Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Page 15. He's a local boy, I've definitely seem him around town.

Props to him for his campaign to get himself on telly as much as possible. There should be all sorts on screen, not just young attractive people. Bit sad that he describes himself as 'quite unsightly' though, I'd say he's just normal looking.

(And I don't think there's anything wrong with discussing him on the forum given the nature of his campaign, and the coverage).

I thought madger?s original post was exactly the right way to go about drumming up support and was so well-expressed I nearly signed up, until I remembered I don?t agree (with all of it anyway)


I agree that Goose Green to Budgens is pretty grim on a Friday and Saturday nights ? but if it?s possible to have long drinking hours in other countries, my interest would be in unravelling why it seems to cause such problems here

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a special page for girls, Rosie. It's

> called 'Femail'. Do you see what they did there?

> Femail. Makes me chuckle.


Oooooooh I do. I do see what they did there. Aren't they clever? They're ever so clever those boys they are. Well done them. I'd have gone and called it something crass like: "Give this part to the little lady so you can read about crime and norks in peace" but see they were MUCH cleverer than that. I'd go so far as to say that's the pinnacle of British journalism, and no mistake.

paragon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> he was being interviewed by a Camera crew outside

> Emily's Fish Bar about 20 mins ago.



-------------------------------------------


Puleeze....



Don't tell me he's taken up the plight of "The Vanishing Cod"


( that will be the death knell for them )



I can see the "banner" now....


"A Cod isn't for supper, it's for Life"


&


"Fish don't have Fingers , but they do have Feelings "




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...