Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, can anyone help me to understand why the old faded yellow box junction

at the bottom of Friern road opposite the park has been re painted. There is

no exit or entry with bollards blocking this end of Friern road so there is no longer a

junction. Would there be a fine if entered? With the

traffic lights being near there the traffic can build up in rush hour.

I have stopped in it in the past thinking it no longer existed and not received a fine

but now it is bright yellow again I'm not so sure. Has anyone else noticed?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/128288-yellow-box-junction/
Share on other sites

Here's some red meat for you: I'm back from a month traveling coast to coast north to south in the USA and politics aside and the probable reason of police enforcement of traffic violations.... all this ASIDE in most places US drivers stop on a dime for pedestrians and intersections are left clear of cars. TBH I'd like to see a lot more use of boxed intersections here and a lot more courtesy to pedestrians. Enjoy

mynamehere Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL Insane country. Very very bad stuff can happen

> to good people. But over all when a person even

> comes close to the street and looks like they

> might cross cars stop. Given: people cross at

> corners not randomly as they do here.


My US born grandmother once got a ticket from a police officer for jaywalking.

  • 5 months later...

Interesting. The law on box junctions say you can only have box junction as follows:


"box junction" means the area of carriageway marked with yellow cross-hatching at a junction between two or more roads on which there has been placed the road marking


I would suggest that anyone who gets a ticket in this could argue that whilst the bollards are in place, it is not actually a junction and therefore the yellow box is invalid. Could be an interesting defence.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting. The law on box junctions say you can

> only have box junction as follows:

>

> "box junction" means the area of carriageway

> marked with yellow cross-hatching at a junction

> between two or more roads on which there has been

> placed the road marking

>

> I would suggest that anyone who gets a ticket in

> this could argue that whilst the bollards are in

> place, it is not actually a junction and therefore

> the yellow box is invalid. Could be an

> interesting defence.


Good luck with that.


It might be easier just to not go in the box..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...