Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Aplogies if this has been discussed recently on the forum, I could not find a thread... I am totally confused about pre school.


I thought it started with mornings or afternoons when the child was about 3, and that you registered just the summer before they would go. Seems I have this totally wrong?


People have told me that they go from 2 in this area? Are the local 'pre schools' just the same as private nurseries...ie with very long waiting lists (so need to register long before) and horrendously expensive fees? What I am trying to say is, is 'pre school' just another word for/ the same as 'nursery', therefore optional (and expensive!!).


My little boy is 16months and I'm worried now because I thought I didn't have to think about school things for a while. I would like to have him at his nursery a day or two a week when my second is born but I was just expecting to have to pay for the local private nursery that he goes to now?


Any advice much appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12503-pre-school-confusion/
Share on other sites

The government pays for 15 p/w free nursery education for every child from the term after their third birthday. This is usually in the form of 5 x 3h sessions (am or pm) if in the nusery class of a school... private nurseries may offer more flexibility, I believe the 15h must be spread across a minimum of 3 days though. Nurseries who wish to gain the govt funding are supposed to offer this 15h totally free (no top up fees) though it looks many flout the law (and the tories seem minded to allow top up fees)


Nurseries that offer the 15h locally include Buds, Puddleduck... and many schools have nursery classes. You should probably apply about a year in advance. I think for Sept 2011 school nusery admissions, places may be allocated from Spring 2011, for eg. Some nurseries may charge a fee to go on the waiting list.

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Parents/Preschooldevelopmentandlearning/NurseriesPlaygroupsReceptionClasses/DG_10016103


Getting a place in a school nursery has no bearing at all on reception admissions. You can be in nursery but not get a reception place, and you can get in to reception without having been in nursery.

DoD - it's v complicated. Some private pre-schools will claim the govt money, in which case you'll pay reduced fees. But some don't, not least because it's not clear what sort of top-up fees the nursery can then charge if they are providing a full-time service. My son's nursery just knocks the govt money off the total fees (i.e. if total fees are ?1000 /month and the govt money is ?300 /month, then they charge the remaining ?700)


BUT other nurseries (local authorities?) think they should do it based on hours, so if the fees are currently ?1000 for 40 hours /week, and the government pay ?300 for 15 hours/week then the nursery can only charge a top up for the remaining 25 hours of ?1000 * 25 / 40 = ?625, i.e. the nursery make a ?75 loss, which they can't afford so they don't take the govt money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...