Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why oh why do I ever think I can just leave my toddler for a second and finish doing something, or take a second for myself, when I know that the repercussions more than negate any satisfaction or benefit from said activity? This morning's regret was finishing an email when I knew there was a stone on the door mat, which, it appears, 16 month old O has swallowed. Can't find it anywhere and O appeared looking surprised and a bit sheepish, and drooling. Doesn't appear to have had any ill effects and didn't interfere with breathing, but was a fairly largish irregularly shaped pebble, although thankfully quite flat and not sharp. I know, I know, deeply irresponsible of me to leave him unmonitored with said stone, but he normally just drops them in the dog bowl. Googled advice seems to be to watch out for it in nappies over next week (nice), and if doesn't appear then to go to Dr for x-ray, but can't stop the parental anxiety and would be v grateful for any other advice or tales of similar experiences.

DS1 swallowed a coin, they xrayed him to check it was in stomach not lungs and said it would turn up by itself (we never spotted it though)


I'd watch out for any signs it is affecting breathing or blocking intestines, otherwise probably don't worry too much!!! How big was it?

Hmmm, hard to say, maybe 50p piece but a bit more oval shaped, and flattish. Can't believe something that big wouldn't have caused more distress or disturbance though, but can't find the wretched thing on floor so stomach seems the likely location. Don't think in lungs but yes, shall monitor nappy filling and hope for the best! Thank you for the reply, always reassuring.

Fi from West Dulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, hard to say, maybe 50p piece but a bit more

> oval shaped, and flattish. Can't believe something

> that big wouldn't have caused more distress or

> disturbance though, but can't find the wretched

> thing on floor so stomach seems the likely

> location. Don't think in lungs but yes, shall

> monitor nappy filling and hope for the best! Thank

> you for the reply, always reassuring.



Hmm.. if that's big maybe you should get him checked out!

Thanks for this and all replies, since spoken to A and E and NHS Direct and advice is, as clearly not obstructing breathing or causing ill effects, to watch nappies for next 2 weeks, and if no appearance, to go to GP. Just hoping he has the constitution of an ox.

don't know if the stone would be visible on XR and second the advice you've been given to watch nappies - also if he was to start vomiting lots or lost appetite as this could be early indication of bowel obstruction.


Noteworthy to all is please NOT to ring A&E asking for advice - the nurses aren't legally covered to give phone advice(unlike with NHS direct), won't be able to fully reassure as for an A&E nurse the most important part is seeing the child face-to-face (even after nearly 9yrs A&E experience I'll still suggest coming in than being able to wholeheartedly say all is ok without seeing them).


Can also lead to delays in treatment of children/families already in the dept (is infuriating as these calls often come when we're rushed off our feet and when we try and explain this to the caller's they take umbridge!).


Either call NHS direct, SELDOC or if so concerned just come in to the dept.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...