Jump to content

Recommended Posts

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's worth pointing out that the pictures

> attached I don't think are the actual pictures of

> these dogs. They are pictures that the OP has

> trawled the internet for to use to demonstrate

> what she saw.


I think its worth pointing out that the OP explained in an earlier posting that the pictures attached weren't the actual pictures of the dogs in question, rather that they were used for comparison purposes.

Yes, you're right really huggers. In fact, I've been wrong on this and unduly harsh. Of course this kind and considerate lady has every right to show concern for these dogs. There is another thread at the moment about being human. The OP has demonstrated this with her compassion. I'm sorry if I caused any offence to animal lovers.
  • 2 weeks later...
Have spoken to the lady owner of these two dogs while out walking in peckham rye park.Was shocked at out skinny these dogs were so could,nt help myself but to ask. The very nice ,friendly lady told me that they are very elderly, 14 years old,brother and sister and they are italian greyhounds she said that they eat like horses but dont gain weight.They are very happy little dogs, one is blind but they seem to enjoy their walks.It's quite funny to watch the pair of them.The lady seemed very genuine to me with nothing to hide.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...