Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even more annoying is the comment from DVO that she couldn't continue to BF past 3 weeks because of photographers who might take photos of her in Starbucks while she was feeding. So the latte is more important then Denise??


I don't have any objection to bottle feeding if that's a choice/necessity for the mum, but this reason is just pathetic... These 'celebs' need to get a life.

I agree - Denise's comments are just plain wrong for the reason ladywotlunches says - and Giselle's are out of touch with reality. However I am giving her the benefit of the doubt that her comments could have been twisted as of course, I believe, women should TRY and breast feed for 6 months given it is undisputedly the best start in life for your baby and that has to come first - but I absolutely sympathise with women who can't as it must be so upsetting. Women who 'won't' however due to vanity I can not relate to.

V.annoyed with the Giselle quotes in Metro, especially those relating to labour (e.g. "it is called labour not a holiday", "I did lots of yoga to prepare", "I wasn't expecting anyone else to get the baby out for me"). Am probably feeling over-sensitive as am heavily pregnant and not a supermodel!


Purely gossip, and on another topic, but with respect to SJP's surrogate twins, d'you think she used her own eggs, or the surrogate's / a donor's? I read (in "quality" publications such as Heat magazine) that often older celebs who have babies use donor eggs.

since when did anyone give a monkeys about what an unknown model thinks?


she's a nobody and her opinions really only have relevance to herself and her direct family


even for 'silly season' this is dull dull dull


cant we have another contradictory study to cry/debate over?


http://www.madeformums.com/mums-and-dads/children-of-working-mums-dont-suffer/9688.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If it was limited to a couple of days a year, so we all knew, that would be fine. In the last few years (and it is a recent thing) you get random fireworks going off any time after dusk for half the year. It does more than cause problems for pets and wildlife- it can mean lasting damage and massive expense and hassle for pet owners. All because some get a buzz out of loud bangs.
    • Ohh dear.  Fireworks can be great fun.  Where I used to live the kids would have firework wars/games.  Watching them was more enjoyable than watching  TV. (Which you could hardly hear due to the pops and bangs).  It's not like anyone/anything could stop them. I would still prefer organised public displays that are affordable.   And I agree that fireworks cause problems for wild life, pets and people.   It seems to be one of those things that just happens so we have to put up with it.  But it is still not as problematic here as in other areas in London - that's for sure.
    • I made sure to set off a few today just to rile you guys up 😇😂 Always looking for something to criticise 
    • Ugly...maybe..does it bother me..NO! I think its somehow reassuring to see theres still phoneboxes around. East Dulwich may  be getrified but there may well be some elderly people who don't have mobiles and kids who may have lost theirs adults ditto etc etc. I'd rather keep it than lose it...just because i don't use it does'nt mean its not needed.  there are many eyesores in the modern world not all of them as potentially useful.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...