Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think perhaps the best modern day example of

> marmite comedy is Mrs Brown's Boys.

>

> My parents think it is hilarious. Some people I

> know who are my age think it's hilarious. It's

> ratings show that many many people watch it, so

> presumably think it's hilarious.

>

>

> I am missing the joke.


I am also missing that particular joke.


Didn't it recently win some kind of funniest show award?

I went to see Jerry Sadowitz sometime in the eighties, in a quite small Arts Centre.


He had some sidekick with him who at one point during the evening proceeded to expose himself to the audience.


I'm still not sure whether I should have found that funny or not, tbh. I'm not sure whether I would now, either.


But I can't remember the context. Or whether I laughed at the time.

You're right. In todays political correctness gone mad world I shouldn't be insulting to people based on their size, creed, colour, sexual orientation, number of children they have, job shy or not, if they are vegetarian or indeed vegan, in fact anything and especially if they are funny or not. I hang my head in shame about calling Gervais a fat fcuk.


Following on from this though, everyone who has posted on this thread is comedeyist. Shame on all of you.




malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Salsaboy - why do you seem to have to revert to

> the language of the street? Gervais is in deed

> over rated and not funny. Do insult him for that

> but not his size.

>

> You should organise a one to one with

> aforementioned Nick Helm (a fat and bearded fcuk

> to use your terminology) where you can fcuk and

> cant at each other to your hearts content.

> Preferably in a sealed room without any connection

> to the outside world where nobody can hear you or

> read about it. The last one alive wins.

>

> Now that is what I call funny.

Wow


In my youth we freely used mong (downs) and spas (spastic) as insults. Thanks God we've moved on. If that is too politically correct for you then it is a sad day.


Now I don't car about chalkboard vs blackboard, and brainstorm vs brainshower.


It just seems to be a shallow insult/argument quoting PC. Whilst funny tubby comics such as Jo Brand used their size to good comic effect, and perhaps as she lives just down the road she would sit on you. In a crushing rather than other sense.


Go and think about your words and write a 500 word essay.

Jim Davidson - a white comedian who made jokes about black culture to a predominantly white audience.

Lenny Henry - a black comedian who made jokes about black culture to a predominantly white audience.


Both had 1980's output that made me feel uncomfortable tbh.

Many many years ago there was a TV comedy show called "Not the 9'O'clock News" . Very funny, "Fast Show" type of thing. A great show, I thought. Then they did a sketch about Argentinian torture and not only I didn't find it funny, but I never found anything they ever did funny again. Not a moral or ethical decision, just some sort of internal switch went off. An odd experience.

So, comedy isn't just about being funny.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think perhaps the best modern day example of

> marmite comedy is Mrs Brown's Boys.

>

> My parents think it is hilarious. Some people I

> know who are my age think it's hilarious. It's

> ratings show that many many people watch it, so

> presumably think it's hilarious.

>

>

> I am missing the joke.


God yes. What the hell is that about. See also, 'two pints of larger and a packet of crisps', which was one of the most popular TV comedies of the last decade and completely unfunny (imo).

DovertheRoad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jim Davidson - a white comedian who made jokes about black culture to a predominantly white audience.

> Lenny Henry - a black comedian who made jokes about black culture to a predominantly white audience.

>

> Both had 1980's output that made me feel uncomfortable tbh.


You wouldn't be the first person to criticise LH for playing up to a white audience, but at least he was able to base his comedy on informed observations. Unlike Davidson, who I suspect knew nothing about the Jamaican people, but just liked taking the piss out of them. It's an unfair comparison.

my un-comedy fave was when I was in Brixton and the comedian got annoyed with me and my other for not paying him attention and kissing obviously annoyed him so much he forgot that his (rather extreme) insults and verbal abuse could be heard at the back of the room even without his mic on...(sound carries in old cellars)..


He got booed off and then tried to start a fight.


Not funny.. and just a bit thankful there were a hundred witnesses.

Richard Herring in a pub up at Crystal Palace - Lord Norwood is a bit on the large size and RH thought he'd have a pop at him about it..... I replied something along the lines of "is that the best you can come up with, lame" and we walked out, think we got more laughs than RH who was a lost for words....

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My main issue with Lenny Henry was that he wasn't

> funny. Davidson is a nasty piece of work imo.



See I thought LH was funny at one point. Admittedly it was a very long time ago, and it probably got forgotten after being buried under lots of not very funny. But I still smile when I see clips from Live & Unleashed (1989).





But I was 11 at the time.


Agree with Jeremy that it's not fair to compare that to Jim Davidson though.


RE 2 pints of lager, I remember watching it a bit when it very first came out, and finding some of it mildly amusing in a very badly acted Hollyoaks being naughty kind of way.


But that was very short lived, and I was amazed to find it still going YEARS later.

I?ve given up getting particularly hot under the collar about this on the whole. If someone wants to go and watch something generally harmless, get into a jovial mood, laugh at stuff and then come home to their insipid, pointless lives then big deal, so what. My Mum too loves the dreaded Mrs Brown. It doesn?t make her a moron, she just likes it. The only definition of something being 'funny' is that it makes people 'laugh' and different people laugh at different things so there it is.


That said, it?s the dirge of TV comedy panels that gets me riled, because they?re on EVERYWHERE ALL THE TIME - and seem to only be frequented by the same rotating cabal of mediocrity who are simply fortunate enough to have been touched with the magic Avalon Management stick. Watching them is like being trapped in Jongleurs on a bad night - an experience I have had more than once but never want to repeat.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DovertheRoad Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jim Davidson - a white comedian who made jokes

> about black culture to a predominantly white

> audience.

> > Lenny Henry - a black comedian who made jokes

> about black culture to a predominantly white

> audience.

> >

> > Both had 1980's output that made me feel

> uncomfortable tbh.

>

> You wouldn't be the first person to criticise LH

> for playing up to a white audience, but at least

> he was able to base his comedy on informed

> observations. Unlike Davidson, who I suspect knew

> nothing about the Jamaican people, but just liked

> taking the piss out of them. It's an unfair

> comparison.


Not a fair direct comparison. But whilst you could say LH got a pass on the basis of colour...he def didn't endear himself to a certain portion of the black community. And I respect their right to feel like that. Perhaps most telling is that he has long since dropped that material.

Don't pick on our Lenny. If you want to pick on someone make it David Jason who was miles off a Peckham accent - which in any case was filmed in Bristol. Or the classic John Nettles where they decided that he should have a SW accent even though they sound nothing like that in Jersey (Begerac). Or Dick Van Dyke. Or some of the mish mash in East Enders where they can't even get the ethnicity right (oh you have brown skin, you can be a generic South Asian).
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...