Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fuschia - took your advice today and tried to stick to 3 hour feeds and seems to have worked well. No crying windy baby in the late afternoon, which we had for a couple of days before, and I no longer look like Jordan. What I meant by cluster feeding was that she would wake after a long nap, say 5 hours, ravenous and then prob have 3 feeds in an hour (2 and a half boobs, although I never know how to tell when a boob is empty - anyone got any advice for knowing when the tank is dry?).


We have no worries about bubs thriving (she's chubbing up nicely!) or jaundice, just rather needing to tweak the routine so I'm not overflowing with milk and bubs is able to digest the milk she is getting more easily. I think I was definitely overfeeding with 'poor' quality milk at too infrequent intervals.


Feeling optimistic (I do like a bit of a routine, I do) - thanks again for the advice all. Newborns really are the cutest, and so much easier to really enjoy the second time around.

That's good news ED. And yes that's cluster feeding.


Do you know what, re the empty boobs... that's when they get the good stuff! The milk that collects in your boobs loses fat back into the body amd ends up watery thirst quenching foremilk... once that's gone they get the hindmilk (which you produce as they feed) Some mums will offer both breasts, some find that's too much foremilk and just sticking to one side reduces windiness and increases weight gain.


Keep emptying your breasts as often as possible (8+ times a day, possibly 10-12) and you will both be benefitting.

Gosh I feel so broody reading this. I would love a tiny little snuggly one again. Unfort school fees rear their ugly pound sign heads and prevent it.


Fuschia, it was the militant and categorical way that the 3 hour wake up was expressed to us that I now realise was ridiculous. One cannot generalise to this extent. Boys will be different from girls and larger babies different again.


OTOH, 5 or 6 hours without any food would lead me to waken the baby.


As a digressison, you have twins I think. Did they have the same pattern?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Fair points, not arguing with you on them.  What people forget is that immigrants or low skilled workers do the jobs the home population don't want to do and without those jobs being done, things very quickly grind to a halt, i.e. hospital cleaners, all very necessary, but I'd have thought the majority are on minimum wage. And Minimum Wage (35hrs/wk) isn't exactly what I'd call minimum. Just over £21K, easily double and a bit more than what I get in monthly pension income to live off.
    • Well he couldn’t deliver anything better than a poor brexit. Because no such thing exists 
    • Fair points jazzer. But it begs the question, on what information are people basing their opinion? because if it’s x or the right wing media the of course they will believe nothing has happened but people who claim to be motivated by rising immigration numbers are either ignorant of or don’t care the those numbers have dropped significantly since Labour got in Hospital waiting lists are finally showing improvements after years of getting worse people on minimum wage are better off We haven’t had a random general election or new prime minister just months after the last one  compare that to Tory chaos Important relations with other countries (important for long term trade and growth) have improved under labour given the size of the mess they inherited it’s far better than many give credit for  and the prospect of a Badenoch and/or farage govt returning us to the chaos of last 10 years? No thanks (I could do a long list of things Labour have done wrong or badly but that’s for another thread. I did not vote for Labour, but all things considered they are a massive improvement on what came before. Unfortunately we have a bunch of far right agitators kicking off around the country because they are cry babies which gives impression country is going downhill  when it’s really not)  
    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...