the second half we were the better team. Berbatov's well taken goal from an acute angle was pure class. Still, Keane blew it for us by missing the penalty. We lost, the best team won. Simply really. Still bloody hurts though.

Atila I was just trying to spread some Christmas love!


Chelsea 2 v 0 Aston Villa

Tottenham 2 v 1 Fulham

West Ham 2 v 2 Reading

Birmingham 1 v 1 Middlesbrough

Derby 2 v 3 Liverpool

Everton 2 v 2 Bolton

Sunderland 1 v 1 Man. United

Wigan 2 v 0 Newcastle

Portsmouth 1 v 3 Arsenal

Man. City 2 v 1 Blackburn

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...