Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't. My phone doesn't have a tv in it. Shit phone that it is.


Suddenly I feel inadequate.


I've gone to the pub to watch their TV though. Does that count?


I could never match SeanMac at funky though. Not many folks in this world can even if they have tellys in their phone. He'll almost always be watching something cooler.

And Lo. Half way through a lovely evening I am disturbed by a telephone call from my babsitter explaining that the smallest beaglet has been yelling so loudly and for such a long time that the neighbours are about to call social services again. So I had to go home.


Did I need photographic evidence of this fact? Musical accompaniment? GPS perhaps, to assist my dash along Lordship Lane? Did I yearn for an "app" (please note we are now all FAR too busy to say "application") that would point out the many and varied sights and places of interest that I passed on my way home?


I did not. The telephone I had was more than sufficient.


Thank you and good night.

Yeah well the last time I did that the kids started the kind of racket that makes ear doctors hand out leaflets, and then the neighbours got all whotever about it and the police turned up at my gaff again so now she won't babysit unless I am contactable "at all times" blah blah blah..............

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And Lo. Half way through a lovely evening I am

> disturbed by a telephone call from my babsitter

> explaining that the smallest beaglet has been

> yelling so loudly and for such a long time that

> the neighbours are about to call social services

> again. So I had to go home.

>

> Did I need photographic evidence of this fact?

> Musical accompaniment? GPS perhaps, to assist my

> dash along Lordship Lane? Did I yearn for an "app"

> (please note we are now all FAR too busy to say

> "application") that would point out the many and

> varied sights and places of interest that I passed

> on my way home?

>

> I did not. The telephone I had was more than

> sufficient.

>

> Thank you and good night.



No but you could have taken a picture of your arse, appended the message "Kiss it!" and asked said babysitter to show it to social services!


Not exactly productive, FUNNY but not productive!

I am an owner of one. Contrary to certain prejudice related consumer -ware on the market, this device has been an absolute godsend. I've set up all my e-mails and can access them when it's urgent. I don't have to hassle with internet cafes or use a really old, back dated PC to go online when I'm out of the country.


Great for taking quick pictures of anything that interests me. I agree with Steve, carrying a camera is annoyingly heavier but it certainly serves it's purpose better than an i-phone - to take quality photographs.


This also is a substitute for an i-pod as this is readily available on the software.


AND no I didn't desire to own one for flaunting purposes, more as a practical solution to my work circumstances.

Worth pointing out though that you don?t need an iphone to do those things. There are other phones with cameras, audio players and internet incorporated.


Just like it is worth pointing out that there were pleanty of MP3 players with the same capabilities on the market before apple launched ipods along with the itunes monopoly.

Thing about Apple is that they may make things that other people have already done, but they make them mighty purty, and usually with pretty intuitive functionality. Like Nokia used to be on phones before they got a bit rubbish.


I would have bought an iphone if it weren't for the email issue. When recently buying a new laptop, I did go for a macbook - shiny shiny lovely lovely. Sometimes I stroke it.




Edited because I cannot spell it seems.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • On appealing, I've had the same reply regarding my personal membership, despite being told previously by staff that I could apply for a (partial) refund when the pool finally reopens (it still isn't open) and to go ahead and use the gym instead in the meantime. I've made a formal complaint. Any local journalists on here? Perhaps local councillors are following this thread?
    • You got my point exactly. Sending money out of the country is disinvestment. Successive government's  here make a big noise about incoming investment by foreign businesses. but keep quiet about the outflow of £28.5 Bn annually by remittances. I can't recall any recent inflows matching that amount. No wonder the country is getting poorer by the day.
    • If that £28 billion was spent on, I don't know, Guinness in the EDT, it would raise cash through VAT and alcohol duty. If it was invested, say in Diageo (the parent company of Guinness), those dividends would be subject to CGT. I have no wish to pay more tax, but it seems like a significant loophole, and one that wouldn't affect me, so I'm in favour of it.  
    • I have now had a reply from the leisure centre about why I am not entitled to a refund for my children's swimming lessons: To qualify for a refund, members must meet all of the following criteria: Have only ever used the swimming pool at Dulwich Leisure Centre, and not any other facilities such as the gym or fitness classes. Have not used any other Southwark Leisure Centres while the Dulwich pool has been closed. Have joined after the pool closure.   This makes sense for a refund on a gym membership but makes absolutely no sense for a refund on swimming lessons for my children that they cancelled. Has anyone else had this?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...